SECURE Trial: Stress Echocardiography With Carotid Ultrasound vs Routine CT Coronary Angiography in Chronic Coronary Syndrome for Endpoints (SECURE)

November 20, 2025 updated by: London North West Healthcare NHS Trust

Stress Echocardiography With Carotid Ultrasound vs Routine CT Coronary Angiography in Suspected Chronic Coronary Syndrome for the Detection of Obstructive Coronary Disease and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes.

Diseases of the heart and circulation are known as cardiovascular diseases, and they cause over 160,000 deaths each year.

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the most common cardiovascular disease. This is due to a build-up of fatty material, known as atherosclerosis, in the blood vessels supplying blood to the heart muscle. This can cause chest pain or if blocked, can cause a heart attack.

Two of the main non-invasive tests to look for coronary heart disease are Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography (CTCA) and Stress Echocardiography (Ultrasound scan).

CTCA shows the arteries and allows small amounts of disease to be seen that may not yet be causing any symptoms. However, if there's lots of disease and calcification, it becomes difficult to tell how severe it is, which means several tests may be needed. Stress Echocardiography shows if enough blood is reaching the heart muscle, so can show if there is severe disease that needs treatment. However, it can't see the arteries so doesn't showt small disease that may benefit from tablet treatment. There is not yet an effective non-invasive combined test that can give all this information in one go.

Studies have shown that if there's atherosclerosis in another artery, a person is very likely to have coronary atherosclerosis as well. Carotid atherosclerosis, in the neck arteries, can be seen with ultrasound similar to stress echocardiography. So, by combining these two tests the investigators want to see if it is possible to see severe as well as small areas of disease in one test, to provide better treatment.

The study will enrol 2,000 participants, who need investigation for CHD, equally randomised to CTCA or stress echocardiography with carotid ultrasound. We will follow these participants for 5 years and observe for any adverse outcomes and ask them to complete a questionnaire.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

2000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age > 18 years old
  2. Patients referred to RACPC and judged by the reviewer to require a further imaging investigation, either SE or CTCA, to evaluate a suspected diagnosis of CAD
  3. AND

    1. Have a PTP score ≥ 5%, as calculated using ESC guidelines OR
    2. Have clinical history in keeping with 'typical' angina symptoms, as judged by the investigator, in patients with a PTP score <5% - With 'typical' symptoms, as per ESC guidelines, being all three of the following

    i) Constricting symptoms in the front of the chest or in the neck, jaw, shoulder or arm ii) Precipitated by physical exertion iii) Relieved by rest or nitrates within 5 minutes

  4. Able to give informed consent to participate in the study and its follow up

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with diagnosed ACS that require urgent or emergency treatment or hospitalisation for inpatient investigations.
  2. Known history of obstructive CAD (Previous MI, PCI or CABG) or previous invasive angiography with evidence of ≥ 50% stenosis in any epicardial vessel.
  3. Patients who have undergone invasive or non-invasive, functional or anatomical (Including CAC score) testing for detection of CAD within the previous 1 year of clinical assessment.
  4. Documented allergy to iodinated contrast or documented allergy to both ultrasound contrasts used at LNWH Trust; Luminity® (Perflutren) and SonoVue® (Sulphur Hexafluoride) or the constitutes
  5. Contraindications to undergoing CTCA, including but not limited to;

    • eGFR < 40 ml/min
    • Contraindications to beta-blockers including but not limited to, documented allergy or significant airways disease in the judgement of the investigator.
    • Exceeding CT scanner weight tolerance
  6. Contraindications to undergoing SE, including but not limited to;

    • Known cardiomyopathic process (Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM)) with resting gradient > 50mmHg or severe valvular lesion
    • Severe uncontrolled hypertension (≥180/100mmHg)
  7. Known pregnancy
  8. Unable to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Participants undergo the cardiac tests: stress echocardiography with carotid ultrasound
Detection of obstructive coronary disease
Active Comparator: Participants undergo the cardiac test: CT coronary angiography
Detection of obstructive coronary disease

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Detection of obstructive CAD and prevalence of MACE in enrolled participants
Time Frame: Within 3 months of randomisation confirmed by documentation in medical record
Within 3 months of randomisation confirmed by documentation in medical record

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of resource utilisation between study arms (subsequent downstream testing, cardiac related hospital visits, costs and incremental cost effectiveness)
Time Frame: Time to first event, up to 18 months post randomisation, confirmed by medical record documentation
Time to first event, up to 18 months post randomisation, confirmed by medical record documentation
Assessment of overall ionising radiation exposure (dose) between study arms
Time Frame: Within 3 months of randomisation, confirmed by documentation in investigation report
Within 3 months of randomisation, confirmed by documentation in investigation report
Major complications from cardiovascular procedures or cardiovascular diagnostic testing
Time Frame: Up to18 months from randomisation to time of first documented outcome in medical records

(a. Haemodynamically unstable new arrhythmia requiring emergency respiratory and/or circulatory support b. Anaphylaxis defined as a new severe reaction requiring emergency respiratory and/or circulatory support to administration of medication, including but not limited to; iodinated contrast, ultrasound contrast, dobutamine or atropine.

c. Major bleeding requiring a transfusion of ≥ 1 unit of packed red blood cells and/or further interventional procedures related to bleeding management.

d. Acute severe renal failure requiring ≥ 1 cycle of renal replacement therapy. e. Stroke defined as sudden onset focal neurological deficit with cerebral imaging confirming new stroke)

Up to18 months from randomisation to time of first documented outcome in medical records
Analysis of patient derived chest pain related quality of life (EQ-5D)
Time Frame: at 6-months and 12-months after randomisation on telephonecall questionnaire completion with patient
at 6-months and 12-months after randomisation on telephonecall questionnaire completion with patient
Change in prescription of preventative therapies (including statin and anti-platelet agents or dose increase of current statin therapy > 50%)
Time Frame: Up to 18 months from randomisation to time of first documented outcome in medical records
Up to 18 months from randomisation to time of first documented outcome in medical records
The proportion of patients undergoing invasive coronary angiography and revascularisation, of the target lesion, either through PCI or CABG, at follow up.
Time Frame: Time (in days) from the initial investigation until revascularisation confirmed by medical record documentation
Time (in days) from the initial investigation until revascularisation confirmed by medical record documentation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Prof Roxy Senior, LNWH Trust

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 18, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 31, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 14, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

December 29, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 21, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on Detection of obstructive coronary disease

Subscribe