The Ultrasound-guided vs Bronchoscopy-guided vs Ultrasound-bronchoscopy-guided Percutaneous Tracheostomy Trial (BRONCUS-PDT)

January 17, 2024 updated by: Constantinescu Catalin, Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie Iuliu Hatieganu

The Ultrasound-guided Versus Bronchoscopy-guided vs Ultrasound-bronchoscopy-guided Percutaneous Dilational Tracheostomy Trial - Standardization or Customization?

This trial (BRONCUS) is a randomized one designed to evaluate the overall safety of ultrasound guided compared to bronchoscopy guided compared to ultrasound-bronchoscopy guided percutaneous tracheostomy, in order to find out if universal standardization is required or customized approach can be sufficient.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Enrolled patients will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to ultrasound or bronchoscopy or ultrasound-bronchoscopy arms, and then the procedure related complications and clinical outcomes will be evaluated and compared between the groups. The procedures will be performed according to standardized practices following hospital guidelines.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Cluj
      • Cluj-Napoca, Cluj, Romania, 400006

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult patients (over 18 years old), intubated, mechanically ventilated, and with an indication for a tracheostomy

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients with contraindications for PDT:

  • short neck
  • tracheal deviation
  • difficult anatomy
  • previous neck surgery
  • cervical trauma or inability to perform neck extension
  • preference for surgical tracheostomy by the patient assistant team
  • patients unable to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Ultrasound guided percutaneous tracheostomy
The PDT will be performed by the attending physician exclusively with the aid of the ultrasound.
Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy
Active Comparator: Bronchoscopy guided percutaneous tracheostomy
The PDT will be performed by the attending physician exclusively with the aid of the bronchoscope.
Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy
Active Comparator: Ultrasound-bronchoscopy guided percutaneous tracheostomy
The PDT will be performed by the attending physician with the aid of the ultrasound and bronchoscope.
Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PDT feasibility/failure
Time Frame: During PDT - 15-25 minutes
Conversion to a surgical tracheostomy in any case, associated use of bronchoscopy in the case of ultrasound-guided PDT, associated use of ultrasound in the case of bronchoscopy-guided PDT, or the occurrence of a major complication.
During PDT - 15-25 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Minor complication - hypotension
Time Frame: During PDT (an expected average of 15-30 minutes)
a drop of MAP<65 mmHg for less than 5 minutes without the requirement of fluids or vasopressors
During PDT (an expected average of 15-30 minutes)
Procedure difficulty
Time Frame: During PDT (an expected average of 15-30 minutes)
(1) easy, (2) somewhat difficult, (3) difficult, (4) very difficult, or (5) impossible
During PDT (an expected average of 15-30 minutes)
ICU mortality
Time Frame: During hospital LOS (an expected average of 4 weeks )
We will measure ICU mortality at the discharge and 60 days after discharge.
During hospital LOS (an expected average of 4 weeks )
Hospital mortality
Time Frame: During hospital LOS (an expected average of 4 weeks)
We will measure hospital mortality at the discharge and 60 days after discharge.
During hospital LOS (an expected average of 4 weeks)
Procedure duration
Time Frame: During PDT (an expected average of 15-30 minutes)
We will measure the procedure duration from the point beginning of the procedure and the end of it.
During PDT (an expected average of 15-30 minutes)
Mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: During hospital LOS (an expected average of 4 weeks)
Days of MV before and after PDT
During hospital LOS (an expected average of 4 weeks)
Minor complication - hypoxemia
Time Frame: During PDT (an expected average of 15-30 minutes)
A drop in peripheral oxygen saturation < 90% for more than 2 minutes as measured by pulse oxymeter during the procedure while the patient is of 100% FiO2
During PDT (an expected average of 15-30 minutes)
Minor complication - Accidental decannulation
Time Frame: During hospital LOS (an expected average of 4 weeks)
Accidental decannulation
During hospital LOS (an expected average of 4 weeks)
Minor complication - Tracheostomy stoma infection
Time Frame: During hospital LOS (an expected average of 4 weeks)
Tracheostomy stoma infection
During hospital LOS (an expected average of 4 weeks)
Minor complication - Localized minor bleeding
Time Frame: During PDT (an expected average of 15-30 minutes)
Localized minor bleeding
During PDT (an expected average of 15-30 minutes)
Minor complication - Localized subcutaneous emphysema
Time Frame: During PDT (an expected average of 15-30 minutes)
Localized subcutaneous emphysema
During PDT (an expected average of 15-30 minutes)
Lenght of ICU stay
Time Frame: (an expected average of 4 weeks)
Lenght of ICU stay
(an expected average of 4 weeks)
Lenght of hospital stay
Time Frame: (an expected average of 4 weeks)
Lenght of hospital stay
(an expected average of 4 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Cristina Petrisor, Prof, Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie Iuliu Hatieganu

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 17, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 6, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 5, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

January 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UMF-USBR-2024-001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tracheostomy Complication

Clinical Trials on Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy

Subscribe