Maturation of Arteriovenous Fistula With Automated Sonography Assessments Trial (MAFASA)

April 6, 2026 updated by: Sonavex, Inc.
This is a prospective, multi-center, two-arm, randomized trial to quantify the performance of the EchoMark®/EchoSure® System for AVF diagnostic ultrasound when used under a protocol of biweekly use for assessing fistula maturation and reducing time to Clinical Maturation.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

304

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Dothan, Alabama, United States, 36301
        • Recruiting
        • Trinity Research Group
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jason Beaver, MD
        • Contact:
          • E Ivey
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85004
        • Recruiting
        • Southwest Kidney Institute
        • Contact:
          • J Rodriguez
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Umar Waheed, MD
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85012
        • Recruiting
        • AKDHC Medical Research Services
        • Contact:
          • A Zabala
        • Principal Investigator:
          • S Wang, MD
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85754
        • Recruiting
        • AKDHC Center Tucson
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Z Yang, MD
    • Florida
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32806
        • Recruiting
        • Orlando Health Heart and Vascular Institute
        • Contact:
          • G. Nyo
        • Principal Investigator:
          • G Castaneda, MD
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Recruiting
        • Northwestern University
        • Contact:
          • J Kasperek
        • Principal Investigator:
          • V Rohan, MD
    • Kansas
      • Wichita, Kansas, United States, 67214
        • Recruiting
        • Kansas Nephrology Research Institute
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Dennis Ross, MD
        • Contact:
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02118
        • Recruiting
        • Boston Medical Center
        • Contact:
          • C Roddy
        • Principal Investigator:
          • J Siracuse, MD
    • Michigan
      • Lansing, Michigan, United States, 48910
        • Recruiting
        • MSU Health Care Heart and Vascular
        • Contact:
          • A Burghardt
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jordan Knepper, MD
    • New Jersey
      • Pennington, New Jersey, United States, 08534
        • Recruiting
        • Capital Medical Center
        • Contact:
          • L Gant
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Christine Lotto, MD
    • New York
      • New Hyde Park, New York, United States, 11042
        • Recruiting
        • Northwell Health
        • Contact:
          • Virginia Wairimu
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Yana Etkin, MD
    • North Carolina
      • Concord, North Carolina, United States, 28025
        • Recruiting
        • Atrium Health
        • Contact:
          • G Brown
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Christopher Mitromaras, MD
    • South Carolina
      • Greenville, South Carolina, United States, 29605
        • Recruiting
        • Prisma Health
        • Contact:
          • M Salle
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sagar Gandhi, MD
      • Orangeburg, South Carolina, United States, 29118
        • Recruiting
        • Medical University of South Carolina Health Orangeburg
        • Contact:
          • V Anderson
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mark London, MD
    • Tennessee
      • Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States, 37421
        • Recruiting
        • Galen Medical Group
        • Contact:
          • K Norwood
        • Principal Investigator:
          • S Phade, MD
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38115
        • Terminated
        • Fresenius Vascular Care Memphis MSO
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75226
        • Recruiting
        • Baylor Scott & White Heart and Vascular Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Stephen Hohmann, MD
        • Contact:
          • R Shabbir
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77058
        • Recruiting
        • Aqua Research Institute Llc
        • Contact:
          • R Rachal
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Rupal Patel, MD
    • Virginia
      • Arlington, Virginia, United States, 22201
        • Recruiting
        • HealthQare Associates
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Homayoun Hashemi, MD, FACS, RVT, RPVI
      • Roanoke, Virginia, United States, 24014
        • Recruiting
        • Physicians Care of Virginia
        • Contact:
          • A Johnson
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ryan Evans, MD
      • Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States, 23454
        • Recruiting
        • Sentara Health
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Samuel Steerman, MD
        • Contact:
          • S Havert

