Effects of IASTM With and Without CT on Pain, ROM, and Functional Disability in Post-Operative Knee Stiffness Patients

January 28, 2025 updated by: Sawera Ali, University of Lahore

Effects of Instrumental Soft Tissue Mobilization Technique With and Without Conservative Treatment on Pain , Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Post Operative Knee Stiffness Patients

This single-blinded randomized control study aimed to determine the effects of instrumental soft tissue mobilization technique with and without conservative treatment in post-operative knee stiffness patients. This study recruited 84 participants who fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were randomly divided into experimental and control groups using the lottery method. The assessor was unaware of the treatment given to both groups. Data were collected at baseline, at the end of the third week, and at the end of the sixth week. Baseline assessments were conducted before the intervention. Post-intervention assessments were conducted immediately after the intervention. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of IASTM, both with and without traditional conservative treatment methods, in improving pain, range of motion, and functional ability in patients experiencing post-operative knee stiffness. By examining these factors, we gained valuable insights into the potential of IASTM as a therapeutic intervention for this challenging condition.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) is emerging as a valuable tool for physiotherapists, offering a range of benefits for both practitioners and patients. By integrating IASTM with traditional methods, physiotherapists can elevate the standard of care, improve patient outcomes, and even contribute to a healthier community.

Study Design:

  • Randomized Control Trial

Screening:

  • Patients were screened to meet inclusion criteria. The consent form was taken from patients and then randomly allocated into two groups ( 42 in each group).

Randomization:

  • Patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into experimental and control groups using the lottery method.

Blinding:

  • The study was single-blinded. The assessor was unaware of the treatment given to both groups.

Assessment:

  • Data was collected at baseline, at the end of the third week and the end of 6th week. Baseline assessments were conducted before the intervention. Post-intervention assessments were conducted immediately after the intervention.

Intervention:

  • Group A (Instrumental Soft Tissue Mobilization Technique with Conservative Treatment)
  • Group B (Conservative Treatment Only)

Progress Monitoring:

  • Treatment intensity and exercise difficulty were progressively adjusted for both groups throughout the intervention based on participant tolerance and progress.

Ethical Considerations:

  • This study has received ethical approval from the Institutional Review Board (IRB). Informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Data Analysis:

  • Statistical software was used to analyze the data, with appropriate tests employed based on data normality to compare outcomes between groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

84

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab
      • Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan, 54590
        • University of Lahore

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants aged 25 to 50 years (Meena et al., 2023)
  • Participants of both genders (Meena et al., 2023)
  • Participants who have undergone post-operative knee stiffness surgery (Meena et al., 2023)
  • Patients having knee fracture (Poliakov et al., 2020).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with total knee replacement (Poliakov et al., 2020).
  • Participants with knee osteoarthritis or other knee conditions not related to post-operative knee stiffness (Meena et al., 2023)
  • Participants with other joint conditions not related to the knee (Mezey et al., 2023)
  • Post-operative knee stiffness patients with comorbidities that may affect the outcome of the study (Mezey et al., 2023)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Conservative Treatment
For conservative treatment apply TENS for 10 minutes to administer a micro current therapy to participants. Than Stretching exercises ( Hamstrings and Quadriceps), Strengthening exercises (Quadriceps, Hamstring, Calf ), Balance exercises and Ice Therapy.

TENS: Apply TENS for 10 minutes on the greater trochanter and the area just above the lateral knee joint line, adhesive electrodes were positioned.

Stretching exercises with hold for 30 seconds. Uncross your legs and stand up straight again (Mubashar et al., 2022).

Quadriceps Strengthening: Perform exercises like straight leg raises, seated leg press and squats to strengthen (Lim & Al-Dadah, 2022).

Hamstring Strengthening: Include exercises like leg curls to strengthen the hamstring muscles (Lim & Al-Dadah, 2022).

Calf Strengthening: Perform calf raises to strengthen the calf muscles (Lim & Al-Dadah, 2022).

Balance Exercises: Incorporate balance exercises like single-leg stands on a foam pad (Lim & Al-Dadah, 2022).

Ice Therapy: Apply ice packs to the affected knee for 15-20 minutes (Lim & Al-Dadah, 2022).

Experimental: Instrumental Soft Tissue Mobilization Technique with Conservative Treatment

Apply TENS for 10 minutes to administer a microcurrent therapy to participants. The IASTM was applied for 90 seconds- 2 minutes on each muscle along with the stretching exercises. The intervention was applied 3 times per week.

Muscle involved:

  • Hip Adductors
  • Hamstrings
  • Quadriceps
  • Patellar tendon
  • Iliotibial band
  • Calf muscles.

TENS: Apply TENS for 10 minutes on the greater trochanter and the area just above the lateral knee joint line, adhesive electrodes were positioned.

Frequency: 3 times per week. Duration: 90 seconds- 2 minutes on each muscle (Purbia, 2023). Technique: A therapist uses Ergon tools to apply gentle pressure and strokes along the targeted muscles and fascial tissues. Different IASTM techniques, like stroking, raking, and hooking, address specific tissue restrictions. The therapist should continue the IASTM technique for 5-10 minutes, or until the stiffness in the knee is reduced (Mubashar et al., 2022; Purbia, 2023).

Conservative Treatment: Stretching exercises for the hamstrings and quadriceps to improve flexibility and reduce tension. Affected iliotibialband. Hold for 30 seconds. Uncross your legs and stand up straight again. Repeat four more times (Mubashar et al., 2022).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Range of motion
Time Frame: 6 weeks (baseline, third week and then at the end of the sixth week)
Range of motion measured using a goniometer
6 weeks (baseline, third week and then at the end of the sixth week)
Pain Intensity
Time Frame: 6 weeks (baseline, third week and then at the end of the sixth week)
Pain level measured using a visual analog scale. It consists of a 10-centimeter line with endpoints labeled to represent the two extremes of the experience being measured. For pain, the typical endpoints are "no pain" on the left and "worst imaginable pain" on the right. For pain, a score of 0 means no pain, while a score of 10 represents the worst imaginable pain.
6 weeks (baseline, third week and then at the end of the sixth week)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional disability
Time Frame: 6 weeks (baseline, third week and then at the end of the sixth week)
Functional disability measured using the Lower Extremity Functional Scale. The scale consists of 20 items that assess the patient's ability to perform various activities, such as walking, running, and climbing stairs. The objective of the LEFS is to measure patients' initial function, ongoing progress, and outcome for a wide range of lower-extremity conditions. The maximum total score is 80, indicating no functional limitations.The minimum score is 0, indicating extreme limitations. The lower the total score, the greater the disability
6 weeks (baseline, third week and then at the end of the sixth week)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Asim Arif, M.Phil MSK, University of Lahore
  • Study Director: Alishba Mustansar, M.Phil./tDPT, University of Lahore

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 28, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 14, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 21, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 9, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 9, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

August 13, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The data will be collected from the University of Lahore Teaching Hospital, Lahore after taking informed written consent form through the questionnaires. A comparative analysis will be conducted between Group A and Group B, evaluating improvements in pain, range of motion and functional ability in patients experiencing post-operative knee stiffness. The data will be entered and analyzed using SPSS Version 24. The numerical data like age will be presented in mean ± SD. Categorical Data like gender groups will be presented in the form of frequency (Percentage). The normality of the data distribution will be test by Shipro's Wilk test and for between-group and within-group comparisons; p-value < 0.05 will be considered significant.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Instrumental Soft Tissue Mobilization Technique with Conservative Treatment

Subscribe