Long-term Outcomes of Conduction System Pacing: a National Multicenter Observational Study - NORMAND'HIS / STIMU'HIS (STIMU'HIS)

October 12, 2023 updated by: University Hospital, Rouen

This prospective multicenter registry will evaluate the long-term electrical, echocardiographic, and clinical outcomes of conduction system pacing (CSP). There is currently limited data in the literature regarding the long-term results and benefits of CSP. The long-term maintenance of conduction system (His bundle or Left Bundle Branch) capture and physiological ventricular activation is an essential prerequisite for the expected benefits of this technique.

There is currently no prospective study evaluating the preservation of CSP during long-term follow-up. The design of the present study will allow reliable evaluation of CSP maintenance at 2 years follow-up. The prospective collection of electrical data (pacing thresholds, impedance, R wave sensing) during pacemaker follow-up visits will confirm thresholds stability over the long term. The incidence of atrial fibrillation episodes will also be precisely evaluated and will provide new information. Although pathophysiological studies have demonstrated less impairment of left atrial function with conduction system pacing, there is currently no data on the incidence of atrial fibrillation in patients implanted with a CSP pacemaker.

Echocardiographic data will be prospectively collected in order to analyse the evolution of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after CSP. This systematic follow-up is rarely found in CSP studies, often retrospective, with significant missing echocardiographic data. The hypothesis is that patients benefiting from CSP will not develop the deleterious effects demonstrated with conventional right ventricular pacing, such as left ventricular dilation and LVEF impairment. Inter- and intraventricular asynchrony criteria will also be systematically evaluated during follow-up echocardiography.Finally, this prospective cohort will also systematically collect clinical follow-up data (hospitalizations for heart failure and NYHA stage).

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

2500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Caen, France
        • Recruiting
        • CHU CAEN
        • Contact:
          • Pierre OLLITRAULT, MD
      • Elbeuf, France
        • Recruiting
        • CHI Elbeuf
        • Contact:
          • Fabian Tournevache, MD
      • La Rochelle, France
        • Recruiting
        • Groupe Hospitalier La Rochelle Ré-Aunis
        • Contact:
          • Antoine MILHEM, MD
      • Le Havre, France
        • Recruiting
        • CH Le Havre
        • Contact:
          • Nathanaël Auquier, MD
      • Lille, France
        • Recruiting
        • Chu Lille
        • Contact:
          • Christelle MARQUIE, MD
      • Lomme, France
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital Saint Philibert
        • Contact:
          • Guillaume VIART, MD
      • Rennes, France
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Rennes
        • Contact:
          • Vincent GALAND, MD
      • Rouen, France
        • Recruiting
        • Clinique Saint Hilaire
        • Contact:
          • Adrian Mirolo, MD
      • Rouen, France, 76 031
        • Recruiting
        • Rouen University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Corentin Chaumont, MD
      • Saint-Pierre, France
        • Recruiting
        • CHU Sud Réunion
        • Contact:
          • Gael Clerici, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients referred for conduction system pacing

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient who had undergone conduction system pacing attempt
  • Age > 18 yo
  • Capacity to understand the nature of the study, legal ability and willingness to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient under guardianship, trusteeship, or legal protection.
  • Pregnant woman (positive urine pregnancy test) or breastfeeding or lack of proven effective contraception (according to the WHO definition) or menopausal without confirmed diagnosis (non-medically induced amenorrhea for at least 12 months before the inclusion visit).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Freedom from major adverse events
Time Frame: 24 months

Major adverse events are defined as follow :

  • Lead revision (including infection and pacing threshold increase)
  • Lead dislodgment
  • Loss of conduction system pacing (i.e. loss of His Bundle Pacing or Left Bundle Branch area pacing according to standard definitions)
  • Heart Failure Hospitalization
  • Upgrade to BiVentricular pacing
  • All cause mortality
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
LVEF (%)
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
AF incidence
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
Heart Failure Hospitalization Incidence
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
CSP Threshold during pacemaker check (Volt @ ms)
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
Paced QRS width
Time Frame: 24 months
24 months
Interventricular dyssynchrony parameters
Time Frame: pre-discharged
Aortic pre-ejection time (ms) - Pulmonary pre-ejection time (ms) (echocardiography)
pre-discharged
Intraventricular dyssynchrony parameters
Time Frame: pre-discharged
Difference between the first and last left ventricular systolic peak using 2D speckle tracking (echocardiography)
pre-discharged

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 12, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2020/0417/OB

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Conduction System Pacing

Clinical Trials on Conduction system pacing

Subscribe