Music Therapy and Social Work Telehealth for Older Adult Well-Being (Melo-SWell)

August 26, 2025 updated by: Alaine E Hernandez, PhD

A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of a Collaborative Music Therapy and Social Work Telehealth Framework to Address the Well-Being of Community- Dwelling Older Adults

This study investigates the benefits of using telehealth services, specifically a combination of music therapy and social work support, to improve the well-being of older adults. Investigators are focusing on outcomes such as reduced loneliness, improved cognition, and how well older adults with and without dementia perceive the quality of the services received. This research is crucial because as the population ages and conditions like Alzheimer's become more prevalent, effective psychosocial interventions are needed.

The collaborative telehealth approach of the intervention in this study strives to connect older adults to community and health-related services. Older adults experience challenges in accessing services related to transportation, social support, and finances. While the pandemic prompted a rapid shift of healthcare services online, including music therapy and social work, questions remain about the quality of this transition, especially for older adults who may not be familiar with or have the resources for telehealth.

In this pilot study, investigators are studying music therapy and social work support through telehealth to understand how this approach can impact the well-being, cognition, and service quality for older adults, both with and without dementia. Social workers, who focus on improving well-being and addressing various needs, can leverage the therapeutic relationship built by music therapists to better identify and meet service needs. This pilot study builds on a feasibility project, which indicated that this collaborative framework is acceptable, valuable, and of interest to older adults, facilitating remote community connection. Through this research, investigators aim to evaluate the effectiveness of telehealth services for older adults to inform a future larger trial.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The goal of this quantitative pilot study is to evaluate the effectiveness of a collaborative music therapy and social work telehealth framework for community-dwelling older adults with and without dementia with regards to their emotions, well-being, cognition, and perceived service quality. This pilot study builds on a feasibility study that field tested logistics and provided proof-of-concept of the novel telehealth framework. Specifically, the feasibility study evaluated the acceptability, barriers, and facilitators of this framework for older adults with and without dementia. Both music-based interventions were grounded in the person-centered Clinical Practice Model for Persons with Dementia, which provides guidelines for adjusting the degree of support and challenge offered to an individual. The investigators developed a collaborative social work referral worksheet. The investigators conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with participants and care partners, who offered input about all aspects of the study. The investigators also refined recruitment, data collection, protocol training, and intervention processes. This pilot study builds on this past feasibility work.

Older adults often experience changes in health, finances, and social support which impede community involvement. Social distancing surrounding COVID-19 exacerbated such hurdles and enhanced risk for loneliness, depression, and cognitive decline. Although many services including music therapy and social work transitioned from in-person to telehealth during the pandemic, the rapid shift suggests that innovation occurred reactively, without sufficient time to evaluate the quality or effectiveness of this service delivery model. Telehealth is likely to continue to be a component of the music therapy profession and more broadly in healthcare. With thoughtful and systematic development to bridge the digital divide, telehealth may offer some benefit to community-dwelling older adults. This goal may be accomplished through interprofessional collaboration. Music therapists can address psychosocial needs through a variety of flexible and age-appropriate music experiences, while social workers have expertise to reach isolated individuals and connect them to appropriate supports. This pilot study advances a line of research to test a novel telehealth framework that integrates social work and music therapy to promote older adult well-being.

In this quantitative pilot study, the investigators will test methods and procedures that will be used in a future larger clinical trial to enhance the rigor and reproducibility of this research. The objectives of this pilot study are to examine the effects of the collaborative telehealth framework on older adults' well-being (primary aim), cognition, loneliness, perception of service quality, and (in response to music therapy) emotions, and to gather preliminary data for effect size estimation. Participants and interventionists will be invited to engage in a semi-structured qualitative interview at the conclusion of the study to inform further optimization of the collaborative telehealth framework. Participants have the option to use their own or borrow equipment (iPads). To reach those with limited resources, there will be 2 iPads with cellular data available to ship to enable study participation. Participants will be community-dwelling older adults with and without dementia. All participants will receive music therapy via telehealth and social work wellness sessions via telehealth. Collaboration is the key difference in the levels of independent variable: participants will be randomly assigned to either a collaborative condition, or non-collaborative condition. In the collaborative condition, information collected during music therapy will inform social work wellness sessions following a protocol developed during the feasibility study. In the non-collaborative condition, social workers and music therapists will operate telehealth services independently.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Kentucky
      • Lexington, Kentucky, United States, 40506
        • University of Kentucky
    • Missouri
      • St Louis, Missouri, United States, 63103
        • Saint Louis University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age 65 or older
  • English-speaking
  • reside in Kentucky
  • willing to receive support from the research team on how to access Zoom (as needed)
  • EITHER a) have familiarity using digital technology and/or a video conferencing app such as Zoom, FaceTime, or Facebook Messenger, OR b) have a family member or friend who can facilitate Zoom access (i.e., "helper").

