Trial to Evaluate Efficacy+Safety of Revita DMR Treatment Paradigm 1 and Retreatment in Type 2 Diabetes Patients (REMIND)

January 15, 2026 updated by: Jacques J.G.H.M. Bergman, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

A Randomized Double-blind Sham-controlled Trial to Evaluate Efficacy+Safety of Revita Duodenal Mucosal Resurfacing (DMR) Treatment Paradigm+Retreatment in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Using Non-insulin Glucose Lowering Medications (REMIND)

The objective of this study is to evaluate feasibility, safety, and efficacy of endoscopic DMR Treatment Paradigm 1 (compared to sham) and to evaluate feasibility, safety, and efficacy of re-treatment with DMR at 24 weeks (compared to baseline and a single DMR procedure) in patients with type 2 diabetes with non-insulin glucose lowering medications.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

The objective of this study is to evaluate feasibility, safety, and efficacy of endoscopic DMR Treatment Paradigm 1 (compared to sham) and to evaluate feasibility, safety, and efficacy of re-treatment with DMR at 24 weeks (compared to baseline and a single DMR procedure) in patients with type 2 diabetes with non-insulin glucose lowering medications.

The aimed effect is an adequate or improved glucose regulation and a decrease of HbA1c. Secondary effects include improved cardiovascular, hepatic, and metabolic parameters.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

18

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosed with Type 2 Diabetes.
  2. Age ≥ 18 to ≤ 75 years.
  3. Insulin naïve patients who are on stable dose (maximally approved or tolerated dose) of 2 or more glucose lowering drugs, including metformin, sulphonylurea (SU), (sodium-glucose cotransporter-2) inhibitors (SGLT-2i), Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) or dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP-4i) and/or, thiazolidinedionderivaten (TZD) for at least 12 weeks.
  4. BMI ≥ 24 and ≤ 40 kg/m2
  5. HbA1c of ≥ 54 mmol/mol (7.5%) and ≤ 86 mmol/mol (10.0%).
  6. Signed and dated written informed consent in accordance with Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and local legislation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Uncontrolled hyperglycemia with a glucose level >270 mg/dl (>15.0 mmol/L) after an overnight 8-hour fasting at the end of run-in and confirmed by a second measurement on the consecutive day.
  2. Subjects who are using insuline.
  3. Known case of absolute insulin deficiency as indicated by a fasting plasma C-peptide value of <0.6 ng/ml (<0,2 nmol/L).
  4. Diagnosis of autoimmune diabetes/Type 1 diabetes mellitus, monogenic (neonatal or maturity onset diabetes of the young (MODY)) diabetes or Type 1 diabetes in adults/latent autoimmune diabetes of adults (LADA).
  5. History of more than 1 severe hypoglycemia episode or unawareness within past 6 months in which third party assistance was needed.
  6. Clinically significant valvular heart disease or severe aortic stenosis.
  7. Acute coronary syndrome (non-ST wave elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI), STEMI and unstable angina pectoris), stroke or transient ischemic attack within the past 3 months.
  8. Indication of acute liver disease, defined by serum levels of either ALT (SGPT), AST (SGOT), or alkaline phosphatase above 3 x upper limit of normal (ULN).
  9. Presence of acute or chronic active hepatitis B or C (except if hepatitis C is cured) or cirrhosis; or hepatic decompensation during the last 6 months; or alcoholic or autoimmune chronic hepatitis.
  10. Impaired renal function, defined as estimated Glomerular Filtration rate (eGFR) < 45 ml/min/1.73m2 or end stage renal failure or on dialysis.
  11. Diagnosed with esophageal motility disorder or Glomerular Filtration rate (GERD) gr 3 or diagnosed during screening endoscopy.
  12. Known history of a structural or functional disorder of the stomach, e.g. active gastric ulcer, chronic gastritis, gastric varices, hiatal hernia, stomach cancer or any other disorder of the stomach.
  13. Previous GI surgery that could affect the ability to treat the duodenum such as patients who have had a Billroth 2, Roux-and-Y gastric bypass, gastric sleeve or other similar procedures.
  14. Known intestinal autoimmune disease, including Celiac disease, or pre-existing symptoms of lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, or other autoimmune connective tissue disorder, which affects the small intestine.
  15. Patients with active helicobacter pylori infection. Patients may be enrolled if they had history of h-pylori infection and were successfully treated.
  16. History of active malignancy or partial remission from clinically significant malignancy within the past 5 years. With the exception of basal or squamous cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ or those received curative treatment and in complete remission for 5 years or if subject confirmed as cancer free.
  17. Blood dyscrasias or any disorders causing hemolysis or unstable Red Blood Cells (sickle cell trait is allowed).
  18. Known case of severe peripheral vascular disease.
  19. Clinically active systemic infection.
  20. Known immunocompromised status, including individuals who have undergone organ transplantation, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy within the past 12 months, clinically significant leukopenia or positive for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), on potential immunosuppressants.
  21. Current treatment with systemic steroids or change in dosage of thyroid hormones within 6 weeks prior to consent or any other uncontrolled endocrine disorder.
  22. Use of anticoagulation therapy (such as warfarin, coumadin, Novel Oral AntiCoagulants (NOAC) or anti-platelet agents (such as thienopyridine) which cannot be discontinued for 5-7 days or 2 drug half-lives before the procedure; Acetylsalicylic acid does not need to be discontinued.
  23. Actively participating in weight loss program or using medications for weight loss 3 months prior to randomization.
  24. General contraindications to deep or conscious sedation or general anesthesia or high risk (e.g., American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification (ASA) 4 or higher) or contraindications to upper GI Endoscopy.
  25. Nursing or Pregnant women or women of child bearing potential who are unwilling to practice acceptable method of birth control.
  26. History of alcohol, legal or illegal drug and substance abuse.
  27. Intake of an investigational drug in another trial within 30 days prior to consent or active participation in another clinical trial of an investigational drug or device.
  28. Any other clinical or mental condition which would jeopardize subject's safety or makes subject a poor candidate for clinical trial participation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: DMR procedure
Patients receive Revita® DMR Treatment Paradigm 1. After unblinding at 24 weeks, they receive retreatment.

