Improved Image Quality for Assessment of Carotid Artery Stenosis by Ultrafast Ultrasound FLOW Imaging (CAS-iFLOW)

March 18, 2025 updated by: Radboud University Medical Center

Objective: To evaluate the technical performance of a novel cascaded wave imaging technique compared to plane wave imaging for blood flow imaging in patients with and without carotid artery stenosis.

Study design: Observational, feasibility study in a total of 10 patients with and 10 patients without a hemodynamic significant carotid artery plaque.

Intervention (observational): all participants will undergo a carotid ultrasound measurement including conventional duplex ultrasound and ultrasound based flow imaging using plane waves and cascaded waves.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nijmegen, Netherlands
        • Radboud University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

10 patients with and 10 patients without a hemodynamic significant carotid artery stenosis

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Capacitated adult male or female (≥18 years old);
  • Informed consent form understood and signed;
  • Recent conventional duplex measurement of the carotid artery confirming either the absence or presence of a plaque

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hampered carotid blood flow imaging during conventional duplex/doppler measurements due to near to total carotid occlusion at the side of interest or a calcified plaque;
  • History of radiation at the head-neck area;
  • Participating in another clinical study, interfering on outcomes.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Participants with a hemodynamic significant carotid artery stenosis
Conventional carotid duplex measurement
Ultrasound-based flow imaging using plane wave imaging
Ultrasound-based flow imaging using cascaded wave imaging
Participants without a hemodynamic significant carotid artery stenosis
Conventional carotid duplex measurement
Ultrasound-based flow imaging using plane wave imaging
Ultrasound-based flow imaging using cascaded wave imaging

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
2D velocity vector fields obtained by plane wave and cascaded wave imaging of the carotid artery
Time Frame: After study completion, average of one year
After study completion, average of one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Signal-to-noise ratio obtained from plane wave and cascaded wave imaging will be obtained and compared for different vessel depths
Time Frame: After study completion, average of one year
After study completion, average of one year
Cross-correlation maps of plane wave and cascaded wave imaging will be obtained and compared for different vessel depths
Time Frame: After study completion, average of one year
After study completion, average of one year
Velocity vector fields obtained from plane wave and cascaded wave imaging will be obtained and compared
Time Frame: After study completion, average of one year
After study completion, average of one year
Blood-flow related parameters, including vector complexity and vorticity, will be calculated from 2D velocity fields.
Time Frame: After study completion, average of one year
After study completion, average of one year
Spatiotemporal blood flow profiles obtained with plane wave, cascaded wave and conventional duplex ultrasound will be compared to assess the correlation between these techniques
Time Frame: After study completion, average of one year
After study completion, average of one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 16, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 10, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

March 10, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 13, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

December 14, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carotid Artery Stenosis

Clinical Trials on Conventional duplex

Subscribe