Effectiveness of Arthrocentesis and the Occlusal Splint in Treatment of the TMJ

February 4, 2024 updated by: Gustavo Grothe Machado, University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

Effectiveness of Arthrocentesis and the Occlusal Splint in Treatment of Disc Displacements of the Temporomandibular Joint

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare occlusal splint and arthrocentesis in patients with disc displacement with/without reduction. The main question it aims to answer are:

• Is there a more effective treatment for this cases?

Participants will answer a questionary about pain and functional limitations.

Researchers will compare Group 1(occlusal plate) and Gruoup 2 (arthrocentesis) to see if there is pain reduction and functional improvement in patients with disc displacement with/without reduction

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Introduction: Temporomandibular joint disc displacement is a disorder in which the articular disc is anteriorly displaced from its correct position in relation to the mandibular condyle and mandibular fossa. Traditionally, the initial treatment of disc displacements involves several conservative measures, among them, the stabilizing interocclusal splint. However, in cases where there is associated opening limitation, such as intermittent lock and closed-lock, arthrocentesis has been suggested as another initial treatment modality due to its faster effect in preventing disease progression to a more advanced stage, in addition to reducing the chances of pain chronicity and central sensitization. Objectives: The present study aimed to compare and analyze the effectiveness and benefits of performing arthrocentesis as the initial treatment in patients with DDWR with intermittent lock and in patients with DDWoR, compared to the stabilizing interocclusal splint. Additionally, it had as secondary objectives to characterize the sample according to demographic, systemic, local and psychosocial factors in both groups and to correlate the clinical characteristics of the included patients with the imaging findings of the MRI scans. Methods: A randomized, prospective, longitudinal pilot study was performed. The sample was obtained by convenience from a demand through consultations and referral, among patients treated at the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Service of HCFMUSP, from June 2021 to July 2023. Patients with diagnoses of: DDWR intermittent lock and DDWoR with opening mouth limitation. Study patients underwent an initial assessment using a clinical questionnaire (DC/TMD) and underwent an initial TMJ MRI. Then, they were randomly divided into two groups according to the treatment to which they would be submitted: stabilizing inter-occlusal splint (group 1) or arthrocentesis (group 2). After treatment was instituted, patients were evaluated at 1, 2, 3 and 6 months regarding clinical parameters of pain, functionality and psychosocial status.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • São Paulo, Brazil, 05.403-905
        • University of São Paulo Faculty of Medicine Clinics Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients at least 18 years old;
  • Diagnosed with disc displacement with reduction with intermittent block or disc displacement without reduction;
  • Availability of clinical follow-up for 6 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant patients;
  • Patients undergoing conservative or invasive interventions to treat TMD in the last 6 months;
  • Inability to use a stabilizing occlusal splint;
  • Presence of toothache, neoplasms or medical contraindication for study participation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Arthrocentesis
Delimitation of a corner-tragus line to mark points A (10mm in front of the tragus and 2mm below the CT line) and B (20mm in front of the tragus and 10mm below the CT line); Local intra- and extra-oral antisepsis with aqueous chlorhexidine 0.12% and 0.2%, respectively; Local anesthesia of the auriculotemporal and intra-capsular nerve with mepivacaine 2% + Epinephrine 1:100,000; Insertion of the first 30x0.8 mm needle at point A and injection of 2-3 mL of Lactated Ringer; Insert the second 30x0.8 mm needle into point B Wash with 100-200mL of Ringer Lactate; Removal of the second needle; Injection of 1mL of 20mg Triamcinolone diluted in 0.9% saline solution (1:1) through the needle at point A.
The patient then underwent arthrocentesis of the temporomandibular joint itself, following the Nitzan technique.
Active Comparator: Occlusal splint
A stabilizing maxillary acrylic occlusal splint was made, flat, total and adjusted in central relation (RC).
a stabilizing maxillary acrylic occlusal splint was made, flat, total and adjusted in central relation (RC).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Jaw function available in mouth opening and moviments of jaw
Time Frame: 6 months
millimeter scale
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain available through of Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: 6 months
the score is determined by measuring the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the "no pain" anchor and the patient's mark, providing a range of scores from 0-10. It's been 0 (without pain) and 10 (worst pain)
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 30, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

January 15, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 23, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

February 13, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Temporomandibular Joint Disc Displacement

Clinical Trials on Arthrocentesis

Subscribe