MEXIDOL® in the Rehabilitation Treatment of Patients With Acute Cerebral Failure

April 10, 2025 updated by: Pharmasoft

Prospective Randomized Study of the Modulating Effect of MEXIDOL® as an Adjuvant Stimulant of the Cognitive-emotional Component of the Rehabilitation Treatment in Patients With Acute Cerebral Failure

The use of metabolic modulators creates prospects for increasing the efficiency of the rehabilitation treatment of patients with acute cerebral failure

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Modern neurorehabilitation is a set of basic and adjuvant treatment methods that provide a modulating effect on the neurorestoration process. The range of basic rehabilitation practices includes kinesiotherapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy, and neuropsychology. Adjuvant methods include physiotherapeutic and medicinal methods. For this study, the investigators chose MEXIDOL® as an adjuvant metabolic medicine, which has the ability to modulate receptor complexes of brain membranes, in particular benzodiazepine, GABA, acetylcholine, enhancing their ability to bind to specific ligands. This pharmacodynamic feature of the drug can have a positive effect on the psycho-emotional state of patients, which in turn will increase motivation and, consequently, the success of the rehabilitation process

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Sverdlovsk Region
      • Ekaterinburg, Sverdlovsk Region, Russian Federation, 623702
        • Brain Institute Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke
  • Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) test >15; ≤22

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Under 18 years old
  • Epilepsy
  • Pregnancy
  • Acute failure of one or more organ systems
  • Purulent-inflammatory disease of any localization
  • Participating in any other clinical trial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Main (Mexidol and standard treatment)
Mexidol IV 500 mg for 10 days, then Mexidol FORTE 250 orally 250 mg 1 tablet 3 times a day for 8 weeks; and standard treatment
Neurocytoprotector
Other Names:
  • Ethylmethylhydroxypyridine Succinate
No Intervention: Control
Standard treatment: basic practices of kinesitherapy, occupational therapy, speech therapy, clinical psychology, supplemented by adjuvant procedures of electrotherapy and rehabilitation environment therapy. The patient's rehabilitation load was at least 3 hours a day for 12 days