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males or non-pregnant, non-breastfeeding females ≥ 18 years of age but < 85 years of age at the time of informed consent.
  • Subject is able and willing to provide written informed consent prior to receiving any non-standard of care, protocol specific procedures.
  • Subject is willing and capable of complying with all required follow-up visits.
  • Subject and/or Care Team agree that the distance and transportation resources from the patient's home to the clinic are reasonable for study participation and compliance.
  • Subject has an estimated life expectancy > 18 months.
  • Subject is ambulatory (cane or walker are acceptable).
  • CKD Stage 5 (eGFR less than 10) or ESRD subjects presenting for upper arm autologous arteriovenous fistula creation that is not transposed for hemodialysis access.
  • Subjects who are currently on dialysis through a CVC or who imminently require dialysis (GFR <10).
  • Vein diameter ≥ 2.5 mm at the antecubital fossa per vein mapping.
  • Artery diameter ≥ 2.5 mm per vein mapping.
  • Subject is not participating in another investigational clinical trial that has not met its primary end point. Participation in post-market registry is acceptable.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • CKD Stage 1-4 or subjects that do not require upper arm autologous arteriovenous fistula creation for hemodialysis access.
  • Subject has history of Steal Syndrome.
  • Subject who is immunocompromised or immunosuppressed.
  • Subject has had three previous failed AV fistulae for hemodialysis access.
  • Subjects expecting to undergo major surgery within 60 days from the EchoMark implantation.
  • Known or suspected active infection on the day of the index procedure.
  • Subjects who had infection(s) in the 30-day window prior to EchoMark placement to reduce the likelihood of partially treated infections that can seed the device and fistula.
  • Subjects with diagnosed bleeding disorder, thrombocytopenia (platelet count <50,000), hypercoagulability, and history of recurrent deep vein thrombosis not related to AV access.
  • Subjects with active malignancy.
  • Subjects with a history of poor compliance with the dialysis protocol.
  • Subjects with a known or suspected allergy to any of the device materials.
  • Subjects with an existing fistula or graft.
  • Subjects who are anticipated to convert to peritoneal dialysis or undergo a transplant within 6 months.
  • Subjects who are pregnant, planning on becoming pregnant, or are breast feeding.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Diagnostic Arm
All subjects will have the EchoMark implanted. Subjects will be assessed every 2 weeks (+/- 1 week) (but no more frequently than weekly) with the EchoSure system until fistula maturation occurs and/or permanent access use is achieved.
Subjects assigned to the Diagnostic Arm will have the EchoMark implanted at the time of AVF creation. The subject will return every 2 weeks for a follow-up assessment to include an EchoSure scan until fistula maturation and/or permanent access use is achieved. The EchoSure scans are to be reviewed by the investigator(s) or delegated study staff and aid in the determination when a further assessment, including a physical exam, is required to determine cannulation clearance or if an intervention(s) may be required to prevent failure of fistula maturation. All physical exams will include assessing the fistula for bruit and thrill. The subject's medical history will be reviewed at each visit and will include all interventions, cannulation attempts, and adverse event reporting.
Active Comparator: Standard of Care
Subjects will be evaluated per KDOQI guidelines (with physical examination at approximately 2 weeks (+/- 1 week) and between 4 and 6 weeks (+/- 1 week)). If evaluation yields abnormal findings, subjects will receive a Duplex ultrasound assessment (DUS). All SOC Arm subjects will be followed per the institution's standard of care until fistula maturation occurs and/or permanent access use is achieved but no more frequently than once per month.
Subjects are assessed using standard of care per KDOQI guidelines, which includes a physical exam at the 2-week follow-up visit and at the 4-6-week follow-up visit. All follow-up visits will include an assessment of adverse events and medical history review to include all interventions, cannulation attempts, and laboratory results. If evaluation yields an abnormal finding, subjects will undergo a Duplex ultrasound assessment and treatment under the institution's standard of care. All SOC Arm subjects will be followed per the institution's standard of care until fistula maturation occurs and/or permanent access use is achieved but no more frequently than once per month.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary Safety Endpoint
Time Frame: 6 months

