Randomized Study of Physiological vs Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Normal Ventricular Function Post TAVI (PHYSTAVIII)

March 30, 2026 updated by: Josep Lluis Mont Girbau, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

Ranodmized Study of Physiological vs Right Ventricular Pacing in Patients With Normal Ventricular Function Post TAVI (PHYSTAVI II)

Single-center randomized trial in patients with pacing indication (AV block) after TAVI (transfemoral aortic valve implantation) and LVEF> 50%, that aims to study the percentage of patients who improve at 12 months in a combined clinical endpoint.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

There is currently no evidence of the best mode of definitive pacing after TAVI in patients with preserved systolic ventricular function and AV block. Through this study, investigators intend to elucidate the best post TAVI pacing strategy, comparing the effect of right apical pacing vs. physiological pacing on the evolution of both echocardiographic and clinical parameters.

Investigators will include 24 patients without ventricular dysfunction (LVEF> 50%) and with AV block pacing indication after TAVI.

Patients will be randomized to 2 types of pacing (parallel randomized trial): physiological or right ventricular pacing (conventional).

PHYS-TAVI trial will analyze the following parameters in the 2 groups: survival; NYHA class; distance in the 6-minute walking test; hospital admissions; left ventricular function; echocardiographic asynchrony (strain and flash septal); NTproBNP; and quality of life/symptoms with the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire test (KCCQ-12)

Clinical, and echocardiographic follow-up will be performed for 1 year.

Inclusion of 24 more patients to those already included in the context of PHYSTAVI I (NCT04482816). Exploratory trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

48

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Lluís Mont, MD, PhD
  • Phone Number: 93 2271778 Ext. 2094
  • Email: lmont@clinic.cat

Study Locations

      • Barcelona, Spain, 08036
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Clinic De Barcelona
        • Contact:
          • Lluís Mont, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Successful implantation of TAVI according to VARC-3 criteria.
  • Indication of cardiac pacing due to AV block according to ESC Guidelines.
  • LVEF> 50%.
  • The patient must indicate their acceptance to participate in the study by signing an informed consent document.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ventricular dysfunction: LVEF <50%.
  • Transapical TAVI.
  • Participating currently in a clinical investigation that includes an active treatment.
  • Patients with left bundle branch block but without indication of pacing (AV block).
  • Life expectancy <12 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Right ventricular pacing
Lead placed in the right ventricle (conventional pacing).
Conventional pacing
Experimental: Conduction system pacing

Lead placed in the His-Purkinje system (His or left bundle branch) in order to achieve QRS shortening and physiologic pacing.

Crossover from physiological pacing to right ventricular pacing will be allowed in case of failed His bundle pacing or left bundle branch pacing.

Left bundle branch pacing or His bundle branch pacing

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical combined endpoint: survival; and improvement > 1 point in NYHA class or > 25% increase in the distance covered in the 6-minute walking test.
Time Frame: 12 months
Determine the percentage of patients who improve at 12 months on a clinical combined endpoint: survival; and improvement > 1 point in NYHA class or > 25% increase in the distance covered in the 6-minute walking test.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correction of global longitudinal strain
Time Frame: 30 days; 12 months
Global longitudinal strain assessed with two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography
30 days; 12 months
Change in left ventricular ejection fraction.
Time Frame: 12 months.
Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF %) measured with Simpson method with echocardiography (Delta left ventricular ejection fraction: 12 months LVEF - baseline LVEF).
12 months.
Correction of echocardiographic asynchrony: septal flash expressed in mm.
Time Frame: 30 days; 12 months.
Correction of septal flash determined with echocardiography (M mode).
30 days; 12 months.
Distance covered in the 6-minute walking test.
Time Frame: 30 days; 12 months.
Distance in meters walked in 6 minutes.
30 days; 12 months.
Change in NYHA (New York Heart Association) functional class.
Time Frame: 30 days; 12 months.
NYHA functional class I, II, III, IV.
30 days; 12 months.
Change in degree of mitral regurgitation.
Time Frame: 30 days; 12 months.
Mitral regurgitation (MR) measured with echocardiography. The severity of MR graded as absent (0), mild (1), moderate (2), moderate-severe (3), or severe (4).
30 days; 12 months.
Change in NTproBNP.
Time Frame: Baseline; 12 months.
NTproBNP blood levels.
Baseline; 12 months.
Hospitalization due to heart failure.
Time Frame: 12 months.
Hospitalization: patient hospitalization (yes/no).
12 months.
QRS duration.
Time Frame: Baseline
QRS duration (milliseconds) measured with a 12-lead ECG (200mm/s).
Baseline
Score on quality of life/symptoms Questionnaire (KCCQ-12 Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire).
Time Frame: 30 days; 12 months.
Score in Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12: (higher=better).
30 days; 12 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Lluís Mont, MD, PhD, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona. IDIBAPS

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 30, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 15, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 9, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 9, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 31, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on AV Block

Clinical Trials on Conduction system pacing

Subscribe