The Cardio-Metabolic Clinic (ProtecT-2-D)

July 2, 2025 updated by: Odense University Hospital

Cardiovascular Protection in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Established Heart or Vascular Disease - The Cardio-Metabolic Clinic

This study aims to investigate whether a Cardio-Metabolic Clinic can protect the cardiovascular health of patients with both diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

  • At the Cardio-Metabolic Clinic, patients will receive a specialized and comprehensive care. This includes applying a systematic approach, considering their whole health based on the latest knowledge in the field, and administering aggressive treatment with heart protective medications.
  • The ProtecT-2-D trial will compare the effects of care at the Cardio-Metabolic Clinic to usual care to see if there are any differences in cardiovascular illness and death.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Background:

Despite improved treatment options, cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of illness and death among patients with type 2 diabetes. It is crucial to recognize that managing diabetes involves more than just controlling blood sugar levels; preventing and treating cardiovascular disease is of significant importance. Lifestyle changes have been proven to have a substantial impact on cardiovascular health. Additionally, remarkable advancements in treatment options with cardiovascular protective effects have occurred over the past five years. Nevertheless, the traditional healthcare system primarily focuses on managing individual diseases, often leading to fragmented care for patients with type 2 diabetes. This fragmented approach often results in inadequate treatment, higher costs, and worse outcomes for cardiovascular disease. To address these challenges, our goal is to establish a Cardio-Metabolic Clinic that adopts a multidisciplinary approach to optimize diabetes management. The clinic will place special emphasis on implementing measures to protect the cardiovascular system and ensure comprehensive care for the patients. By bridging the gap between diabetes management and cardiovascular health, the aim is to enhance cardiovascular outcomes for patients with type 2 diabetes.

Organization in the Cardio-Metabolic Clinic:

The Cardio-Metabolic Clinic, structured on a cost-effective model, operates through a three-layered system centered on the patient. The innermost layer involves medical students or specialized cardio-metabolic nurses who maintain the daily contact with the patients. Patient medical history and baseline visit data are recorded in the Electronic Case-Report Form (Redcap). Upon randomization to the intervention arm, a decision-making algorithm in the Redcap-system is activated, ensuring that patients receive optimal and tailored medical treatment in accordance with the latest guidelines for diabetes management. The second layer includes a cardiologist who, in collaboration with the medical students or cardio-metabolic nurses, reviews the patients' risk profiles and algorithm-recommended treatments. If further counselling is needed for patient management, the third layer, consisting of an endocrinologist, a nephrologist and a hepatologist, will be consulted. This multidisciplinary collaboration ensures the most optimal diabetes management, especially in challenging cases.

Objectives:

The objective of the ProtecT-2-D trial is to investigate whether a comprehensive care in a Cardio-Metabolic Clinic are superior to standard treatment in reducing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Hypothesis:

In patients with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, a systematic, specialized multidisciplinary approach in a Cardio-Metabolic Clinic, will result in better management of diabetes and reduced cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Methods:

The ProtecT-2-D study is a prospective, randomized, controlled trial conducted at the Cardiovascular Research Unit in Svendborg Hospital, Denmark. The study population consists of patients with type 2 diabetes and established cardiovascular disease, referred from general practices or seen in the outpatient clinic of Cardiology or Endocrinology at Svendborg Hospital. Sixteen hundred patients are anticipated to take part in the study. Patients are randomized in a 2:1 ratio to either receive comprehensive care at the Cardio-Metabolic Clinic or standard treatment. All patients are invited to undergo a health examination at baseline. Subsequently, patients enrolled in the Cardio-Metabolic Clinic will undergo a thorough multidisciplinary evaluation, including an optimization of lifestyle factors and medical treatment of cardiovascular risk factors based on current treatment guidelines.

After a duration of 3 years, all patients will be invited for a follow-up health examination. Furthermore, complications related to diabetes or cardiovascular disease will be assessed through registry and journal audits after 5 and 10 years.

Outcomes:

The primary outcome of the ProtecT-2-D trial is to investigate whether comprehensive care in a Cardio-Metabolic Clinic is superior to standard treatment. This will be assessed by the time to first occurrence of any of the endpoints in this composite: Death from cardiovascular causes, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, and hospitalization for HF.

