TheraPAP Equivalence Crossover Study

November 21, 2024 updated by: SleepRes Inc.

Randomized Crossover Study to Compare Effectiveness of a Device Providing Pressure Drops During Inspiration (TPAP) to Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) in Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)

The present study, TheraEquivalence, is a Phase 2 crossover study designed to examine the efficacy and safety of TheraPAP (TPAP) vs. CPAP alone in the treatment of OSA.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The TheraEquivalence Study is a randomized, controlled, crossover study in participants with OSA. A split-night polysomnogram (PSG) will be conducted on CPAP and TPAP (3.5 h each treatment arm) in previously diagnosed OSA patients, to test the effectiveness of TPAP vs. CPAP. The sequence of periods for each participant are assigned in random order. Therapeutic CPAP level will be defined based on each individual's pressure levels from their currently used APAP device deemed to eliminate breathing obstructions for at least 90/95% of the sleep period (P90/P95) + 1 cmH2O (cm of water pressure). P90/P95 will be defined based on the previous 2 months of adherent Auto-adjusted Positive Airway Pressure (APAP) usage (defined as averaging > 5 hrs/night). On TPAP Tthe pressure drop during inspiration is generally done in two steps and varies, as outlined in table 1, based on the set pressure level, with larger drops occurring when the set pressure is higher. However, the pressure never goes below 5 cm H20. This lower pressure is returned to the set pressure level about halfway through expiration. These pressure drops are designed to make TPAP considerably more comfortable than CPAP.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tennessee
      • Clarksville, Tennessee, United States, 37043
        • SleepCenters of Middle Tennessee

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. AHI > 10 on a previous PSG.
  2. CPAP adherence for an average of 5 h/night in the 2 months before the study
  3. BMI above 18 kg/m2, inclusive.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Current clinically significant sleep disorder other than OSA of a severity that would interfere with study participation or interpretability of data (including central sleep apnea, per central AHI > 5 events/h).
  2. Current clinically unstable cardiac disease (e.g., rhythm disturbances, coronary artery disease or cardiac failure) or poorly controlled hypertension (>140/90mmHg).
  3. Current clinically significant neurological disorder, including epilepsy/convulsions.
  4. Other serious major organ system disease including renal failure, lung disease, neuromuscular disease, or liver disease.
  5. Schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or bipolar disorder according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 (DSM 5) or International Classification of Disease tenth edition criteria.
  6. Attempted suicide within 1 year prior to screening, or current suicidal ideation.
  7. History of substance use disorder as defined in DSM-V within 24 months prior to Screening Visit.
  8. A serious illness or infection in the past 30 days as determined by investigator.
  9. Clinically significant cognitive dysfunction as determined by investigator.
  10. Chronic oxygen therapy.
  11. Patients with hypoglossal nerve stimulation implant.
  12. Any non-previously mentioned vulnerable population.
  13. Any condition that in the investigator's opinion would present an unreasonable risk to the participant, or which would interfere with their participation in the study or confound study interpretation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: TPAP - Experimental Therapy
Experimental therapy in which pressure is reduced during inspiration and the reduction is carried through part of expiration such that the pressure is increased near the end of expiration.
Algorithm for modification of CPAP therapy where pressure is reduced during the inspiratory phase though much of the expiratory phase, then is returned to full pressure near the end of the expiratory phase. Note that the same device that delivers CPAP can also deliver TPAP
Other Names:
  • TheraPAP
Active Comparator: CPAP - Traditional OSA Therapy
Standard OSA therapy to which the TPAP therapy will be compared for efficacy.
Gold standard for treating sleep apnea.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Apnea/Hypopnea Index
Time Frame: During overnight procedure, on average 3.5 hours for each intervention
Gold standard measure of CPAP therapy efficacy. Scored as number of respiratory events per hour of sleep. The device is considered efficacious with an apnea-hypopnea index < 5 events/h.
During overnight procedure, on average 3.5 hours for each intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Unintentional Patient Circuit Leak
Time Frame: During overnight procedure
Evaluation of unintentional circuit leak by measuring flow offset from CPAP and knowing the intentional mask leak
During overnight procedure
REM Apnea/Hypopnea Index (AHI)
Time Frame: During rapid eye movements (REM) sleep during the overnight procedure, assessed over 3.5 hours for each intervention
Scored as number of respiratory events per hour of sleep spent in rapid eye movement stage. The device is generally considered efficacious with an apnea-hypopnea index in REM < 5 events/h, however it has to be noted that obstructive sleep apnea during REM sleep is more difficult to treat.
During rapid eye movements (REM) sleep during the overnight procedure, assessed over 3.5 hours for each intervention
Supine AHI
Time Frame: During sleep spent in supine position during the overnight procedure, assessed over 3.5 hours for each intervention
Assessment of AHI (apnea hypopnea index) during supine sleep. The device is generally considered efficacious if supine AHI is below 5 events/h, however it has to be noted that obstructive sleep apnea in supine position is more difficult to treat.
During sleep spent in supine position during the overnight procedure, assessed over 3.5 hours for each intervention
NREM Apnea/Hypopnea Index (AHI)
Time Frame: During non-rapid eye movements (NREM) sleep during the overnight procedure, assessed over 3.5 hours for each intervention
Scored as number of respiratory events per hour of sleep spent in non-rapid eye movement stage (NREM). The device is generally considered efficacious with an apnea-hypopnea index in NREM < 5 events/h.
During non-rapid eye movements (NREM) sleep during the overnight procedure, assessed over 3.5 hours for each intervention
Lateral AHI
Time Frame: During sleep spent in lateral position during the overnight procedure, assessed over 3.5 hours for each intervention
Assessment of AHI (apnea hypopnea index) during lateral sleep. The device is generally considered efficacious if lateral AHI is below 5 events/h
During sleep spent in lateral position during the overnight procedure, assessed over 3.5 hours for each intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Abinash Joshi, MD, SleepRes Inc.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 7, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 8, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

July 8, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 2, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Clinical Trials on TPAP

Subscribe