The Effect of Focused Lung Ultrasonography on Antibiotic Prescribing in General Practice (PLUS-FLUS)

November 27, 2024 updated by: Julie Jepsen Strøm, Aalborg University

The Effect of Focused Lung Ultrasonography on Antibiotic Prescribing in Patients With Acute Lower Respiratory Tract Infections in Danish General Practice: A Pragmatic Randomised Controlled Trial

The goal of this randomised controlled trial is to determine if adults presenting with symptoms of an acute lower respiratory tract infection in general practice where the general practitioner suspects CAP, who have FLUS performed as an addition to usual care, have antibiotics prescribed less frequent compared to those given usual care only.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

391

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Gistrup, Denmark, 9260
        • Center for General Practice at Aalborg University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years.
  2. Acute cough (< 21 days).
  3. At least one other symptom of acute lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI).
  4. The general practitioner suspects a bacterial community-acquired pneumonia.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous antibiotic treatment for the current episode of acute LRTI.
  2. The patient is not listed with the general practitioner (no medical record available).
  3. The patient is not capable of understanding and signing informed consent.
  4. The patient does not wish to participate in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Usual Care
Participants assigned to the usual care group will receive the general practitoner's usual care of adults (≥ 18 years) presenting with symptoms of an acute lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) where the GP suspects community-acquired pneumonia. Usual care will be used as a pragmatic comparator to reflect the current standard examinations and care of this patient population in general practices in Denmark. Usual care is recommended to follow applicable guidelines from the Danish Society of General Practitioners and The Doctor's Handbook. Focused lung ultrasound (FLUS) is currently not standard or even a common examination in Danish general practices. Even for GPs already using point-of-care ultrasound on a weekly basis, FLUS is not part of usual care for adults presenting with symptoms of an acute LRTI
Participants assigned to the control group will receive the GP's usual care of adults (≥ 18 years) presenting with symptoms of an acute LRTI where the GP suspects CAP. Usual care will be used as a pragmatic comparator to reflect the current standard examinations and care of these patients in general practices in Denmark. Usual care is recommended to follow applicable guidelines from the Danish Society of General Practitioners (DSAM) and Lægehåndbogen [The Doctor's Handbook].
Experimental: Usual Care + Focused lung ultrasound (FLUS)
Participants assigned to the intervention group will receive a focused lung ultrasound examination (FLUS) during the index consultation (day 0) as an addition to usual care.
Participants assigned to the control group will receive the GP's usual care of adults (≥ 18 years) presenting with symptoms of an acute LRTI where the GP suspects CAP. Usual care will be used as a pragmatic comparator to reflect the current standard examinations and care of these patients in general practices in Denmark. Usual care is recommended to follow applicable guidelines from the Danish Society of General Practitioners (DSAM) and Lægehåndbogen [The Doctor's Handbook].
We will use a 14-zone scanning approach. Each hemithorax is divided into anterior, lateral, and posterior surfaces. The anterior and lateral surfaces on each hemithorax are divided into an upper and lower quadrant. The posterior surfaces on each hemithorax are divided into an upper, middle, and lower quadrant. Each quadrant represents a scanning zone. Each scanning zone should be assessed using FLUS. The participating general practitioners use point-of-care ultrasound on a weekly basis before trial commencement and will use the ultrasonography device already available to them.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Antibiotics prescribed at index consultation
Time Frame: Day 0
The primary outcome is the proportion of participants with antibiotics prescribed at index consultation (day 0) reported by the GP at index consultation. We will assess the effect of adding FLUS to usual care on antibiotics prescribed at index consultation by investigating if there is a difference between groups in the proportion of participants with antibiotics prescribed at index consultation..
Day 0

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Daily total LRTI symptom-score
Time Frame: From day 0 until participants have scored 0 in every symptom item, whichever comes first, or up to a maximum of day 21.
Daily total LRTI symptom-score in groups, calculated as sum of scores of six symptoms (minimum 0 - maximum 36) (mean/median). Participants will be asked to complete a validated LRTI symptom diary every day from day 0 up until day 21. The recorded items include the following six symptoms of LRTI: cough, dyspnea, sputum production, well-being, sleep disturbance, and activity disturbance. The participants will be asked to consider how bad each symptom has been, over the past 24 hours by scoring each symptom on a 7-point Likert-scale (0 = no problem, 1 = very little problem, 2 = slight problem, 3 = moderate problem, 4 = bad problem, 5 = very bad problem, and 6 = as bad as it could be).
From day 0 until participants have scored 0 in every symptom item, whichever comes first, or up to a maximum of day 21.
Days with symptoms being a "moderate problem" or worse
Time Frame: From day 0 until participants have scored 0 in every symptom item, whichever comes first, or up to a maximum of day 21.
Number of days with symptoms rated a "moderate problem" or worse by the participants in groups (at least one item with score 3 or above) (mean/median).
From day 0 until participants have scored 0 in every symptom item, whichever comes first, or up to a maximum of day 21.
Days signed in sick/cancelled work-related activities
Time Frame: From day 0 until the participant has scored 0 in every symptom item, whichever comes first, or up to a maximum of day 21.
Number of days participants signed in sick/cancelled work-related activities or cancelled leisure activities (mean/median) in groups.
From day 0 until the participant has scored 0 in every symptom item, whichever comes first, or up to a maximum of day 21.
Satisfaction with the index consultation
Time Frame: Day 0
Proportion of participants satisfied or very satisfied (4 or 5) with the index consultation on a 5-point Likert scale.
Day 0
Antibiotics prescribed as delayed antibiotic prescription
Time Frame: Day 0
Proportion of antibiotics prescribed as delayed antibiotic prescriptions at index consultation (day 0).
Day 0
Antibiotics prescribed during follow-up
Time Frame: Up until day 28
Proportion of participants with antibiotics prescribed within 7 and 28 days after index consultation.
Up until day 28
Re-consultations
Time Frame: Up until day 28.
Proportion of participants with re-consultations, defined as any primary care contacts (general practice or out-of-hour services), within 28 days after index consultation.
Up until day 28.
Admission to hospital
Time Frame: Up until day 28.
Proportion of participants admitted to hospital within 28 days after index consultation.
Up until day 28.
Complications
Time Frame: Up until day 28.
Proportion of participants with complications (pleural infection (defined as complicated parapneumonic effusion or empyema), lung abscess, or sepsis) during admission to hospital within 28 days after index consultation.
Up until day 28.
Other imaging than FLUS performed
Time Frame: Up until day 28.
Proportion of participants with other imaging than FLUS (any imaging performed in secondary health care services) performed within 28 days after index consultation.
Up until day 28.
Types of other imaging performed
Time Frame: Up until day 28.
Types of other imaging than FLUS performed within 28 days after index consultation.
Up until day 28.
Referred with suspicion of cancer
Time Frame: Up until day 60.
Proportion of participants referred with suspicion of cancer within 60 days after index consultation.
Up until day 60.
Diagnoses of cancer
Time Frame: Up until day 60.
Proportion of participants in groups diagnosed with cancer within 60 days after index consultation.
Up until day 60.
Spontaneously reported unintended events
Time Frame: Up until day 60.
Number of spontaneously reported unintended events up until 60 days after index consultation.
Up until day 60.
Mortality
Time Frame: Up until day 28 and 60.
All-cause mortality up until day 28 and day 60.
Up until day 28 and 60.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Julie J Strøm, MD, Center for General Practice at Aalborg University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 3, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

October 17, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 7, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Community Acquired Pneumonia

Clinical Trials on Usual Care

Subscribe