Conduction System Pacing vs Biventricular Resynchronization Therapy in Systolic Dysfunction and Wide QRS: CONSYST-CRT. (CONSYST-CRT)

August 16, 2023 updated by: Josep Lluis Mont Girbau, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

Conduction System Pacing vs Biventricular Resynchronization Therapy in Systolic Dysfunction and Wide QRS: CONSYST-CRT Randomized Clinical Trial.

Conduction system pacing vs biventricular resynchronization therapy in systolic dysfunction and wide QRS (CONSYST-CRT randomized clinical trial) is a non-inferiority trial that aims to study the composite endpoint consisting of all-cause mortality, cardiac transplant, heart failure hospitalizations, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement <5 points.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

To date, studies have shown that conduction system pacing could get similar clinical and echocardiographic responses to those obtained with biventricular therapy.

This study will randomize 130 patients to a strategy of biventricular pacing versus conduction system pacing.

CONSYST-CRT study will analyze the following parameters in the 2 groups: left ventricular ejection fraction, ventricular volumes, echocardiographic response (>=15% decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume), NYHA functional class, heart failure hospitalization, all-cause mortality, cardiac transplant, QRS shortening, echocardiographic asynchrony (septal flash).

Clinical, electrocardiographic, echocardiographic follow-up will be performed for 1 year.

The first 70 patients have been recruited in the context of the LEVELAT study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04054895)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

130

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Lluís Mont, MD, PhD
  • Phone Number: +34 93 2271778
  • Email: lmont@clinic.cat

Study Locations

      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Lluís Mont

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patient must indicate their acceptance to participate in the study by signing an informed consent document.
  • The patient must be ≥ 18 years of age.
  • Left bundle branch block, QRS ≥130 and LVEF <=35%. No indication of stimulation for AV block.
  • Non-left bundle branch block, QRS ≥150 and LVEF <=35%.
  • Patients with indication of resynchronization therapy for ventricular dysfunction (LVEF <40%) and indication of cardiac pacing for AV block.
  • LVEF <=35% in NYHA class III or IV if they are in atrial fibrillation and have intrinsic QRS >=130 ms, provided a strategy to ensure biventricular capture is in place.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Myocardial infarction, unstable angina or cardiac revascularization during the previous 3 months.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Participating currently in a clinical investigation that includes an active treatment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Conduction system pacing

Pacing the His-Purkinje system.

Crossover to biventricular pacing was allowed in case of failed conduction system pacing: failed His bundle pacing and failed Left bundle branch pacing (high thresholds (>3.5V / 1ms); no left bundle branch pacing criteria; no left bundle branch correction).

Electrocardiographic optimization allowed in order to obtain the narrowest QRS.

Lead placed in the His-Purkinje system in order to achieve QRS shortening.
Active Comparator: Biventricular pacing

Pacing from the right ventricular and coronary sinus leads. Electrocardiographic optimization with fusion-optimized intervals.

Crossover from biventricular pacing to conduction system pacing will be allowed in the following situations: coronary sinus cannot be cannulated; no lateral or posterolateral branches; or phrenic stimulation.

Lead is placed in a tributary of the coronary sinus.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Composite end-point: all-cause mortality, cardiac transplant, heart failure hospitalization, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement <5 points.
Time Frame: 12 months
Non inferiority margin 10%.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in left ventricular ejection fraction.
Time Frame: 6 months; 12 months
Non inferiority margin 2.5%
6 months; 12 months
Change in left ventricular end-systolic volume.
Time Frame: 6 months; 12 months
Non inferiority margin 3%
6 months; 12 months
Echocardiographic response (>=15% decrease in left ventricular end-systolic volume).
Time Frame: 6 months; 12 months
Non inferiority margin 10%
6 months; 12 months
Hospitalization due to heart failure, mortality or cardiac transplant (combined endpoint)
Time Frame: 6 months; 12 months
Non inferiority margin 10%
6 months; 12 months
QRS shortening
Time Frame: Post-implantation (Electrophysiology Lab)
Non inferiority margin 12ms
Post-implantation (Electrophysiology Lab)
Correction of septal flash
Time Frame: 15 days; 6 months; 12 months
Non inferiority margin 0.5mm
15 days; 6 months; 12 months
Change in NYHA functional class
Time Frame: 6 months; 12 months
NYHA functional class I, II, III, IV.
6 months; 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Lluís Mont, MD, PhD, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
  • Principal Investigator: Jose M Tolosana, MD, PhD, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
  • Principal Investigator: Margarida Pujol Lopez, MD, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 17, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 19, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

January 12, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 16, 2023

Last Verified

August 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CONSYST-CRT.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Resynchronization Therapy

Clinical Trials on Conduction system pacing

3
Subscribe