A Novel Multisensory-Rhythmic Intervention in Geriatric Rehabilitation

August 15, 2025 updated by: National Cheng-Kung University Hospital

Linking From an Artificial-Intelligence Driven Assessment of Upper Extremity Motor Adaptation to a Novel Multisensory-Rhythmic Intervention in Geriatric Rehabilitation

Human performance takes shape from the dynamic interaction between person, environment, and task. Goal-directed action is a complex task, which requires the elderly to adapt their motor response according to the environment constraints and task requirements to accomplish the task goal. Among age-related problems, motor control deficits are often the main problems which restricts the frail elderly from maintaining independence for activities of daily living. Therefore, to preserve the quality of life, motor function of the elderly must be taken into consideration, including early detection of motor control problems and development of appropriate intervention strategy for persons with either healthy or pathological brain aging. Rhythmic skill training which is a new mode of dual tasks using rhythmic cueing as an external agent for facilitating an automatized motor task. During training, rhythmic skill training can provide multi-component of sensory stimulation, strengthen motor planning and optimize motor execution, therefore, it will improve the motor performance for the elderly or patients with mild cognitive impairment. In addition, the neuroplastic changes related to sensory processing, selective attention, or working memory demands through music rhythm training can facilitate the cognitive function for the elderly which is a current trend of geriatric rehabilitation. Moreover, the advantage of virtual reality is that it provides important information related to knowledge of result, which can induce better motor and cognitive training effects. Therefore, this research project will focus on assessing and intervening motor adaptation of upper extremity for the healthy elderly and patients with mild cognitive impairment. The first purpose of the project will analyze the difference in efficiency of responsive and predictive grasping motor adaptation among the healthy young adults, healthy elderly and patients with mild cognitive impairment through a test of perturbation-based of pinch-holding-up-activity, and use artificial intelligence for more accurate classification for the grasp pattern of healthy young adults, elderly and patients with mild cognitive impairment. The second one is to verify the effects of virtual-reality based rhythmic skill training system on the motor adaptation capability of upper limb and cognition for the elderly and patients with mild cognitive impairment.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

108

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Tainan, Taiwan, 704
        • Recruiting
        • National Cheng-Kung University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Hsiu-Yun Hsu, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score of 23 or higher,
  2. Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) of 0 (for normal subjects) or 1 (for mild cognitive impairment subjects),
  3. Healthy young participants aged between 20-39 years, healthy older adults and mild cognitive impairment participants aged between 65-85 years,
  4. No skeletal, muscular, or neurological problems in the upper limbs in the past year, and
  5. Sufficient visual acuity to complete the tasks.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any subjects with significant mental illness, central nervous system disorders, or medical history

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: virtual-reality based rhythmic skill training
Participants wear VR headsets and Oculus Touch controllers and undergo rhythm skill training for a total of 35 minutes.
Participants wear VR headsets and Oculus Touch controllers and undergo rhythm skill training for a total of 35 minutes.
5 minutes of breathing and muscle relaxation exercises
Active Comparator: rhythmic skill training with visual feedback
The rhythm skill training activities in this group are the same as the virtual reality-based system. Participants received 35 minutes of rhythm skill training presented through a computer interface
5 minutes of breathing and muscle relaxation exercises
The rhythm skill training activities in this group are the same as the virtual reality-based system. Participants received 35 minutes of rhythm skill training presented through a computer interface
Active Comparator: strengthening group
The patients receive an upper limb strengthening exercise program under the supervision of a therapist to ensure that the strengthening exercises are performed correctly. This includes: proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation, resistance training, and tendon gliding exercises.
5 minutes of breathing and muscle relaxation exercises
Participants receive an upper limb strengthening exercise program under the supervision of a therapist to ensure that the strengthening exercises are performed correctly. This includes: proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation, resistance training, and tendon gliding exercises.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in responsive grip behavior
Time Frame: baseline, 8 weeks and 16 weeks
To evaluate change in amplitude of pinch force development or adaptation to perturbation through a test of perturbation-based of pinch-holding-up-activity
baseline, 8 weeks and 16 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the results of Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test
Time Frame: baseline, 8 weeks and 16 weeks
To evaluate change in touch-deep pressure threshold of hands using a set of 20 nylon monofilaments with Semmes-Weinstein monofilament test
baseline, 8 weeks and 16 weeks
Change in the result of Purdue pegboard test
Time Frame: baseline, 8 weeks and 16 weeks
To evaluate change in hand dexterity of dominant hand, non-dominant and both hands with a timed-test
baseline, 8 weeks and 16 weeks
Change in the result of Minnesota manual dexterity test
Time Frame: baseline, 8 weeks and 16 weeks
To evaluate change in gross motor coordination of upper limb of dominant hand and both hands with a timed placing and turning test
baseline, 8 weeks and 16 weeks
Change in the result of Weber Two-Point Discrimination Test
Time Frame: baseline, 8 weeks and 16 weeks
To evaluate the change in sensibility of the hands
baseline, 8 weeks and 16 weeks
The change in the results of Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE)
Time Frame: baseline, 8 weeks and 16 weeks
To evaluate the changes in cognitive function in an individual over time with The MMSE test
baseline, 8 weeks and 16 weeks
The change in the results of Digit Span (DS) subtest from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-4th
Time Frame: baseline, 8 weeks and 16 weeks
To evaluate the change in working memory, mental manipulation, cognitive flexibility and attention in an individual over time with Digit Span (DS) subtest
baseline, 8 weeks and 16 weeks
The change in the results of Knox Cube Test-Revised (KCT-R)
Time Frame: baseline, 8 weeks and 16 weeks
To evaluate the change in short-term memory and attention span in an individual over time with a performance test
baseline, 8 weeks and 16 weeks
The change in the results of Conners continuous performance test-3
Time Frame: baseline, 8 weeks and 16 weeks
To evaluate attention related problems in an individual over time with a performance test
baseline, 8 weeks and 16 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 5, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

November 30, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 15, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • B-ER-111-482

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Virtual Reality

Clinical Trials on virtual-reality based rhythmic skill training

Subscribe