Freedom from the following through 6 months as adjudicated by the CEC:

  1. Clinically significant misplacement or migration of the EchoMark implant.
  2. Vessel or tissue injury caused by the EchoMark implant procedure of the implant over time, requiring surgical intervention.
  3. Infection of tissues surrounding the EchoMark implant requiring IV/
  4. Complication requiring explantation of the EchoMark implant.
6 months
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint
Time Frame: 6 months
Time to clinical maturation
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difference between EchoSure and Duplex Flow Measurements
Time Frame: 6 Months
Difference between log10-transformed EchoSure and Duplex flow measurements of blood flow for assessment of measurement agreement in the diagnostic arm.
6 Months
EchoSure Depth Comparison
Time Frame: 6 Months
Difference between EchoSure and CoreLab measurements of depth for assessment of measurement agreement in the diagnostic arm.
6 Months
EchoSure Diameter Comparison
Time Frame: 6 Months
Difference between EchoSure and CoreLab measurement of diameter for assessment of measurement agreement in the diagnostic arm.
6 Months
EchoMark/EchoSure System Technical Success
Time Frame: 4 Months
Technical Success defined as the successful implantation of the EchoMark implant and the ability to complete each scan to determine the blood flow, diameter, and depth measurements at the EchoMark using the EchoSure diagnostic ultrasound system from baseline to Clinical Maturation, fistula failure, or 4 months, whichever is sooner.
4 Months
CVC Removal
Time Frame: 6 Months
Time to CVC removal by subject group
6 Months
Rate of Hospitalization
Time Frame: 6 Months
Rate of hospitalization(s) by subject group from baseline to Clinical Maturation.
6 Months
AV Fistula Maturation Rate
Time Frame: 6 Months
Percent of AVFs created that mature by 180 days by subject group.
6 Months
Total Cost of Care
Time Frame: 6 Months
Total cost of care, defined by National average Medicare payment rate (facility and professional fees) for procedures and care provided to subject by subject group from baseline to Clinical Maturation.
6 Months
Freedom from Events through 30 and 90 Days
Time Frame: 30 Days and 90 Days

Freedom from the following through 30 and 90 days from the baseline procedure as adjudicated by the CEC:

  1. Clinically significant misplacement or migration of the EchoMark implant.
  2. Vessel or tissue injury caused by the EchoMark implant procedure of the implant over time, requiring surgical intervention.
  3. Infection of tissues surrounding the EchoMark implant requiring IV antibiotic treatment.
  4. Complication requiring explantation of the EchoMark implant.
30 Days and 90 Days

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of Composite and Stratified MAE Rates
Time Frame: 6 Months and 12 Months

Comparison of composite and stratified MAE rates for both subject groups at 6 months and end of study. MAEs are adjudicated by the CEC and defined as any of the following:

  1. Clinically significant misplacement or migration of the EchoMark implant.
  2. Vessel or tissue injury caused by the EchoMark implant procedure or the implant over time, requiring surgical intervention.
  3. Complication requiring explantation of the EchoMark implant.
  4. Clinically significant surgical complications (seroma, edema, hematoma, bleeding), excluding expected resorption response visible as hypoechoic region on B-mode ultrasound.
  5. Infection requiring IV antibiotic treatment. Pseudoaneurysm.
  6. Thrombosis of the AVF circuit that requires an intervention (surgical or endovascular).
  7. Steal Syndrome.
6 Months and 12 Months
Comparision of Implant and Procedure Related Adverse Events
Time Frame: 6 Months and 12 Months
Comparison of all stratified implant and procedure related AE (as adjudicated by the CEC) rates between subject groups at 6 months and end of study.
6 Months and 12 Months
Clinical Maturation
Time Frame: 3 Months, 4 Months, 5 Months, and 6 Months
Percent of subjects that have reached Clinical Maturation (as adjudicated by the CEC) for each subject group at 90 days, 120 day, 150 days, and 180 days.
3 Months, 4 Months, 5 Months, and 6 Months
Cannulation Complication Rates
Time Frame: 12 Months