Exclusion Criteria:

  • substance use disorder, which could present a confounding variable relative to the aims;
  • significant sensory impairment that interferes with Zoom use
  • current music therapy and/or social work case manager recipient

HELPERS: facilitate participation by older adults who are unfamiliar with using video conferencing technology and/or who lack consent capacity.

Helper Inclusion Criteria:

  • at least 18 years old
  • cognitively unimpaired
  • live with or be able to go to the older adult's residence to assist them in participating in the study.

Helper Exclusion Criteria:

  • under 18 years old
  • cognitively impaired
  • unable to assist the older adult in participating in the study for any reason

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Collaborative

Social workers and music therapists work together, and information collected during music therapy informs social work wellness sessions following a protocol developed during the feasibility study.

There are 3 blocks of activities, identical to the non-collaborative arm:

  • Weeks 1-2: enrollment, stratification, random assignment
  • Weeks 3-6: music therapy and social work interventions
  • Weeks 7-8: social work follow up.
Music Therapy: delivered via Zoom by a board-certified music therapist (MT-BC) 30-min 2x/week for 4 weeks (8 sessions total); follows the Clinical Practice Model, which guides customizations of various music experiences (e.g., singing, songwriting, movement, relaxation, lyric discussion, improvisation, instrument play, etc.) per participants' strengths, interests, preferences, culture, and momentary responses. Each participant works with the same MT-BC throughout the study.
Other Names:
  • Music-based intervention (MBI)
Social Work: delivered via Zoom by a licensed SW or supervised SW graduate student 3x for 30-min: 1) after 2 weeks MT (assessment), 2) after 4 weeks MT (service referral), 3) 2-week follow-up. In addition to the AMQoL, baseline data, SW session interactions, and the SW Referral Worksheet, SWs collaborate fully with MT-BCs, have full access MT session notes, and can discuss participants' needs with MT-BC to identify possible participant service referral needs. Each participant works with the same SW throughout the study.
Other Names:
  • Integrative social work intervention, integrative wellness support
Sham Comparator: Non-Collaborative

Social workers and music therapists operate independently.

There are 3 blocks of activities, identical to the collaborative arm:

  • Weeks 1-2: enrollment, stratification, random assignment
  • Weeks 3-6: music therapy and social work interventions
  • Weeks 7-8: social work follow up.
Music Therapy: delivered via Zoom by a board-certified music therapist (MT-BC) 30-min 2x/week for 4 weeks (8 sessions total); follows the Clinical Practice Model, which guides customizations of various music experiences (e.g., singing, songwriting, movement, relaxation, lyric discussion, improvisation, instrument play, etc.) per participants' strengths, interests, preferences, culture, and momentary responses. Each participant works with the same MT-BC throughout the study.
Other Names:
  • Music-based intervention (MBI)
Social Work: delivered via Zoom by a licensed social worker (SW) or supervised SW graduate student 3x for 30-min: 1) after 2 weeks MT (assessment), 2) after 4 weeks MT (service referral), 3) 2-week follow-up. SWs operate independently from MT-BCs to identify possible participant service referral needs using the Aging and Memory Quality of Life Survey (AMQoL), baseline data, SW session interactions, and SW Referral Worksheet. Each participant works with the same SW throughout the study.
Other Names:
  • Independent social work intervention, independent wellness support