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Аssessment of Attentiveness and Performance
Time Frame: Assessed before starting therapy (Day 1), at the end of the parenteral therapy phase (Day 10) and at the end of the course of therapy (Day 66).
Schulte test [work efficiency]. Test methodology: the subject is successively shown 5 tables (5x5), in the cells of which numbers (from 1 to 25) are randomly located. It is required to show and name all the numbers in ascending order (from 1 to 25). The time spent on each table separately is recorded. Depending on the objectives, the excess of the standard (40-50 sec) time spent on each table and the dynamics of time indicators, or the average or total result of the examination for all five tables, are analyzed [test time: min value 30.0 sec, max value N/A; higher scores mean a worse outcome].
Assessed before starting therapy (Day 1), at the end of the parenteral therapy phase (Day 10) and at the end of the course of therapy (Day 66).
Dynamics of Cognitive Status
Time Frame: Assessed at screening (Day 0), at the end of the parenteral therapy phase (Day 10) and at the end of the course of therapy (Day 66); Day 66 reported
The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA test) [31 point scale: min value 0, max value 30, higher scores mean a better outcome]
Assessed at screening (Day 0), at the end of the parenteral therapy phase (Day 10) and at the end of the course of therapy (Day 66); Day 66 reported
Severity of Depression
Time Frame: Assessed before starting therapy (Day 1), at the end of the parenteral therapy phase (Day 10), in the middle of the oral therapy phase (Day 38) and at the end of the course of therapy (Day 66); Day 66 reported
The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI scale) [64 point scale: min value 0, max value 63, higher scores mean a worse outcome]
Assessed before starting therapy (Day 1), at the end of the parenteral therapy phase (Day 10), in the middle of the oral therapy phase (Day 38) and at the end of the course of therapy (Day 66); Day 66 reported
Reduction in Anxiety
Time Frame: Assessed before starting therapy (Day 1), at the end of the parenteral therapy phase (Day 10), in the middle of the oral therapy phase (Day 38) and at the end of the course of therapy (Day 66); Day 66 reported
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) [22 point scale: min value 0, max value 21, higher scores mean a worse outcome]
Assessed before starting therapy (Day 1), at the end of the parenteral therapy phase (Day 10), in the middle of the oral therapy phase (Day 38) and at the end of the course of therapy (Day 66); Day 66 reported
Severity of Post Intensive Care Syndrome
Time Frame: Assessed before starting therapy (Day 1), at the end of the parenteral therapy phase (Day 10), in the middle of the oral therapy phase (Day 38) and at the end of the course of therapy (Day 66); Day 66 reported
The Post Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS) score [21 point scale: min value 0, max value 10 with 0,5 point scale division, higher scores mean a worse outcome]
Assessed before starting therapy (Day 1), at the end of the parenteral therapy phase (Day 10), in the middle of the oral therapy phase (Day 38) and at the end of the course of therapy (Day 66); Day 66 reported
Dynamics of Level of Mobility
Time Frame: Assessed before starting therapy (Day 1), at the end of the parenteral therapy phase (Day 10), in the middle of the oral therapy phase (Day 38) and at the end of the course of therapy (Day 66); Day 66 reported
The Rivermead index [16 point scale: min value 0, max value 15, higher scores mean a better outcome]
Assessed before starting therapy (Day 1), at the end of the parenteral therapy phase (Day 10), in the middle of the oral therapy phase (Day 38) and at the end of the course of therapy (Day 66); Day 66 reported
Dynamics of the Level of Life
Time Frame: Assessed at screening (Day 0), at the end of the parenteral therapy phase (Day 10), in the middle of the oral therapy phase (Day 38) and at the end of the course of therapy (Day 66); Day 66 reported
The Rehabilitation Routing Scale (RRS) [7 point scale: min value 0, max value 6, higher scores mean a worse outcome]
Assessed at screening (Day 0), at the end of the parenteral therapy phase (Day 10), in the middle of the oral therapy phase (Day 38) and at the end of the course of therapy (Day 66); Day 66 reported
Severity and Dynamics of Muscle Strength
Time Frame: Assessed before starting therapy (Day 1), at the end of the parenteral therapy phase (Day 10), in the middle of the oral therapy phase (Day 38) and at the end of the course of therapy (Day 66); Day 66 reported
The Muscle Strength Quantitative Rating (MRC) Scale [6 point scale: min value 0, max value 5, higher scores mean a better outcome]
Assessed before starting therapy (Day 1), at the end of the parenteral therapy phase (Day 10), in the middle of the oral therapy phase (Day 38) and at the end of the course of therapy (Day 66); Day 66 reported
Systolic Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity (Vs) Using Transcranial Doppler (TCD) at Key Time Points
Time Frame: The TCDG parameters registrated before infusion, at the start of the infusion, at the start of the Schulte test, at the end of the Schulte test, at the end of the infusion.
Systolic cerebral blood flow velocity (Vs) was measured in сm/sec using transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD). Measurements were taken for each participant at five key time points: (1) before the first Mexidol infusion ("Before infusion"), (2) at the start of the infusion, (3) at the start of the Schulte test, (4) at the end of the Schulte test, and (5) at the end of the infusion. [Normal values: min 35 сm/sec, max 95 сm/sec]
The TCDG parameters registrated before infusion, at the start of the infusion, at the start of the Schulte test, at the end of the Schulte test, at the end of the infusion.
Overshoot Coefficient (OC) of Systolic Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity (TCD) at Key Time Points
Time Frame: The TCDG parameters registrated before infusion, at the start of the infusion, at the start of the Schulte test, at the end of the Schulte test, at the end of the infusion.
The Overshoot Coefficient (OC) is a ratio reflecting the change in systolic cerebral blood flow velocity before and after specific stimuli. It was calculated based on transcranial Doppler measurements at five key time points: (1) before the first Mexidol infusion ("Before infusion"), (2) at the start of the infusion, (3) at the start of the Schulte test, (4) at the end of the Schulte test, and (5) at the end of the infusion. [It's calculated by the formula OC=(Vo-Vs)/Vs, the norm is not less than 1.12]
The TCDG parameters registrated before infusion, at the start of the infusion, at the start of the Schulte test, at the end of the Schulte test, at the end of the infusion.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]
Time Frame: Throughout the study [From Day 1 up to Day 66]
Registration of adverse events related to Mexidol and significant differences in vital signs between groups
Throughout the study [From Day 1 up to Day 66]

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 17, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 12, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

September 12, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 15, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

January 24, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 27, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ischemic Stroke, Acute

Clinical Trials on Mexidol

Subscribe