Evaluating The Quality of Recovery After Elective Cesarean Section

August 2, 2024 updated by: Adham Haggag, Ain Shams University

Evaluating The Quality of Recovery After Elective Cesarean Section Using ObsQoR-10, A Comparative Study Between Two Modalities for Pain Control.

Adequately validated patient-reported outcome measures are available, which can assess recovery profiles following childbirth. This study will explore the effect of two different methods for pain management on the quality of recovery of pregnant women undergoing cesarean section

Study Overview

Detailed Description

  • Type of Study: RCT
  • Study Setting: Obstetric theatre at Ain Shams University Hospital
  • Study Period :6 months

As per routine hospital practice, the pre-anesthetic assessment is performed, two 18 G peripheral cannula are inserted and 1 mg of granisetron and 50 mg of ranitidine are administered intravenously (IV) as premedications one hour before the operation, and 10 mL/kg of Ringer's lactate solution was infused for 15 minutes as a preload. All the study participants received a standard spinal anesthetic consisting of 10-12 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine.

The patients will be monitored using electrocardiography, non-invasive blood pressure measurement and pulse oximetry (SpO2). Spinal injection will be performed under aseptic technique in the sitting position at L3-L4 or L4-L5 intervertebral space using a 27-G Quincke needle.

The patients will be laid down in a supine position and oxygen therapy will be initiated at a rate of 6 L/min via a facemask throughout the procedure.

The level of sensory block will be confirmed using sensation to cold, the accepted level for initiation of the surgery will be at T4-5level.

The motor block will be monitored using Modified Bromage scale. The blood pressure, heart rate will be monitored. If the systolic blood pressure reduced to 20% below the baseline or less than 90 mmHg, 5 mg ephedrine was administered intravenously. Moreover, if the heart rate slowed to 50 beats/min or less, 0.5 mg atropine was administered intravenously.

After the completion of surgery, the sealed opaque envelope containing the group allocation was opened by the attending anaesthesia resident (who was not a part of the study) to decide the mode of analgesia the patient shall receive.

In group QL: The parturients will be positioned in left lateral decubitus position. The back is cleaned with chlorhexidine gluconate solution and is draped with sterile drapes. The block is given using 21 G, 100 mm long (B Braun Stimuplex®A) insulated blunt tip needles. Patients will receive bilateral ultrasonography (USG) guided block with 20 ml of 0.25 % bupivacaine on each side. The block is performed by anaesthesia consultants having experience of 5 years in ultrasound guided blocks. The procedure will be performed using aseptic technique (gown, gloves, facemask and protective sheath for the ultrasound probe).

The curvilinear probe (2 5 MHz, SonoSite Turbo M) is placed in the transverse axial plane just cranial to the iliac crest. The "shamrock sign" was visualised (viz., the transverse process (TP) of vertebra L4 is the stem, whereas the erector spinae muscle (ESM) posteriorly, quadratus lumborum (QL) muscle laterally and the psoas major (PM) muscle anteriorly represent the three leaves). The needle is introduced using an in plane technique from the posterior end of the transducer through the QL muscle. The target for injection is the fascial plane between the QL and PM muscles.

In the PCA group: the PCA pump will be connected in a separate cannula. The pump contains 0.5 mg nalbuphine/ ml. the basal rate is 5ml/h and lock out time is 10 min.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

128

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 12245
        • Ain shams university

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification ΙΙ; and scheduled for elective cesarean section using a low transverse Pfannenstiel incision with spinal anesthesia.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (1) major hepatic, renal, or cardiovascular disease; (2) local infection; (3) bleeding disorder; (4) any contraindication for spinal anesthesia; or (5) known allergy to any drug used in the study (6) refusal to participate in the study (7) BMI > 35 (8) had opioid dependence (9) chronic analgesic usage (10) inability to use patient controlled analgesia (PCA) device.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: PCA group
: the PCA pump will be connected in a separate cannula. The pump contains 0.5 mg nalbuphine/ ml. the basal rate is 5ml/h and lock out time is 10 min.
the PCA pump will be connected in a separate cannula. The pump contains 0.5 mg nalbuphine/ ml. the basal rate is 5ml/h and lock out time is 10 min
Active Comparator: QL block group

. Patients will receive bilateral ultrasonography (USG) guided block with 20 ml of 0.25 % bupivacaine on each side. The block is performed by anaesthesia consultants having experience of 5 years in ultrasound guided blocks. The procedure will be performed using aseptic technique (gown, gloves, facemask and protective sheath for the ultrasound probe).

The curvilinear probe (2 5 MHz, SonoSite Turbo M) is placed in the transverse axial plane just cranial to the iliac crest. The "shamrock sign" was visualised (viz., the transverse process (TP) of vertebra L4 is the stem, whereas the erector spinae muscle (ESM) posteriorly, quadratus lumborum (QL) muscle laterally and the psoas major (PM) muscle anteriorly represent the three leaves). The needle is introduced using an in plane technique from the posterior end of the transducer through the QL muscle. The target for injection is the fascial plane between the QL and PM muscles.

The curvilinear probe (2 5 MHz, SonoSite Turbo M) is placed in the transverse axial plane just cranial to the iliac crest. The "shamrock sign" was visualised (viz., the transverse process (TP) of vertebra L4 is the stem, whereas the erector spinae muscle (ESM) posteriorly, quadratus lumborum (QL) muscle laterally and the psoas major (PM) muscle anteriorly represent the three leaves). The needle is introduced using an in plane technique from the posterior end of the transducer through the QL muscle. The target for injection is the fascial plane between the QL and PM muscles..

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ObsQor-10 score
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative
compare the total ObsQor-10 score in both groups to determine which pain management intervention yields a better outcome.
24 hours postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
validation of ObsQoR-10
Time Frame: 24 hours
psychometric validation of the ObsQoR-10 score in a subset of Egyptian women undergoing elective cesarean section.
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

December 5, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

August 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 2, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FMASU R310/2023

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quadratus Lumborum Block

Clinical Trials on PCA

Subscribe