A PSM Analysis to Evaluate Electrical Pudendal Nerve Stimulation for PPI

Electrical Pudendal Nerve Stimulation Versus Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Plus Transanal Electrical Stimulation for Post-Radical Prostatectomy Incontinence: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

The goal of this propensity score matching study is to compare the posttreatment outcomes of post-radical prostatectomy Incontinence patients undergoing either electrical pudendal nerve stimulation or pelvic floor muscle training combined with transanal electrical stimulation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Prostate cancer is the predominant form of cancer in older males. Radical prostatectomy (RP) is the sole treatment that enhances both overall survival and cancer-specific survival.Urinary incontinence remains a major morbidity associated with this procedure, greatly affecting patient satisfaction following RP. Extant research underscores the efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) in improving the strength and function of specific pelvic floor muscles, causing hypertrophy of peri-urethral striated muscles, thereby increasing the external mechanical pressure on the urethra. Another promising physiotherapy for post-radical prostatectomy incontinence (PPI) is electrical pudendal nerve stimulation (EPNS). An increasing body of research focuses on comparing continence restoration outcomes between PFMT and various electrical stimulations. However, such studies encompass cases with multiple pathological characteristics, and the reported data might not be considered representative or applicable to other populations due to overlooked confounding factors or selection bias. Thus, the investigators intend to conduct a propensity score matching (PSM) study aiming to compare the posttreatment outcomes of patients undergoing either EPNS or PFMT combined with TES, while ensuring a well-balanced control for confounding factor.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

389

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Shanghai, China, 200030
        • Shanghai Research Institute of Acupuncture and Meridian

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients aged between 18-80 with post-radical prostatectomy incontinence treated at 3 tertiary academic medical centers between 2012 and 2020 were retrieved.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Onset of urinary incontinence at least 1 month post-RP
  • Minimum two documented incontinence episodes per week in a 7-day bladder diary
  • Pathological confirmation of no residual cancer post-RP

Exclusion Criteria:

  • High pathological risk factors (e.g., lymph node metastasis, resection margin involvement, bulky tumors)
  • Preoperative incontinence
  • Prior anticholinergic treatment
  • Urinary tract infection or hematuria
  • Postvoid residual volume exceeding 100 ml (determined by bladder ultrasound)
  • Neurological disorders
  • Urethral stricture

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Electrical Pudendal Nerve Stimulation Group
Electrical Pudendal Nerve Stimulation
The patient was positioned prone post-micturition. Long needles (0.40 Х 100 mm) were inserted perpendicularly, 1 cm bilateral to the sacrococcygeal joint, to a depth of 80-90 mm, eliciting sensations referred to the urethra or anus. The lower points, 1 cm bilateral to the coccyx tip, received oblique insertion of longer needles (0.40 Х 125 mm) toward the ischiorectal fossa (90-110 mm depth), inducing sensations precisely to the urethra. Connected to a G6805-2 Multi-Purpose Health Device, the ipsilateral needles created an electric loop, with the upper as anode and lower as cathode. Direct electrical stimulation (2.5 Hz, 25~35 mA) for 45 minutes targeted the pudendal nerve, thrice weekly for a minimum of 8 weeks. The treatment plan remains ongoing until the patient opts to discontinue voluntarily.
Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Group
Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Plus Transanal Electrical Stimulation
Electromyogram BF-assisted PFMT (using a nerve function reconstruction treatment system [AM1000B; Shenzhen Creative Industry Co. Ltd, China]) and following TES (using a neuromuscular stimulation therapy system (PHENIX USB 4, Electronic Concept Lignon Innovation, France)) at a current intensity of < 60 mA (as high as possible to get a PFM contraction) and frequencies of 15 Hz and 85 Hz (alternate 3-minute periods of stimulation) were performed by a specially trained therapist, 20 minutes each time, respectively (a total of 40 minutes), 3 times a week for a total of 8 weeks. The patients also conducted 30 maximal high-intensity PFM contractions for 2-6 seconds (with 2-6 seconds rest), 3 sessions every day at home for a total of 8 weeks. If the patient is willing, the treatment plan can continue until the patient voluntarily decides to stop.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-short form score (ICIQ-SF)
Time Frame: T0 (baseline); T1 (day after 24th treatment); T2 (day after 36th treatment); T3 (day after 48th treatment); T4 (day after 60th treatment); T5 (day after 72nd treatment).
The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) is a validated and widely used questionnaire to assess and measure the impact of urinary incontinence on an individual's quality of life. This part includes a set of simple questions related to urinary incontinence symptoms, which the individual answers. The questions address the type and frequency of incontinence episodes, as well as their impact on daily life. The higher the score, the more severe the condition.
T0 (baseline); T1 (day after 24th treatment); T2 (day after 36th treatment); T3 (day after 48th treatment); T4 (day after 60th treatment); T5 (day after 72nd treatment).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pad-counting Score
Time Frame: T0 (baseline); T1 (day after 24th treatment); T2 (day after 36th treatment); T3 (day after 48th treatment); T4 (day after 60th treatment); T5 (day after 72nd treatment).
the number of urine pad consumption in 24 hours.The higher the score, the more severe the condition.
T0 (baseline); T1 (day after 24th treatment); T2 (day after 36th treatment); T3 (day after 48th treatment); T4 (day after 60th treatment); T5 (day after 72nd treatment).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Siyou Wang, Shanghai Research Institute of Acupuncture and Meridian

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 5, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 12, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 14, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 13, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

If necessary, contact Dr. Siyou Wang to provide the original data.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urinary Incontinence Following Surgical Procedure

Clinical Trials on electrical pudendal nerve stimulation

Subscribe