Sample size estimation:

A reduction in the primary endpoint of 15 % is anticipated in patients assessed in the Cardio-Metabolic Clinic compared to standard treatment. With a power of 80% and an alpha value of 0.05, 1306 patients are needed, and a dropout rate of around 15-20% is anticipated; therefore, 1600 patients will have to be included in the study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1600

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • South Denmark
      • Svendborg, South Denmark, Denmark, 5700
        • Recruiting
        • Cardiovascular Research Unit, Odense University Hospital - Svendborg
        • Contact:
          • Jess Lambrecthsen, Professor
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Soeren Auscher, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion:

  • >18 years
  • Capable of giving written informed consent
  • Established diagnosis of T2D
  • Having established heart or vascular disease defined as either:
  • Atherosclerotic disease defined as:

    1. Prior acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
    2. Chronic coronary syndrome defined as the combination of: Angina pectoris AND coronary atherosclerosis assessed with either Coronary CT angiography (CTA) or Myocardial-scintigraphy (MPI) or Coronary angiography (CAG) AND treatment with statins and/or acetylsalicylic acid.
    3. Stroke.
    4. Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) defined as: Claudication intermittence in combination with pathological ABI AND/OR vascular PAD surgery AND/OR ischemic amputation.
    5. Ischemic heart disease defined by one of the following criteria: a) Myocardial-scintigraphy: >10% reversibility OR b) Coronary CT angiography: Coronary Artery Calcium (CAC)-score >100.
  • Heart failure (HF): HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), HF with Mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF), HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF)
  • Atrial fibrillation and/or flutter, including paroxysmal, persistent and chronic disease
  • Valvular heart disease (which requires control in outpatient clinic of cardiology), such as aortic valve stenosis, mitral valve insufficiency, and patients with aortic dilatation
  • Hypertension treated with at least three antihypertensive drugs

Exclusion:

  • Life expectancy less than 5 years for any reason
  • Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
  • Participation in another clinical trial with an investigational product or device that could interfere with the primary and/or secondary endpoints of this study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: The Cardio-Metabolic Clinic
Comprising specialized, multidisciplinary management of diabetes and cardiovascular disease in a Cardio-Metabolic Clinic.

The Cardio-Metabolic Clinic will adhere to a standardized evaluation and treatment program based on the latest treatment guidelines from the European Cardiovascular Society. The assessment will include the following points:

  • Lipid management
  • Blood pressure management
  • Antithrombotic therapy
  • Glycemic targets
  • Prevention of diabetes-related complications
  • Treatment of vascular disease affecting the lower extremities
  • Evaluation of cardioprotective drugs
  • Counseling on lifestyle factors, including diet, smoking, alcohol, and exercise
  • Guidance on vaccinations
No Intervention: Usual Care
Involving collaboration between the general practitioner, and/or the endocrinology outpatient clinic, and/or cardiology outpatient clinic.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to first occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), a composite endpoint consisting of: cardiovascular (CV) death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, and hospitalisation for heart failure (HF).
Time Frame: From baseline to 5 years of follow-up
Measured in days.
From baseline to 5 years of follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to first occurrence of MACE, a composite endpoint consisting of: CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, and hospitalisation for HF.
Time Frame: From baseline to 10 years of follow-up
Measured in days.
From baseline to 10 years of follow-up
Time to occurrence of the individual component CV death
Time Frame: From baseline to 5 and 10 years of follow-up

Measured in days.

Including: acute myocardial infarction, venous thromboembolic event, malignant arrhythmia, cardiogenic shock, fatal stroke and aorta dissection.

From baseline to 5 and 10 years of follow-up
Time to occurrence of the individual component AMI.
Time Frame: From baseline to 5 and 10 years of follow-up

Measured in days.

Including: ST-elevation myocardium infarction and non-ST-elevation myocardium infarction

From baseline to 5 and 10 years of follow-up
Time to occurrence of the individual component non-fatal stroke.
Time Frame: From baseline to 5 and 10 years of follow-up

Measured in days.

