Virtual Reality-Based Simulation Training for Antegrade Anterior Column Acetabular Screw Placement in Orthopedic Residents

Virtual Reality-Based Simulation Training for Antegrade Anterior Column Acetabular Screw Placement in Orthopedic Residents: A Crossover Randomized Controlled Trial

The goal of this study is to find out if virtual reality (VR) training helps orthopedic residents improve their skills in placing screws in the pelvic bone. The study will also compare VR training with standard training to see which method is more effective and easier to use.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does VR training improve performance compared to standard training? Does VR training help reduce procedure time and X-ray use? Do participants prefer VR training? Researchers will compare VR training with standard training using a crossover design, where all participants receive both types of training.

Participants will:

Take part in both VR and standard training sessions Practice the procedure on a bone model Be evaluated by experts on their performance Complete a satisfaction questionnaire

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Bangkok
      • Bangkok, Bangkok, Thailand, 10300
        • Faculty of medicine Vajira hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Orthopedic residents (PGY 1-4)
  • Currently enrolled in the orthopedic training program at Vajira Hospital

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior VR training in pelvic fixation procedures
  • Experience performing antegrade anterior column screw placement more than 5 times
  • Inability to complete all study procedures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: VR Simulation Training → Standard Training (Sequence AB)
Participants first undergo VR simulation training, followed by standard training after a washout period
Participants train using a VR platform simulating antegrade anterior column screw placement. Three-dimensional pelvic models reconstructed from CT data are integrated into a virtual operating environment. Participants interact using a VR headset with simulated instruments and fluoroscopic imaging, allowing repeated practice with real-time feedback. Duration: up to 30 minutes.
Participants perform screw placement on a pelvic sawbone model under fluoroscopic guidance using standard instruments, including a 2.0 mm K-wire. The setup simulates real operative conditions. Duration: up to 30 minutes.
Active Comparator: Standard Training → VR Simulation Training (Sequence BA)
Participants first undergo standard training, followed by VR simulation training after a washout period.
Participants train using a VR platform simulating antegrade anterior column screw placement. Three-dimensional pelvic models reconstructed from CT data are integrated into a virtual operating environment. Participants interact using a VR headset with simulated instruments and fluoroscopic imaging, allowing repeated practice with real-time feedback. Duration: up to 30 minutes.
Participants perform screw placement on a pelvic sawbone model under fluoroscopic guidance using standard instruments, including a 2.0 mm K-wire. The setup simulates real operative conditions. Duration: up to 30 minutes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Global Rating Scale (GRS) Score for Technical Performance
Time Frame: Immediately after each training session
Overall technical performance score (range 6-36) assessed by two independent blinded orthopedic trauma experts using a validated Global Rating Scale. A higher score means better outcomes.
Immediately after each training session

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Procedure Time
Time Frame: Immediately after each training session
Total time required to complete the screw placement procedure (minutes).
Immediately after each training session
Fluoroscopy Time
Time Frame: Immediately after each training session
Total duration of fluoroscopic use during the procedure (seconds).
Immediately after each training session
Guidewire Reposition Attempts
Time Frame: Immediately after each training session
Number of times the guidewire trajectory is adjusted during the procedure.
Immediately after each training session
User Satisfaction (QUIS Score)
Time Frame: Immediately after each training session
Participant satisfaction assessed using the Questionnaire for User Interaction Satisfaction (Likert scale). This score contains of 9-point bipolar Likert scale, the analysis focuses on Central Tendency (Mean) and Variability (Standard Deviation). A Higher mean of the score indicates better outcome. Minimum score =1, Maximum score = 9.
Immediately after each training session

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Pornsak Nirunsuk, Faculty of medicine Vajira hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 22, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared. The dataset contains sensitive information collected from a limited number of participants within a single institution, and there is a potential risk of participant re-identification despite de-identification procedures. Therefore, data sharing is restricted to protect participant confidentiality in accordance with institutional review board (IRB) requirements.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Virtual Reality Simulation

Clinical Trials on Virtual reality based simulation training

Subscribe