Intra Oral Scanning of Edentulous Arches

April 1, 2024 updated by: Dina ElAwady, October University for Modern Sciences and Arts

Impact of Various Palatal Vault Configurations of Edentulous Arches on Scan Accuracy. An Invivo Clinical Study

the aim of this study is to compare the influence of different palatal vault configurations on the accuracy and scan speed of IO scans in cases of completely edentulous arches. The null hypothesis is that there is no difference in scanning time, and trueness and precision of IO scans between class I, II and III palatal vault configurations.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

A reference model will be created for each of the three groups with different palatal vault configurations. PVS material (DMG Silagum, Germany) will be used for impressions in a one-step process by an experienced operator, and type IV plaster (Heraeus, Germany) will be used to produce the models. These models will then bedigitized by an experienced operator using an extraoral scanner (Trios 3; 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark). The STL scan file of the maxillary model will be imported into CAD software (Meshmixer; Autodesk, San Rafael, CA, USA) to generate a reference file. Reference markers will then be added to the digital files to aid the superimposition process during digital subtraction operations.For intraoral scans, the entire maxilla of each patient will be digitally captured using an intraoral scanner (TRIOS POD, 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark).According to ISO standards, specifically ISO 5725-1, the accuracy of digital impressions obtained with intraoral scanners (IOS) will be evaluated according to two main parameters: trueness and precision.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Giza, Egypt, 12451
        • MSA University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All eligible participants who will comprehend the study's purpose and expresse their willingness to take part and sign a consent form will be enrolled in the study. The subjects will consist of dental patients who were seeking treatment for complete tooth loss in either the upper or lower jaw, or both. A total of thirty patients with complete edentulism, attending the outpatient clinic of MSA University, will be recruited for this research.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Full tooth loss in the maxilla; 2. Absence of infectious diseases; 3. Systemic good health; 4. Age between 50 and 75 years; 5. Willingness to cooperate throughout the data collection process

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria included: 1. Presence of any remaining teeth; 2. Inability to comprehend the study's objectives and procedures; 3. Palatal defect or lesion; 4. Postoperative scarring on the palate; 5. Limitations in mouth opening.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Class I
(medium U-vault)
intra oral scanning
Class II
(deep-vault)
intra oral scanning
Class III
flat vault
intra oral scanning

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Trueness
Time Frame: 15 days
Trueness is the degree of agreement between the digital impression and the reference scan. To assess trueness, we will measure the deviation between the reference and scanned files
15 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
precision
Time Frame: 15 days
Precision, is a statistical measure that quantifies the level of similarity between repeated samples within the same group. In the context of this study, the IOS impression STL files will be compared to each other in a manner similar to the previous comparisons
15 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dina Elawady, A.Prof, MSA University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

January 15, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 24, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 1, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Edentulous Jaw

Clinical Trials on digital impression

Subscribe