Effect Of Occlusal Materials Used For All On Four Mandibular Implant Prosthesis With PEEK Framework

November 28, 2023 updated by: Mohamed shady, Mansoura University

Effect Of Occlusal Materials Used For All On Four Implant Supported Mandibular Fixed Prosthesis With PEEK Framework

This study was performed to compare between the effects of different occlusal materials used for all on four implant supported mandibular fixed prosthesis with PEEK framework.

Methods of Evaluation

1- Occlusal force analysis using digital occlusal device (occluscan).

The evaluation periods will be done at time of insertion (T0),6 month (T1),12 month(T2) and 18 month(T3) after framework insertion.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

thirty completely edentulous patients will be selected for the study from the outpatient's clinic of Prosthodontic Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University.

The patients will be selected according to the following criteria:

  1. lack of satisfaction of mandibular conventional dentures due to denture instability.
  2. Atrophy of mandibular ridges with insufficient bone.
  3. They were healthy, free from any systemic diseases relating to bone resorption.
  4. All patients have sufficient inter-arch space >15 mm.
  5. Maxillary and mandibular residual alveolar ridges covered by healthy non-inflamed mucosa with even compressibility.
  6. Normal maxilla-mandibular relationship (class I Angle's classification).
  7. All patients will have mandibular bone height not less than 8-10mm as verified by cone beam CT.
  8. Sufficient inter-arch space not less than 23 mm as verified by tentative jaw relation. And restorative space not less than14 mm as verified by putty index technique.

Exclusion criteria included:

1- Systemic disorders affecting bone (such as uncontrolled diabetes mellitus and osteoporosis).

2- Local or general contraindication for surgical procedures. 3- History of chemotherapy or radiation therapy to the head and neck area. 4- Habits as heavy smoking and alcoholism. 5- Patients with T.M.J disorders or poor neuromuscular co-ordination.

  1. For all patient's conventional complete denture will be constructed and adjusted for insertion and delivery.
  2. A cone beam C.T will be done for each patient to determine the bone quality and quantity.
  3. A surgical stent will be designed and fabricated to allow accurate implant placement of two axially placed anterior implants and two distally tilted posterior implants by about 30 degree to support mandibular overdenture.
  4. Surgical placement of implant fixtures on its sites will be done.
  5. Multiunit abutments were screwed to the distal implants.
  6. The conventional mandibular denture will be modified to act as immediate fixed prosthesis that replace lost teeth and gingival tissues.
  7. After three months, the Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) frame that connects the four implants will be constructed using digital scan and CAD CAM manufacturing.
  8. The milled frame was fixed to the metal caps using DTK cement
  9. The BioHPP framework will have prepared abutments projecting from it. After processing, the framework will be tried in patient mouth for passive fit.
  10. Wax interocclusal record was made to establish the occlusal relationship with opposing teeth.

    According to the artificial teeth, the patients will be divided into two groups:

    • Group (I): PEEK framework veneered with nanocomposite resin(visio-lign)
    • Group (II): PEEK framework veneered with zirconia
  11. The inner surface of the artificial teeth will be etched using hydrophosphoric acid then silane will be used and light cured resin cement will be used for cementation of the artificial teeth to the PEEK framework
  12. The occlusal scheme used with the opposing maxillary denture will be lingualized balanced occlusion to enhance the stability of mandibular implant overdentures.

Methods of evaluation:

1- Occlusal force analysis using digital occlusal device (occluscan).

The evaluation periods will be done at time of insertion (T0), 6 month (T1), 12 month (T2) and 18 month (T3) after framework insertion.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Mansoura, Egypt
        • Mansoura University, Faculty of Dentistry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1- lack of satisfaction of mandibular conventional dentures due to denture instability. 2- Atrophy of mandibular ridges with insufficient bone. 3- They were healthy, free from any systemic diseases relating to bone resorption. 4- All patients have sufficient inter-arch space >15 mm. 5- Maxillary and mandibular residual alveolar ridges covered by healthy non-inflamed mucosa with even compressibility. 6- Normal maxilla-mandibular relationship (class I Angle's classification). 7- All patients will have mandibular bone height not less than 8-10mm as verified by cone beam CT. 8- Sufficient inter-arch space not less than 23 mm as verified by tentative jaw relation. And restorative space not less than14 mm as verified by putty index technique.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1- Systemic disorders affecting bone (such as uncontrolled diabetes mellitus and osteoporosis). 2- Local or general contraindication for surgical procedures. 3- History of chemotherapy or radiation therapy to the head and neck area. 4- Habits as heavy smoking and alcoholism. 5- Patients with T.M.J disorders or poor neuromuscular co-ordination.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PEEK framework veneered with nanocomposite resin(visio-lign)
patients recieved 4 implants according to All on 4 concept then peek framework was delivered and veneered with nano-composite resin (visio-lign) as an occlusal material
4 dental implants placed in the mandible according to all-on 4 concept
peek framework screwed to multi-unit abutments of 4-implants
peek framework veneered with nano composite (visio-lign) as an occlusal material
Experimental: PEEK framework veneered with zirconia crowns
patients recieved 4 implants according to All on 4 concept then peek framework was delivered and veneered with zirconia crowns as an occlusal material
4 dental implants placed in the mandible according to all-on 4 concept
peek framework screwed to multi-unit abutments of 4-implants
peek framework covered with zirconia crowns as an occlusal material

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
occlusal stability
Time Frame: The evaluation periods will be done at time of insertion (T0), 6 month (T1), 12 month (T2) and 18 month (T3) after framework insertion
Occlusal stability using digital occlusal device (occlusense)
The evaluation periods will be done at time of insertion (T0), 6 month (T1), 12 month (T2) and 18 month (T3) after framework insertion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mansoura U Faculty of dentistry, Mansoura University Faculty of Dentistry, Prosthodontics department

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 20, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 4, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

October 10, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 28, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2023

First Posted (Estimated)

December 6, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 6, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • A03021121

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Occlusal Trauma

Clinical Trials on dental implants

Subscribe