Infection Consortium Study#1

October 23, 2025 updated by: Zimmer Biomet

Comparing Diagnostic Accuracy of Synovasure Comprehensive Synovial Fluid Testing to Clinical Guidelines for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection

In this study, the Sponsor wants to evaluate the performance and accuracy of the PJI Panel compared to the currently used multiple-criterion scoring systems for the diagnosis of PJI.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study aims to evaluate the performance and accuracy of the PJI Panel compared to the currently used multiple-criterion scoring systems for the diagnosis of PJI and will be executed as a retrospective review of existing data.

The Synovasure R&D database consists of PJI Panel test results digitally transferred from the instruments to a laboratory information system (LIS), (CGM LabDAQ, CompuGroup Medical, Phoenix, AZ), which has high data-integrity architecture built on an industry standard ACID (atomicity, consistency, isolation, durability) compliant relational database management system (RDBMS), Microsoft SQL Server. These PJI Panel data come from SF samples submitted to CDL from various clinics and hospitals for clinical diagnostic testing between 2013 and 2022 (CD Laboratories, Towson, MD). The data are deidentified in accordance with an existing IRB approval (WCG-IRB #20150222). The deidentified data includes the institution, ordering physician information, anatomical location of the aspiration, number of days from aspiration to receipt of the sample at the lab, age, gender, and results of comprehensive infection testing including: specimen integrity (red blood cells (RBC) and absorbance at 280 nm (A280)), AD, HNE, CRP, WBC, %PMN, MID Panel, and SF-Cx.

The Synovasure R&D database will be submitted to an exclusion/inclusion screening process to target samples for inclusion in this research activity. Subsequently, samples collected between 2017 and 2022 will be randomly selected for inclusion in this study. Classification of positive and negative samples will be according to the criteria for diagnosis of PJI using Synovasure Comprehensive PJI Synovial Fluid Panel as defined in Table 1. Only samples classified as Infected (positive) and Not Infected (negative) will be qualified for further enrichment.

Case report forms will be completed with data obtained through in-person or remote review of hospital and/or physician office records to enrich the PJI Panel database with the elements included in the 2011 MSIS, 2013 ICM, 2018 New Definition of PJI, 2018 ICM, and 2021 EBJIS definitions of PJI.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

810

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • Rothman Orthopedic Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patient tested for PJI through the PJI Panel at CD Laboratories (CDL).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Samples included in the Synovasure R&D database from patients tested for PJI through the PJI Panel at CDL.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • From Synovasure Database

    • Samples not submitted to CDL for PJI testing
    • Samples submitted to CDL from Institutions not participating in this study
    • Samples designated as being from anatomical locations other than "left hip", "left knee", "right hip", "right knee
    • Samples without SF-Cx results
    • Samples without SF-CRP results
    • Samples without AD results
    • Samples without WBC results
    • Samples without %PMN results
    • Samples with RBCs ≥ 1 million
    • Samples not meeting A280 specification for integrity: Remove A280 < 0.342 and A280 > 1.19
    • Samples received more than four (4) days after aspiration
    • Patient age < 18 From Institutional Medical Record
    • Patient who did not undergo surgical interventions after PJI Panel Testing
    • Synovasure testing performed less than 6 weeks after index surgery
    • Evidence of sinus tract communicating with the joint
    • Samples aspirated from patients using a spacer at the time of aspiration

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
CDL PJI Database
Patients tested for PJI through the PJI Panel at CD Laboratories (CDL)
The Synovasure Comprehensive PJI Test Panel (PJI Panel) is a laboratory-developed test (LDT) panel (CD Laboratories, CLIA Registration No.: 21D0216863) intended to aid the diagnosis of PJI.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Positive/Negative Percent Agreement between PJI RISC Panel and Clinical Guidelines
Time Frame: 1 year
The primary endpoint of this study is the rate of agreement (positive and negative) for the diagnosis of PJI between the PJI Panel and the previous and current clinical guidelines.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Positive/Negative Predictive Value of PJI RISC Panel
Time Frame: 1 year
The secondary endpoint is defined by the estimate of positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of the PJI Panel compared to the previous and current clinical guidelines.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Yale Fillingham, M.D., Rothman Institute
  • Principal Investigator: Paul Edwards, M.D., Bowen Hefley Orthopedics

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 10, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 4, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

September 4, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 22, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

December 1, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

October 27, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DTU2023-02DI

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on PJI

Clinical Trials on Synovasure® Comprehensive Infection Panel

Subscribe