Comparison of composite and stratified cannulation complication (as adjudicated by the CEC) rates between subject groups for the following AEs:

  1. Infection due to cannulation.
  2. Thrombosis due to hematoma.
  3. Any other AE determined by the CEC to be cannulation related.
12 Months
Time to Clinical Maturation for Procedure and Device Related Events
Time Frame: 6 Months

Distribution of time to Clinical Maturation for both groups for each of the following procedure and device related categories presented as violin/box plots:

  1. Clinically significant misplacement or migration of the EchoMark implant.
  2. Vessel or tissue injury caused by the EchoMark implant procedure or the implant over time, requiring surgical intervention.
  3. Clinically significant surgical complications (seroma, edema, hematoma, bleeding), excluding expected resorption response visible as hypoechoic region on B-mode ultrasound.
  4. Infection requiring IV antibiotic treatment.
  5. Pseudoaneurysm.
  6. Thrombosis of AVF circuit requiring an intervention (surgical or endovascular).
  7. Steal Syndrome.
  8. No SAE.
6 Months
Primary Functional Patency
Time Frame: 6 Months
Primary functional patency at 6 months (as adjudicated by the CEC) defined as freedom from intervention on the AVF after maturation.
6 Months
Secondary Function Patency
Time Frame: 6 Months
Secondary functional patency at 6 months (as adjudicated by the CEC) is defined as freedom from abandonment of the AVF after maturation.
6 Months
Time to Clinical Maturation
Time Frame: 6 Months
Time to Clinical Maturation (as adjudicated by the CEC) defined as the time from initial fistula creation to Clinical Maturation.
6 Months
Time to Clinical Maturation for Each Fistula
Time Frame: 6 Months
Time to Clinical Maturation (as adjudicated by the CEC) for each new fistula defined as the time from new fistula creation to Clinical Maturation.
6 Months
Technical Success Cannulation Scans
Time Frame: 4 Months
Rate of cannulation zone technical success rate defined as the ability to complete each scan to determine the diameter, and depth measurements at the proximal, mid, and distal segments of the fistula using the EchoSure diagnostic ultrasound system from the 2-week follow-up to Clinical Maturation, or 4 months, whichever is sooner.
4 Months
EchoSure Diameter and Depth Comparison in Cannulation Zone
Time Frame: 6 Months
Agreement of EchoSure diameter and depth results from the cannulation zone at the 6-week follow-up compared to the CoreLab measured diameter and depth results in the DIAG arm.
6 Months
Intervention to Assist Maturation Rate
Time Frame: 6 Months
Surgical or Endovascular Interventions to Assist Maturation defined as the difference between groups in the proportion of subjects with surgical or endovascular interventions to assist maturation.
6 Months
Hierarchical Composite 1
Time Frame: 6 Months

Hierarchical composite of the DIAG arm and SOC arm comparing occurrences of:

Fistula creation success.

6 Months
Hierarchical Composite 2
Time Frame: 6 Months

Hierarchical composite of the DIAG arm and SOC arm comparing occurrences of:

Alive through 180 days.

6 Months
Hierarchical Composite 3
Time Frame: 6 Months

Hierarchical composite of the DIAG arm and SOC arm comparing occurrences of:

Freedom from SAE with 180 days (severity as a tie-breaker for SAEs with matching adverse event term)

6 Months
Hierarchical Composite 4
Time Frame: 6 Months

Hierarchical composite of the DIAG arm and SOC arm comparing occurrences of:

Earlier time to AV fistula Clinical Maturation with 180 days.

6 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 21, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 5, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2026

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetes

Clinical Trials on EchoMark/EchoSure

Subscribe