The Revita® System is an endoscopic treatment consisting of a single catheter and console designed to lift the duodenal mucosa with saline followed by controlled circumferential hydrothermal ablation of the mucosa. For this study Revita® DMR procedure will be conducted as follows:

DMR Treatment Paradigm 1- After initial 2 Lift and Ablate step, remaining Lift: Ablate steps will be conducted in 1:1 manner.

Other Names:
  • Revita® DMR Treatment Paradigm 1
  • Revita Duodenal Mucosal Resurfacing
Sham Comparator: Sham procedure
Patients receive a sham procedure. After unblinding takes place at 24 weeks, patients receive a Revita® DMR Treatment Paradigm 1. 48 weeks after initial sham (= 24 weeks after first DMR) patients may receive retreatment, if they want to.
The sham control for the Revita DMR procedure.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety endpoint
Time Frame: 12 weeks post DMR and 12 weeks post retreatment with DMR

Safety endpoint is evaluated 12 weeks post DMR and 12 weeks post retreatment with DMR

- Number (percentage) of patients experienced device and procedure-related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Unanticipated Device Effects (UADEs), Serious Adverse Device Effects (SADEs), Suspected Unexpected Serious Adverse Reaction (SUSARs)

12 weeks post DMR and 12 weeks post retreatment with DMR
Feasibility endpoint 1
Time Frame: During procedure

Feasibility endpoint is evaluated during and after the procedure:

- Number of ablations, whether a DMR was successful (>3 ablations)

During procedure
Feasibility endpoint 2
Time Frame: During procedure

Feasibility endpoint is evaluated during and after the procedure:

- Procedure time, defined as time between catheter in and catheter out.

During procedure
Efficacy endpoint 1
Time Frame: 24 weeks post DMR/sham

Efficacy is evaluated at 24 weeks compared to baseline and sham:

- Mean change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)/Flash Glucose Monitoring (FGM)

24 weeks post DMR/sham
Efficacy endpoint 2
Time Frame: 24 weeks post DMR/sham

Efficacy is evaluated at 24 weeks compared to baseline and sham:

- Change in HbA1c

24 weeks post DMR/sham

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Secondary safety endpoint
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Secondary safety endpoint is evaluated during follow-up and compared to baseline and sham at week 24 and compared to baseline and 12 weeks after (re)-DMR for all patients: incidences and event rates of hypoglycemic events during complete study period
Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 1: mean change in HbA1c
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 1: mean change in HbA1c
Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 2: mean Change in Fasting Glucose
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 2: mean Change in Fasting Glucose
Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 2: mean Change in Time in Range (TIR)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 2: mean Change in Time in Range
Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 3: In patients with baseline abnormal Alanine Transaminase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), and Gamma Glutamyl Transferase (GGT) values, change in ALT, AST, GGT
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 3: In patients with baseline abnormal ALT, AST and GGT values, change in ALT, AST, GGT
Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 4: Change in body weight
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 4: Change in body weight
Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 5: Change in Fasting C-peptide
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 5: Change in Fasting C-peptide
Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 6: Change in FPG
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 6: Change in FPG
Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 7: Change in homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 7: Change in HOMA-IR
Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 8: Change in Framingham Risk Score-Cardiovascular risk score (FRS-CVD)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 8: Change in Framingham Risk Score-Cardiovascular risk score (FRS-CVD)
Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 9: Change in MRI-proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 9: Change in MRI-PDFF
Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 10: Achievement of HbA1c ≤ 53 mmol/mol (7.0%)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 10: Achievement of HbA1c ≤ 53 mmol/mol (7.0%)
Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 11: Change in food intake (amount of calories, fat, carbohydrates, proteins etc.) based on intake registration data
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Efficacy endpoint 11: Change in food intake (amount of calories, fat, carbohydrates, proteins etc.) based on intake registration data
Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Mechanistic: Change in resection tissue findings in morphological features
Time Frame: Week 12 after (re)DMR
Mechanistic: Change in morphological features
Week 12 after (re)DMR
Mechanistic: Change in resection tissue findings in functional level changes
Time Frame: Week 12 after (re)DMR
Mechanistic: Change in functional level changes
Week 12 after (re)DMR
Mechanistic: Change in resection tissue findings in cellular level changes
Time Frame: Week 12 after (re)DMR
Mechanistic: Change in cellular level changes
Week 12 after (re)DMR
Mechanistic: Mean Changes in small intestinal biopsy gene expression
Time Frame: Week 12 after (re)DMR
Mechanistic: Mean Changes in small intestinal biopsy gene expression
Week 12 after (re)DMR
Mechanistic: Mean Changes in small intestinal biopsy metabolomics/proteomics
Time Frame: Week 12 after (re)DMR
Mechanistic: Mean Changes in small intestinal biopsy metabolomics /proteomics
Week 12 after (re)DMR
Mechanistic: Change in Plasma Citrulline
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Mechanistic: Change in Plasma Citrulline
Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Mechanistic: Change in Cystatin Value
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years
Mechanistic: Change in Cystatin Value
Through study completion, an average of 1 or 1,5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jacques JG Bergman, MD, PhD, Amsterdam UMC

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 9, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 22, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 16, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Clinical Trials on Revita® DMR Treatment

Subscribe