Anesthesia Endoscope Mask is Applied to Sedation Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Diagnosis and Treatment

November 16, 2023 updated by: Mengchang Yang, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital

Anesthesia Endoscope Mask is Applied to Sedation Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Diagnosis and Treatment: Multi-center, Prospective, Randomized Control, Open Clinical Research

To investigate the efficacy and safety of new-type mask compared with nasal tube oxygen delivery in patients undergoing sedation of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study aims to utilize a large sample, multicenter, prospective clinical trial using a new mask oxygen supply technology. If the study confirms that the new mask can improve the airway safety and effectiveness in patient examinations, while improving examination efficiency and reducing failure rates, it will provide safety assurance for the early diagnosis and treatment of upper gastrointestinal diseases in high-risk populations.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1208

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Sichuan, China
        • Recruiting
        • Chengdu Second People's Hospital
        • Contact:
    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China
        • Recruiting
        • Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Mengchang Yang, Doctor
          • Phone Number: +8618140049936
          • Email: ymc681@126.com
      • Liangshan, Sichuan, China
        • Recruiting
        • First People's Hospital of Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture
        • Contact:
      • Yibin, Sichuan, China
        • Recruiting
        • Second People's Hospital of Yibin
        • Contact:
      • Ziyang, Sichuan, China
        • Recruiting
        • Ziyang People's Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years;
  2. Upcoming upper gastrointestinal sedation procedure;
  3. Classification under the American Association of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status I-III;
  4. Baseline oxygen saturation (SpO2) ≥95% in ambient air conditions.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Individuals with previously documented difficulties in mask ventilation (DMV);
  2. Patients predisposed to aspiration risks or episodes of vomiting;
  3. Facial or jaw injuries or congenital abnormalities that render conventional face mask application infeasible;
  4. An inability or unwillingness to utilize the novel disposable anesthesia face mask.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Nasal oxygen supply group
The study team applied the mask with a head strap to ensure a proper seal,simultaneously ensuring the same oxygen flow rate as the control group
The anaesthesia provider supplied oxygen via a nasal cannula at an oxygen flow rate of 8 Litres/minute supplied from an oxygen flowmeter as described in the guide
Experimental: Mask oxygen supply group
The anaesthesia provider supplied oxygen via a nasal cannula at an oxygen flow rate of 8 Litres/minute supplied from an oxygen flowmeter
The study team applied the mask with a head strap to ensure a proper seal,simultaneously ensuring the same oxygen flow rate as the control group

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of hypoxemia
Time Frame: From the start of drug administration by the researcher to the completely withdraw from the endoscopy by the end of the examination.
Incidences of oxygen saturation falling below 92%
From the start of drug administration by the researcher to the completely withdraw from the endoscopy by the end of the examination.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of compromised ventilation mandating primary manual intervention
Time Frame: From the start of drug administration by the researcher to the completely withdraw from the endoscopy by the end of the examination.
For the nasal catheter cohort, this entailed jaw elevation and deploying a standard mask to augment the oxygen concentration inhaled. Concurrently, for the mask cohort, primary intervention involved mandible lifting and secure fastening of the mask sleeve for inflation (while ensuring the operational aperture remains sealed).
From the start of drug administration by the researcher to the completely withdraw from the endoscopy by the end of the examination.
Incidence necessitating sophisticated manual ventilatory support during pain-free gastroscopy
Time Frame: From the start of drug administration by the researcher to the completely withdraw from the endoscopy by the end of the examination.
If SpO2 levels further descended to ≤70% or persistently hovered below 85% for a duration exceeding 60 seconds, it mandated an immediate cessation of the ongoing procedure. The endoscope would be retracted, followed by the insertion of a standard oropharyngeal mask for assisted ventilation. In dire circumstances, the anesthesiologist might opt for advanced airway interventions, such as laryngeal mask application or endotracheal intubation.
From the start of drug administration by the researcher to the completely withdraw from the endoscopy by the end of the examination.
Juxtaposition of hypoxemia onset time in both ventilation techniques
Time Frame: From the start of drug administration by the researcher to the completely withdraw from the endoscopy by the end of the examination.
The time span from the start of drug administration by the researcher to the first occurrence of blood oxygen saturation below 92%.
From the start of drug administration by the researcher to the completely withdraw from the endoscopy by the end of the examination.
the temporal span from initial decline to recovery to 92% saturation in both ventilation techniques
Time Frame: From the start of drug administration by the researcher to the completely withdraw from the endoscopy by the end of the examination.
The time span from oxygen saturation below 92% to recovery to 92% after manual ventilatory support. If multiple episodes of hypoxia occur, all times will be added up
From the start of drug administration by the researcher to the completely withdraw from the endoscopy by the end of the examination.
the lowest oxygen saturation in both ventilation techniques
Time Frame: From the start of drug administration by the researcher to the completely withdraw from the endoscopy by the end of the examination.
the lowest oxygen saturation from the start of medication administration to the participants's Aldrete score of 9.
From the start of drug administration by the researcher to the completely withdraw from the endoscopy by the end of the examination.
Evaluation of procedural prolongation due to ventilation issues
Time Frame: From the start of drug administration by the researcher to the completely withdraw from the endoscopy by the end of the examination.
The extension time for examination is defined as the total time from stopping the operation and exiting the endoscope until the endoscope re-enters the digestive tract, to the same anatomical position before stopping the operation, If multiple episodes of withdrawal of endoscopy occur, all times will be added up
From the start of drug administration by the researcher to the completely withdraw from the endoscopy by the end of the examination.
Satisfaction scores1 from patients, endoscopists, and anesthesiologists
Time Frame: Immediately after the procedure.
The scores of satisfaction 1:Are you satisfied with this endoscopic diagnosis and treatment,a score of 0 represents very dissatisfied, while a score of 10 represents very satisfied.
Immediately after the procedure.
Satisfaction scores2 from patients, endoscopists, and anesthesiologists
Time Frame: Immediately after the procedure.
The scores of satisfaction2:If there is a chance, are you willing to use this non-invasive oxygen device again,a score of 0 indicates a strong unwillingness, while a score of 10 indicates a strong willingness.
Immediately after the procedure.
The incidence of upper respiratory tract discomfort manifestations such as oral, nasal, an pharyngeal dryness and hemorrhage in two groups of participants.
Time Frame: Immediately after the procedure.
Immediately after the procedure.
Inaugural insertion success rates in two groups of participants
Time Frame: From the start of drug administration by the researcher to the completely withdraw from the endoscopy by the end of the examination.
If the endoscopic operation fails to pass the pharynx after three attempts, recorded as the first insertion failure.
From the start of drug administration by the researcher to the completely withdraw from the endoscopy by the end of the examination.
Apnea prevalence in both groups
Time Frame: From the start of drug administration by the researcher to the completely withdraw from the endoscopy by the end of the examination.
The study here we define apnea as 10 second without obvious respiratory movements of mesothorax and abdomen or snoring with paradoxical breathing
From the start of drug administration by the researcher to the completely withdraw from the endoscopy by the end of the examination.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 18, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 8, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 17, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 20, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • endoscope mask-1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

After December 2024, the original data can be obtained through the author's email address.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After December 2024

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Any project applicant

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypoxemia

Clinical Trials on Mask group

Subscribe