Comparing a New Technique of Combining Carbon-dioxide With Electrocautery With Usual Technique of Stand-alone Electrocautery for Taking Down Left Internal Mammary Artery for Coronary Artery Bypass(CABG) (CABG)

December 7, 2023 updated by: Dinesh Kumar Sathanantham, Government Medical College Kottayam

A Comparative Study Between Conventional & Modified Carbo-dissection Techniques for LIMA Harvesting in CABG Patients

The goal of this study is to compare the efficacy of a new harvesting technique for an arterial conduit(LIMA - Left Internal Mammary artery) in patients undergoing Coronary artery bypass grafting. The researcher will compare the

  1. Time taken to harvest the artery
  2. Flow of blood between the two techniques

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Following consultation to our department, after a detailed history and clinical examination,patients with CAD, being planned for CABG, will be subjected to a detailed pre-op Echocardiogram and coronary angiogram. After necessary pre-op assessment, patient will be taken up for the surgery. Invasive monitoring will be done.

Following dissection of LIMA by the above mentioned technique, flow of blood from the harvested LIMA, for one whole minute is noted. The operative time required for the dissection of LIMA will be noted and entered.

The data between the two techniques will be compared statistically.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

46

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kerala
      • Kottayam, Kerala, India, 686008
        • Government Medical College Kottayam

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Elective CABG
  2. Hemodynamically stable CAD patients

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Re-operation, previous sternotomy (where LIMA is already dissected)
  2. concomitant valve operation, ventricular aneurysm resection
  3. other additional major cardiac procedures
  4. Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Modified Carbo-dissection technique
The carbo-dissection technique is performed using an improvised instrument that combines an electrocautery pencil (ValleylabTM Force FX electrocautery Pencil, Covidien, USA) with a CO2 mister blower (PerfX® Heart Lung pack Blower/Mister Kit, B L Lifesciences, Noida, India) and the instruments are fixed together using silk ties.The electrocautery is used in the coagulation mode at a setting of 10 to 15. The C02 flow is set at 2 to 3 litres/minute. Saline flow is adjusted to a level that does not hinder the effective coagulation but still prevents drying and desiccation of the tissues. Following the dissection of LIMA by the techniques mentioned above, blood flow from the harvested LIMA for one whole minute was noted(1 min post division of LIMA). The operative time required for LIMA dissection was also noted and entered. Patient's s demographic data were also collected and entered.
This technique comes the C02 blower with electrocautery. Thereby, producing vasodilatation due to the gas and dissection aided by the electrocautery.
Active Comparator: Conventional Arm
The conventional technique is performed using an electrocautery pencil (ValleylabTM Force FX electrocautery Pencil, Covidien, USA). The electrocautery is used in the coagulation mode at a setting of 10 to 15. Following the dissection of LIMA, blood flow from the harvested LIMA for one whole minute was noted(1 min post division of LIMA). The operative time required for LIMA dissection was also noted and entered. Patient's s demographic data were also collected and entered.
This technique uses only the electrocautery as conventional model

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Operative time
Time Frame: 10-20 min
Time taken to perform the harvesting of the LIMA
10-20 min
Blood flow/min
Time Frame: 1 min
Post dividing of the LIMA: blood from the LIMA is measured for 1 min
1 min

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dinesh Kumar Sathanantham, MBBS MS MCh, Government Medical College Kottayam

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 24, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

December 4, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The two parameters: Operative time and Blood flow/min between two techniques will be shared.

Co-morbidities data will also be shared

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on Modified Carbo-dissection Technique

Subscribe