Sound Healing for Anxiety: A Randomized Controlled Trial

October 19, 2023 updated by: Consciousness and Healing Initiative

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to compare a novel sound healing approach, biofield tuning, to a waitlist control group in a healthy adult population naive to the intervention. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Is there a significant reduction in state and trait anxiety as measured by the State-Trait Anxiety Index (STAI) with biofield tuning compared to waitlist control?
  • Are there significant reductions in negative affect, as well as increases in self-compassion, positive affect, and interoceptive awareness in the intervention group?
  • What are the relationships between changes in anxiety symptoms, negative affect words, and microbiome changes in participants who have undergone this biofield intervention?

Participants will be:

  • Randomized to intervention/control
  • Recieve 5 sound healing interventions weekly
  • Asked to complete surveys and audio prompts throughout the intervention
  • Asked to provide a microbiome sample pre- and post-intervention

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

There is an increasing rate of anxiety among the US population, without adequate amounts of resources for treatment. Current pharmacological and psychological treatments for generalized anxiety disorder delivered by doctors, nurses, and clinical psychologists are often expensive and not freely available for many who need effective interventions for anxiety. A novel sound healing approach, Biofield Tuning (BT), has suggested potential benefits to those suffering from generalized anxiety. This intervention, while requiring training and certification, allows for holistic health practitioners to treat anxiety as a complementary mind-body therapy for those seeking relief for anxiety.

Intervention. BT is a non-invasive, non-medical therapeutic practice developed by Eileen Day McKusick. BT Practitioners use a tuning fork to identify off-the-body sites at which perturbations in the tuning fork sound are detected. Such sites are described by BT practitioners as storing health-related information within the human biofield. Practitioners describe the process of BT as assessing and clearing perturbations in the human biofield to foster healing.

Previous Feasibility Study. Our initial cohort study showed that conducting research for this novel sound healing approach online was feasible and suggested clinical benefits for people struggling with moderate to severe generalized anxiety, as noted in our peer-reviewed scientific publication. This RCT is designed to build upon the previous cohort study by comparing this intervention with a control group to further determine the effectiveness of BT compared to treatment as usual.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Lorna C Ciccone, ND
  • Phone Number: 512-284-3655
  • Email: lorna@chi.is

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be 18 years or older (≥ 18)
  • Biofield-tuning naive (have never had a session of biofield tuning before)
  • Speak and understand English at a native level
  • Have a score ≥10 on the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale
  • Have regular access to a computer
  • Have experience using a computer
  • Be comfortable using Zoom and completing data collection activities online and over the phone

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Suffering from any severe psychological, physical, or cognitive disease or impairment.
  • An active diagnosis or history of suicidality, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), schizophrenia, or psychotic disorders. This includes history or current suicidality, suicide ideation, and intent to harm self or others.
  • Women who are pregnant or nursing.
  • Having an electronically implanted device, excluding cochlear implants.
  • Currently seeking treatment for an active cancer.
  • Currently has an untreated serious illness (e.g. heart disease, diabetes, etc.).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention

Biofield Tuning is a non-invasive, non-medical therapeutic practice in which a resonating tuning fork is used to identify and re-balance off-the-body sites at which perturbations in the tuning fork sound are detected. The description of the intervention has been provided by Biofield Tuning Practitioners and thus describes the practitioner's experience and process while performing the intervention.

For this study, the Biofield Tuning practitioner will be using a "hologram" of the participant's body since the intervention will be performed remotely. A "hologram" is when a BT practitioner imagines the body of the participant on the table in front of them. This approach was used successfully for our last feasibility study suggesting an impact of the virtually delivered BT intervention on anxiety.

Biofield Tuning is a non-invasive, non-medical therapeutic practice in which a resonating tuning fork is used to identify and re-balance off-the-body sites at which perturbations in the tuning fork sound are detected.
Other Names:
  • sound healing
No Intervention: Waitlist control
The waitlist control group will complete the same weekly self-report questionnaires outlined in the protocol as the intervention group and weekly audio recordings. Following their one-month follow-up questionnaire, those in the waitlist group will be offered a BT session at no cost.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anxiety
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 5 weeks
The main objective is to assess whether virtually-delivered biofield tuning can significantly reduce moderate to high levels of generalized anxiety as measured by the State Trait Anxiety Index (STAI).
Baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 5 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anxiety 1-month
Time Frame: 1-month post-intervention
We also aim to understand how long BT intervention effects may last with a 1-month follow up as measured by the STAI.
1-month post-intervention
Positive and Negative Affect
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 5 weeks, 1-month post-intervention
as measured by the Positive and Negative Affect Scale-Short Form (PANAS)
Baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 5 weeks, 1-month post-intervention
Interoceptive awareness
Time Frame: Baseline, at 5 weeks
as measured by the Multidimensional Assessment of Interoceptive Awareness, Version 2 (MAIA-2)
Baseline, at 5 weeks
mental health recovery
Time Frame: Baseline, at 3 weeks, 5 weeks and 1-month post-intervention
as measured by the Recovery Assessment Scale- Revised (RAS-r). Scores range from 24 to 120. Items are rated from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate higher levels of recovery.
Baseline, at 3 weeks, 5 weeks and 1-month post-intervention
stress
Time Frame: Baseline, at 3 weeks, 5 weeks and 1-month post-intervention
as measured by the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Individual scores on the PSS can range from 0 to 40 with higher scores indicating higher perceived stress.
Baseline, at 3 weeks, 5 weeks and 1-month post-intervention
self compassion
Time Frame: Baseline, at 3 weeks, 5 weeks and 1-month post-intervention
as measured by the Self-Compassion Scale-Short Form (SCS-SF). The total score is an overall indication of self-compassion, with a higher score indicating more self-compassion.
Baseline, at 3 weeks, 5 weeks and 1-month post-intervention
perceived social support
Time Frame: Baseline, at 3 weeks, 5 weeks and 1-month post-intervention
as measured by the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS)
Baseline, at 3 weeks, 5 weeks and 1-month post-intervention
relationship with practitioner
Time Frame: at 1 week, 3 weeks, and 5 weeks
as measured by a Practitioner Relationship questionnaire
at 1 week, 3 weeks, and 5 weeks
depressive symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline, at 3 weeks, 5 weeks and 1-month post-intervention
as measured by the PHQ-9
Baseline, at 3 weeks, 5 weeks and 1-month post-intervention

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Spoken Language
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 5 weeks, 1-month post-intervention
As measured by a spoken prompt that will be recorded
Baseline, 1 week, 2 weeks, 3 weeks, 4 weeks, 5 weeks, 1-month post-intervention
Microbiome changes
Time Frame: Baseline and 5 weeks
as measured by a microbiome sample
Baseline and 5 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shamini Jain, PhD, Consciousness and Healing Initiative
  • Principal Investigator: Hemal H Patel, PhD, University of California, San Diego
  • Principal Investigator: Cassandra Vieten, PhD, University of California, San Diego

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 25, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 25, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RCT001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

No individual data or identifiers will be shared with other researchers.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

2 years

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Subject code blinded. Treatment code blinded and unblinded for analyses.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety

Clinical Trials on Biofield tuning

Subscribe