PENG Block vs. ESP Block for Pediatric Hip Surgery

February 26, 2024 updated by: Poznan University of Medical Sciences

PENG Block vs. ESP Block for Pediatric Hip Surgery. A Randomized, Prospective Double-blinded Clinical Trial.

The study compares the effectiveness and safety of the pericapsular nerve blockade vs. ESPB in pediatric patients who underwent hip surgeries.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study compares the effectiveness and safety of the pericapsular nerve blockade vs. ESPB in pediatric patients who underwent hip surgeries. In addition, we aim to determine the optimal volume of local anesthetics needed to achieve a satisfactory level of analgesia.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Wielkopolska
      • Poznań, Wielkopolska, Poland, 61-545
        • Department of Spine Diseases and Pediatric Orthopedics, University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- pediatric patients aged between 0-12 years who will undergo hip surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • a history of chronic pain use of gabapentin/pregabalin for > 3 months opioid use > 1 repeated opioid prescription in the last three months
  • morbid obesity (BMI > 99th percentile)
  • Infection at block application area
  • coagulopathy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control group
regional anesthesia: spinal anesthesia - 0,1ml/kg 0,5% ropivacaine
No erector spinae block and no pericapsular nerve group block
Other Names:
  • No erector spinae block and no pericapsular nerve group block
Active Comparator: Pericapsular nerve group block (PENG) group
regional anesthesia: spinal anesthesia - 0,1ml/kg 0,5% ropivacaine + PENG block - 0.5mL/kg 0.2% ropivacaine, max. 20mL
Unilateral ultrasound guided pericapsular nerve block using 0.5mL/kg 0.2% Ropimol (max 20mL)
Active Comparator: Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) group
regional anesthesia: spinal anesthesia - 0,1ml/kg 0,5% ropivacaine + ESP block - 0.5mL/kg 0.2% ropivacaine, max. 20mL
Unilateral ultrasound guided erector spinae block using 0.5mL/kg 0.2% Ropimol (max 20mL)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
FLACC score
Time Frame: 48 hours after surgery
The FLACC scale or Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Controllability Scale is used to assess pain for children between the ages of 2 months and seven years or individuals unable to communicate their pain. The scale is scored in a range of 0-10, with 0 representing no pain.
48 hours after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
NLR
Time Frame: 48 hours after surgery
neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio
48 hours after surgery
PLR
Time Frame: 48 hours after surgery
platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio
48 hours after surgery
total opioid consumption
Time Frame: 48 hours after surgery
morphine equivalents in miligrams
48 hours after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Tomasz Kotwicki, Prof.dr hab, Poznan University of Medical Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 17, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 23, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

February 23, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 5, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 17, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 28, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 26, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hip Fractures

Clinical Trials on Standard care

Subscribe