Rolled Pericardium Versus Cryopreserved Allograft to Treat Native or Prosthetic Aortic Infection

January 8, 2024 updated by: Aurélien Hostalrich, University Paul Sabatier of Toulouse

While surgery with anatomic reconstruction of prosthetic aortic infections and native infectious aortitis has become established over time, the ideal substitute is not clearly defined. The cryopreserved arterial allograft (AAC) recognized as resistant to infections not only presents availability problems making its use complicated, particularly in emergencies, with a certain number of long-term aneurysmal developments. The tubulized pericardium patch (PP), available in all cases, seems to give promising results in recent literature. The investigators propose a comparative study of these two substitutes in this indication.

We carried out a two-center observational study including retrospectively from January 2010 to July 2023 all patients operated on for aortic prosthesis infection and native infectious aortitis with AAC reconstruction and prospectively PP patch reconstructions from July 2018 to July 2023. The diagnosis of infection was established according to the MAGIC criteria. The patients' preoperative comorbidities were collected to compare the groups. Postoperative morbidity and mortality was then compared. The medium-term evaluation consisted of comparing according to the Kaplan Meier method: postoperative mortality, permeability, reinfection rate, reoperation rate.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

150

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

patients operated on for a native infection or an aortic prosthesis who had pericardium or allograft reconstruction

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All aortic intervention performed for native aortic infection reconstruction with patch or allograft
  • All aortic intervention performed for infected graft reconstruction with patch or allograft

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Cryopreserved arterial allograft
Aortic infection treated by cryopreserved arterial allograft
In situ reconstruction with explantation of the infected graft or endograft and reconstruction by allograft or pericardium
Rolled pericardium patch
Aortic infection treated by Pericardium patch rolled
In situ reconstruction with explantation of the infected graft or endograft and reconstruction by allograft or pericardium

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mortality
Time Frame: day 30 post operative
Number of patients death during post operative stay
day 30 post operative
Reintervention
Time Frame: 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Rate of reintervention during post operative stay
30 days, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Post operative Major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE)
Time Frame: day 30 post operative
Rate of nonfatal stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and cardiovascular death
day 30 post operative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Permeability
Time Frame: 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Rate of reintervention for occlusion of the patch or the allograft
30 days, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Reinfection
Time Frame: 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months
Rate of reintervention for infection of the patch or the allograft
30 days, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 2, 2010

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 15, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 18, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 3, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 10, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Infected Aorta

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aortic Infections and Inflammations

Subscribe