Preoperative Prophylactic Antibiotic Duration in Moderate to High Risk Ureteroscopy

December 8, 2023 updated by: University of California, San Francisco

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Preoperative Prophylactic Antibiotics for Ureteroscopy in Moderate to High Infectious Risk Population

The goal of this non-inferiority randomized controlled trial: is to test the hypothesis that the that there is no additional benefit from a longer course (7 days) versus a shorter course (2 days) of pre-operative antibiotics in patients with moderate to high risk of infection undergoing ureteroscopy. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Determine the safety and efficacy of a short course (2 days) as compared to a long course (7 days)
  2. Identify secondary predictors of post-operative infectious complications

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Post-operative infectious complications including urinary tract infection (UTI), systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), and sepsis are uncommon but potentially devastating complications after ureteroscopy. The clinical guidance from the American Urologic Association (AUA) and the European Association of Urology (EAU) is to provide treatment for symptomatic urinary tract infections however the management for asymptomatic patients with positive cultures or those patients who are otherwise at high risk of urinary tract colonization is unclear. As a result, there is significant practice variation in pre-operative prophylactic antibiotic prescription, even amongst fellowship trained endourologists, with some providers prescribing over ten days of pre-operative antibiotics while others offer none. This is a critical gap in our understanding of pre-operative prophylactic antibiotic utilization in a population of patients not only at higher risk of harboring multi-drug resistant (MDR) organisms but are also more susceptible to deleterious outcomes due to their frailty. Recent randomized trials have demonstrated that short courses of pre-operative antibiotics are no less protective than long courses in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for stone removal. Ureteroscopy is the most commonly performed stone surgery worldwide. Establishing an evidence-based approach for antibiotic prophylaxis in the ureteroscopic surgical patient population will be impactful for a large number of patients. The goal of this study is to implement a well-designed randomized clinical trial to establish the standardized antibiotic protocol necessary to minimize unnecessary antibiotic use which may otherwise lead to adverse reactions and proliferation of multi-drug resistant organisms.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

72

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94143
        • University of California, San Francisco
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Wilson Sui, M.D.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age (greater than or equal to 18 years)
  • indwelling ureteral stent in place
  • nephrostomy tube in place
  • indwelling foley catheter, suprapubic catheter or clean intermittent catheterization
  • asymptomatic bacteriuria
  • bowel interposition (such as ileal conduit, neobladder)
  • immunosuppression (such as for transplant recipients, active chemotherapy use)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy
  • active infection
  • received antibiotics within 7 days preceding surgery that were not prescribed for the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Short duration of preoperative antibiotics (2 days)
Patients will be randomized to a short (2 days) or long (7 days) of pre-operative antibiotics, the choice of agent will be dependent upon bacterial sensitivities if available which is standard of care.
Active Comparator: Long duration of preoperative antibiotics (7 days)
Patients will be randomized to a short (2 days) or long (7 days) of pre-operative antibiotics, the choice of agent will be dependent upon bacterial sensitivities if available which is standard of care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
infectious complication rate
Time Frame: 30 days after surgery
any occurrence of urinary tract infection, pyelonephritis, systemic inflammatory response syndrome or sepsis
30 days after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Non-infectious complications including readmission
Time Frame: 30 days after surgery
Any other complications after the surgical procedure such as pain, readmission, urinary retention, etc
30 days after surgery
Adverse reaction to antibiotic regimen
Time Frame: 2-7 days prior to surgery (depending on which arm the patient was randomized to)
Any adverse reaction to antibiotic regimen
2-7 days prior to surgery (depending on which arm the patient was randomized to)
Identification of secondary markers of post-operative sepsis
Time Frame: Obtained during the peri-operative period
Markers of infection will be drawn preoperatively including erythrocyte sedimentation rate, c-reactive protein test, intra-operative renal pelvis pressure
Obtained during the peri-operative period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Thomas Chi, MD, MBA, University of California, San Francisco

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 29, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

We have no plans to make individual participant data available to other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nephrolithiasis

Clinical Trials on Duration of antibiotics

3
Subscribe