Additional Effect of Forward Head Posture Correction on Temporomandibular Dysfunction

May 22, 2024 updated by: Shima Abdollah Mohammad Zadeh

Additional Effect of Forward Head Posture Correction on Temporomandibular Dysfunction: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

The goal of this clinical trial is to test the additional correction effect of nerd neck on damaged jaw in people who suffers from jaw problems and nerd neck at the same time. The main question it aims to answer:

• whether the additional correction of nerd neck impact the jaw features of pain and function.

Participants will:

  • participants will be given the consent to sign first.
  • participants will be assessed to check jaw pain and function.
  • participants will be divided randomly into 2 groups.
  • Each group will be given the treatment sessions for 6 weeks.
  • participants will come back after 6 weeks for another last assessment. Researchers will compare regular treatment for Jaw with new device, regular only and dental treatment groups to see if there is improvement in jaw characteristics.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The relationship between the two conditions of forward head posture (FHP) and temporomandibular joint dysfunction (TMD) have been previously stated with comparing the craniocervical angle (CVA) of TMD patients to the healthy individuals, still a clear relationship couldn't be drawn due to different study limitations such as the lack of subdivision in the TMD patients based on their diagnostic subcategories in addition to, patients' posture might have been altered while the photo was captured. Ever since, multiple researchers deliberately investigated the two conditions association and inferred the following: 1. FHP can be a risk factor resulting in TMD where any alteration in the head position produces more tension on the masticatory muscles by changing the mandible position 2. TMD origins from muscular component is more significant than articular component yet the correlation between head posture and TMD is still not clear enough, however, if FHP and myogenic TMD were linked preventive measures can be taken. recently, multiple studies established a relation between the occurrence of FHP in TMD patients which supported the suspected relation between them but without a clear association. Till present, no study has investigated the additional effect of FHP DCTO correction impact on myogenic TMD, and this is where the purpose of this study arises from.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

42

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The participant experiencing one or more of TMD signs or symptoms and has been diagnosed with TMD beside having forward head posture with craniocervical (CVA) angle < 50.
  • The study will be limited to the patients in the dental clinic of the university of Sharjah.
  • Participants experiencing mild to moderate myogenic TMD with symptoms of orofacial pain and limited range of jaw opening.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous head, neck or TMJ traumas.
  • History of temporomandibular joint surgery.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Conservative with Denneroll

Participants will be supine lining with the orthotic will be placed under participants' neck.

Treatment session time begin with 3 minutes then increase of 2-3 minutes until they reach 15 to 20 minutes in each session with the conservative management for TMD.

Denneroll cervical traction orthodontic traction for 3 to 15 minutes once daily with conservative management of stretching and relaxation.
Active Comparator: Conservative
consists of teaching the patient the relaxed jaw position and stretching exercises for masseter and pterygoid muscles with hold of 20-30 seconds and 3-5 repetitions. In addition to placebo traction.
conservative management of stretching and relaxation with placebo traction.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anamnestic questionnaire by Fonseca
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), 3rd and week 7 (post-treatment)
To evaluate TMD by 10 questions with their corresponding scores from 0 to 10
Baseline (pre-treatment), 3rd and week 7 (post-treatment)
Craniocervical angle - CVA
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), 3rd and week 7 (post-treatment)
photographic method to evaluate the angle where an angle less than 50 degrees will be considered as forward head posture
Baseline (pre-treatment), 3rd and week 7 (post-treatment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Boley Gauge
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), 3rd and week 7 (post-treatment)
Electronic Digital Caliper to assess mouth opening (active/passive)
Baseline (pre-treatment), 3rd and week 7 (post-treatment)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), 3rd and week 7 (post-treatment)
0-10 scale (zero represents no pain and 10 is the worst pain ever) to record orofacial pain
Baseline (pre-treatment), 3rd and week 7 (post-treatment)
Mandibular Opening
Time Frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), 3rd and week 7 (post-treatment)
Tape to measure the distance between the incisal edges of upper and lower teeth
Baseline (pre-treatment), 3rd and week 7 (post-treatment)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 24, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

December 5, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

No plan to make individual participant data (IPD) available to other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Temporomandibular Disorder

Clinical Trials on Conservative with Denneroll

Subscribe