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change from Baseline in World Health Organization-5 (WHO-5) Well-Being Index at 6 Weeks
Time Frame: Enrollment, end of Week 6.
A simple 5-item measure of subjective well-being (a combination of feeling good and functioning well). The participant rates each item on a 6-point scale from 0 (at no time) to 5 (all of the time); total raw score ranges from 0 (worst possible) to 25 (best possible well-being); percentage score (raw X 4) ranges from 0 (worst possible) to 100 (best possible well-being). Administered by outcome assessor by phone or Zoom at participant's preference.
Enrollment, end of Week 6.
Mean Change from Baseline in WHO-5 Well-Being Index at 8 Weeks
Time Frame: Enrollment, end of Week 8.
A simple 5-item measure of subjective well-being (a combination of feeling good and functioning well). The participant rates each item on a 6-point scale from 0 (at no time) to 5 (all of the time); total raw score ranges from 0 (worst possible) to 25 (best possible well-being); percentage score (raw X 4) ranges from 0 (worst possible) to 100 (best possible well-being). Administered by outcome assessor by phone or Zoom at participant's preference.
Enrollment, end of Week 8.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mean Change in Self-Reported Feelings for Participants with Dementia
Time Frame: Immediately before and immediately after each music therapy session.
Administered by music therapists. For participants who score less than 18 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): The Dementia Mood Picture Test (DMPT) measures self-reported feelings of persons with mild, moderate, or severe dementia using simple, enlarged face drawings with verbal descriptors for 6 emotions: good mood, bad mood, happy, sad, angry, and worried. The person with dementia rates each emotion on a 3-point scale from 0 (do not feel that emotion) to 2 (feel that emotion a lot); total score ranges from 0 (most negative) to 12 (most positive; with negative valence emotions reverse-scored).
Immediately before and immediately after each music therapy session.
Mean Change from Baseline in University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale at 6 Weeks
Time Frame: Enrollment, end of Week 6.
The UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3) is a 20-item scale designed to measure subjective feelings of loneliness and social isolation. Participants rate each item on a 4-point scale from 1 (Never) to 4 (Often). Total score ranges from 20 (lower loneliness) to 80 (higher loneliness). Administered by outcome assessor by phone or Zoom at participant's preference.
Enrollment, end of Week 6.
Mean Change from Baseline in UCLA Loneliness Scale at 8 Weeks
Time Frame: Enrollment, end of Week 8.
The UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3) is a 20-item scale designed to measure subjective feelings of loneliness and social isolation. Participants rate each item on a 4-point scale from 1 (Never) to 4 (Often). Total score ranges from 20 (lower loneliness) to 80 (higher loneliness). Administered by outcome assessor by phone or Zoom at participant's preference.
Enrollment, end of Week 8.
Mean Change from Baseline in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) at 6 Weeks
Time Frame: Enrollment, end of Week 6.
Cognitive screening tool with scores ranging from 0 (greatly impaired) to 30 (unimpaired). The researchers will use the Audio-Visual Conference version as a brief estimate of change in cognitive status over the course of the study. Those who score less than 18 will be labeled as "with dementia" for the purposes of random assignment, and the researchers will use the following descriptive severity categories: > 25 = no impairment, 18-25 = mild impairment, 10-17= moderate impairment, < 10 = severe impairment. Administered by outcome assessor by Zoom.
Enrollment, end of Week 6.
Program Evaluation Total Score
Time Frame: Within 1 week of final social work session.
The researchers will use a 12-item Quality Questionnaire concerning quality, willingness to try, and helpfulness of music therapy, social work, telehealth, and the overall program. Each item uses a 5-point Likert-type scale from 1 (Poor/extremely unwilling/extremely unhelpful) to 5 (Excellent/extremely willing/extremely helpful). Total score ranges from 12 (worst) to 60 (best). Administered by outcome assessor by phone or Zoom at participant's preference.
Within 1 week of final social work session.
Program Evaluation Quality Score
Time Frame: Within 1 week of final social work session.
The researchers will analyze 4 quality items from the Quality Questionnaire concerning quality of music therapy, quality of social work, quality of telehealth, and quality of the overall program. Each item uses a 5-point Likert-type scale from 1 (Poor) to 5 (Excellent). Total score for quality ranges from 4 (poorest quality) to 20 (best quality). Administered by outcome assessor by phone or Zoom at participant's preference.
Within 1 week of final social work session.
Program Evaluation Willingness Score
Time Frame: Within 1 week of final social work session.
The researchers will analyze 4 quality items from the Quality Questionnaire concerning willingness to try music therapy, social work, telehealth, and the overall program in the future. Each item uses a 5-point Likert-type scale from 1 (extremely unwilling) to 5 (extremely willing). Total score for willingness ranges from 4 (most unwilling) to 20 (most willing). Administered by outcome assessor by phone or Zoom at participant's preference.
Within 1 week of final social work session.
Program Evaluation Helpfulness Score
Time Frame: Within 1 week of final social work session.
The researchers will analyze 4 quality items from the Quality Questionnaire concerning helpfulness of music therapy, social work, telehealth, and the overall program. Each item uses a 5-point Likert-type scale from 1 (extremely unhelpful) to 5 (extremely helpful). Total score for helpfulness ranges from 4 (most unhelpful) to 20 (most helpful). Administered by outcome assessor by phone or Zoom at participant's preference.
Within 1 week of final social work session.
Mean Change in Self-Reported Feelings for Participants without Dementia
Time Frame: Immediately before and immediately after each music therapy session.
Administered by music therapists. For participants who score 18 or greater on the MoCA: analogous Likert-type scale for the same 6 DMPT items: good mood, bad mood, happy, sad, angry, and worried, scored from 0 (do not feel that emotion) to 6 (feel that emotion a lot); total score ranges from 0 (most negative) to 36 (most positive).
Immediately before and immediately after each music therapy session.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alaine E Reschke-Hernandez, PhD, University of Kentucky
  • Principal Investigator: Allison Gibson, PhD, St. Louis University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 19, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 14, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

July 25, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 12, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 23, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

September 3, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 63233
  • Arthur Flagler Fultz Award (Other Identifier: American Music Therapy Association)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

This is a small pilot study. Pilot data for preliminary effect size estimating will not be publicly shared. Researchers may request de-identified data and study materials from the principal investigator.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

6 months after publication. The principal investigator will consider sharing data and study materials prior to that time frame in consultation with the study team.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The principal investigator will share data, qualitative and quantitative analysis plans, and study materials with other researchers who provide a reasonable rationale for intended use, by email. Requests will be reviewed by the principal investigator Reschke-Hernandez and co-investigator Gibson.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dementia

Clinical Trials on Music Therapy Telehealth

Subscribe