Including: Thromboembolic or undetermined

From baseline to 5 and 10 years of follow-up
Time to first occurrence of a composite heart failure endpoint consisting of: de novo HF and HF hospitalisation.
Time Frame: From baseline to 5 and 10 years of follow-up
Measured in days.
From baseline to 5 and 10 years of follow-up
Number of overall symptom burden determined by summing the occurences of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, and hospitalisation for HF.
Time Frame: From baseline to 5 and 10 years of follow-up
Measured in count of events.
From baseline to 5 and 10 years of follow-up
Change in diabetic retinopathy stage based on eye examination (fundoscopy)
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 years of follow-up
Measured in ratio to baseline.
From baseline to 3 years of follow-up
Change in estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR)
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 years of follow-up

Measured in in ratio to baseline [mL/min/1.73 m^2]

Creatinine-based.

From baseline to 3 years of follow-up
Change in urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR)
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 years of follow-up
Measured in ratio to baseline.
From baseline to 3 years of follow-up
Change in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) stage
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 years of follow-up

Measured in ratio to baseline.

Calculated by eGFR and albuminuria.

From baseline to 3 years of follow-up
Time to first occurrence of a composite CKD endpoint consisting of a decline in eGFR [mL/min/1.73 m²] of more than 50%, onset of end-stage kidney disease (dialysis, eGFR<15, kidney transplantation) or death from renal or CV causes
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 years of follow-up
Measured in count of events.
From baseline to 3 years of follow-up
Change in fibrosis-4 (FIB-4)
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 years of follow-up

Measured in ratio to baseline.

FIB-4 is a biomarker assessing degree of liver fibrosis. Calculated using age, aspartate aminotransferase (ASAT), alanine aminotransferase (ALAT), and platelet count.

From baseline to 3 years of follow-up
Change in degree of liver fibrosis in high-risk individuals assessed through a Fibro-scan
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 years of follow-up
Measured in count of events.
From baseline to 3 years of follow-up
Time to first occurrence of a composite macrovascular diabetic complications endpoint comprising new diagnosis of lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD), new/progression of foot ulcers, surgical procedures related to PAD, and coronary revascularisation
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 years of follow-up

Measured in count of events.

Surgical procedures in relation to PAD includes: percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, peripheral artery bypass, thrombectomy, thrombolysis, amputations.

Coronary revascularisation includes: percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and/or coronary artery bypass graft.

From baseline to 3 years of follow-up
Change in ankle-brachial pressure index (ABI).
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 years of follow-up
Measured in ratio to baseline.
From baseline to 3 years of follow-up
Change in protocol-driven medication
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 years of follow-up

Measured in percentage (%).

Protocol-driven medication includes:

  • Lipid lowering medication
  • Antihypertensive medication
  • Anti-thrombotic medication
  • Anti-diabetic medication
  • Nephro-protective medication
From baseline to 3 years of follow-up
Change in symptoms as reported by patients using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
Time Frame: From baseline to 3 years of follow-up
Measured in score points (change in percentage [%])
From baseline to 3 years of follow-up
Net cost analysis of implementing a Cardio-Metabolic Clinic
Time Frame: From baseline to 5 and 10 years of follow-up

Measured in dollars [$].

Cost of Cardio-Metabolic Clinic minus averted costs ( including averted admissions, medical treatment, and productivity).

From baseline to 5 and 10 years of follow-up
Change in health outcomes measured by quality-adjusted life years (QALY)
Time Frame: From baseline to 5 and 10 years of follow-up
Measured in score points (change in percentage [%])
From baseline to 5 and 10 years of follow-up
Cost-effectiveness ratio of implementing a Cardio-Metabolic Clinic
Time Frame: From baseline to 5 and 10 years of follow-up
Measured as: Net costs/change in health outcomes [$/QALY]
From baseline to 5 and 10 years of follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Soeren Auscher, M.D, Ph.D, Cardiovascular Research Unit. Odense University Hospital, Svendborg

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2034

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 10, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 2, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 12, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

July 8, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 2, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Diseases

Clinical Trials on Cardio-Metabolic Clinic

Subscribe