Secondary Obliteration of Old Radical Cavities Using S53P4 Bioactive Glass

November 1, 2023 updated by: Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht

Efficacy of Secondary Obliteration of Chronically Discharging Old Radical Cavities Using S53P4 Bioactive Glass

In canal wall down surgeries, the posterior bony wall of the external auditory canal (EAC) is removed to increase exposure. The creation of a so-called radical cavity comes with several possible disadvantages, such as higher rates of postoperative otorrhea and purulence, pain, adherence to water precautions and dizziness. Secondary obliteration of the mastoid cavity and reconstruction of the posterior wall of the EAC can help alleviate these symptoms. Our goal is to study the efficacy of secondary obliteration using S53P4 bioactive glass as obliteration material. This bioactive glass has several important characteristics, such as retaining of volume over time and antibacterial effects. The main outcome will be postoperative otorrhea as indicated by the Merchant grading scale.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

97

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Utrecht, Netherlands, 3582KE
        • Recruiting
        • Diakonessenhuis
        • Contact:
          • Phone Number: 088 250 5000

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients operated in our hospital between 2011 and 2022 for troublesome radical cavities that received secondary obliteration

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Old canal wall down cavity
  • Operated between 2011 and 2022

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Middle ear cholesteatoma
  • Previous obliteration

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients with old troublesome radical cavities
These patients would have old Canal Wall Down cavities that were troublesome
During revision surgery, all infectious material would be removed and subsequently the posterior wall of the external ear canal would be reconstructed and the mastoid would be obliterated using S53P4 bioactive glass.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number or participants with a dry ear pre- and postoperatively
Time Frame: At 1, 3 and 5-year postoperatively.
Postoperative otorrhea as indicated by the Merchant grading system. Grade 0-1 was defined as control of infection and grade 2-3 was defined as failure.
At 1, 3 and 5-year postoperatively.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pre- and postoperative air conduction
Time Frame: pre-operatively, in the first 6 months following surgery and 6-12 months postoperatively
Audiological outcomes pre-operatively, compared to early postoperatively (<6months) and late postoperatively (>6months). Evaluated in the audiometry is the air conduction in decibel.
pre-operatively, in the first 6 months following surgery and 6-12 months postoperatively
Pre- and postoperative air-bone gap
Time Frame: pre-operatively, in the first 6 months following surgery and 6-12 months postoperatively
Audiological outcomes pre-operatively, compared to early postoperatively (<6months) and late postoperatively (>6months). Evaluated in the audiometry is the air-bone gap in decibel.
pre-operatively, in the first 6 months following surgery and 6-12 months postoperatively
The number of patients with postoperative surgical complications
Time Frame: First year following surgery
Complications that occured within the first year following surgery
First year following surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: J.J. Quak, MD, PhD, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 18, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 3, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 3, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 16-004-1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mastoid Cavity

Clinical Trials on S53P4 bioactive glass granules

Subscribe