Effect of Social Isolation on the Role of Pavlovian Mechanisms for Control Over Alcohol Use (ReCoDe)

August 27, 2024 updated by: Andreas Heinz, Charite University, Berlin, Germany

SFB TRR 265: Losing and Regaining Control Over Drug Intake B03: Role of Pavlovian Mechanisms for Control Over Substance Use WP2: Effects of Social Isolation on PIT in AUD

During the first funding period (1st FP) we investigated the impact of acute and chronic stress (Trier Social Stress Test, TSST) on Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT). Moreover, we developed a novel full transfer task that allows assessing both general and specific PIT to investigate whether specific PIT differs between alcohol use disorder (AUD) and control subjects. We found that our online version of TSST induced stress and thereby amplified PIT effects in participants. Preliminary analyses of the full transfer task indicate that AUD participants exhibit a stronger specific PIT effect compared to controls. Based on these findings, we want to assess the following aim for this study:

Investigate the effect of experimentally induced social exclusion on alcohol-specific and general PIT effects in AUD and control participants.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The projects research aim:

The investigators will examine how an experimentally induced social exclusion by the Cyberball task is associated with alcohol specific and general PIT effects by using the newly developed full transfer task from 1st funding period in AUD vs. HCs.

The investigators will use the newly developed full PIT paradigm to examine the modifying effect of experimentally induced social exclusion stress on alcohol-specific and general PIT effects. While using the Trier Social Stress Test in the 1st FP, the investigators now want to go one step further by including social exclusion/ostracism to the stress component, which has not been studied in association with PIT effects yet. The investigators here want to shed light on possible underlying mechanisms which can lead to a promotion of alcohol-seeking by alcohol-stimuli in situations of social exclusion.

Participants (50 AUD and 50 HC) will be assessed at two time points, once after experimentally induced social exclusion and once after social inclusion in a fully balanced, cross-over within-subject design. Subjects will play an online game tossing a ball to each other with two more virtual co-players (Cyberball). Using a cover story, we make subjects believe that the co-players really exist and that they play a live online game. During social exclusion, subjects will be systematically excluded by one co-player (partial exclusion), and during social inclusion, ball tosses will be balanced between all three players. Cyberball usually induces feelings of social isolation and altered behavioral reactions in the subject, which the investigators want to assess by analyzing ball tossing behavior over time, as well as physiological and subjective measures (concentration of cortisol in saliva, heart rate variability and emotions questionnaires, such as the Need to Belong Scale, Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire, Need threat scale and Positive and Negative Affect Schedule pre and post Cyberball game and after PIT). After the Cyberball experiment, subjects will undergo the transfer part of the full PIT task (using a parallel version at one of the two days in a randomized order).

Hypothesis 1a:

Social exclusion will lead to a stronger stress hormone response (concentration of cortisol in saliva), lower heart rate variability and a stronger general PIT effect compared to social inclusion (main effect social exclusion intervention on PIT).

Hypothesis 1b:

Stronger social exclusion effects in AUD subjects compared to controls will lead to stronger PIT effects compared to social inclusion (interaction effect between group and stress intervention on PIT), especially for alcohol-specific PIT.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Males and females between 18-65 years of age,
  • AUD subjects: meet 4 or more criteria for DSM-5 alcohol-use disorder (not requiring withdrawal as assessed by an independent psychiatrist),
  • Currently using alcohol without a desire for abstinence,
  • Ability to consent to the study and complete the questionnaires.
  • Sufficient language skills: German
  • Availability between 3pm-6pm on 2 consecutive days,
  • existing health insurance

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lifetime diagnosis according to DMS-5 for a: Bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, schizophrenia spectrum disorder, substance dependence except for alcohol, nicotine, cannabis, and/or methamphetamine
  • Currently meeting DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for depressive episode, suicidal ideation,
  • History of traumatic brain injury or severe neurological disease (such as dementia, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis)
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding,
  • Ingestion of medications known to interact with the CNS in the 10-day period prior to study participation or less than 4 half-lives after last ingestion (rapid urine test),
  • Color vision deficiency

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Control (HC) - exclusion first
Healthy participants without SUD Cyberball: Exclusion Day 1; Cyberball: Inclusion Day 2

The paradigm consists of four parts:

In the first part, an instrumental learning task is completed in which subjects must learn which stimuli require a response and which do not. In the second part, a classical (Pavlovian) conditioning task is then completed in which subjects learn by passive viewing which stimuli are associated with certain amounts of money. The third part measures to which instrumental responses (learned in Part 1) are modulated by the presentation of the classically conditioned stimuli (learned in Part 2). At the same time drug-associated stimuli are presented in the background measuring to which extent they conflict with the learned instrumental behavior. In the last part, query trials are implemented in which the participants have to choose between two pictures to assess the relative cue value.

Social exclusion will be assessed using the cyberball paradigm: subjects will play an online game tossing a ball to each other with two more virtual co-players. Using a cover story, we make subjects believe that the co-players really exist and that they play a live online game. During social exclusion, subjects will be systematically excluded by one co-player, and during social inclusion, ball tosses will be balanced between all three players.
Assessing acute stress effects in AUD and HC subjects
  • Sociodemographics
  • ASSIST
  • Quantity Frequency: Alcohol, tobacco/e-cigarette, Cannabis & other illegal drugs
  • SCID: AUD criteria and tabak use disorder life time and last year & acute depressive symptoms & symptoms for Mania and psychotic disorder
  • Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (EHI)
  • Fagerström Test for Nicotine depend (FTND)
  • Barratt Impulsiveness Scale - Kurzversion (BIS-15)
  • Allgemeine Depressionsskala (ADS)
  • State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T)
  • Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT)
  • Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Test (CUDIT)
  • CAS -A (Alkohol)
  • Fragebogen zur Sozialen Unterstützung (F-SozU K-14)
  • Oslo-3-Items-Social-Support Scale
  • Social Skills Rating System (SSRS)
  • Trier Inventory for chronic stress (TICS)
  • Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaires (RSQ-9)
  • Need to belong scale (NTBS)
  • Fragebogen zu Gedanken und Gefühlen (FGG-14)
  • Internationale Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ)
  • Zahlen-Symbol-Test (DST)
  • Wortschatztest (verbal intelligence)
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule(PANAS)
subjective arousal, subjective stress, valence, perceived ostracisms/loneliness
  • Need Threat Scale
  • Manipulation check (VAS scale)
Social inclusion will be assessed using the cyberball paradigm: subjects will play an online game tossing a ball to each other with two more virtual co-players. Using a cover story, we make subjects believe that the co-players really exist and that they play a live online game. During social inclusion, ball tosses will be balanced between all three players.
Experimental: Control (HC) - inclusion first
Healthy participants without SUD Cyberball: Inclusion Day 1; Cyberball: Exclusion Day 2

The paradigm consists of four parts:

In the first part, an instrumental learning task is completed in which subjects must learn which stimuli require a response and which do not. In the second part, a classical (Pavlovian) conditioning task is then completed in which subjects learn by passive viewing which stimuli are associated with certain amounts of money. The third part measures to which instrumental responses (learned in Part 1) are modulated by the presentation of the classically conditioned stimuli (learned in Part 2). At the same time drug-associated stimuli are presented in the background measuring to which extent they conflict with the learned instrumental behavior. In the last part, query trials are implemented in which the participants have to choose between two pictures to assess the relative cue value.

Social exclusion will be assessed using the cyberball paradigm: subjects will play an online game tossing a ball to each other with two more virtual co-players. Using a cover story, we make subjects believe that the co-players really exist and that they play a live online game. During social exclusion, subjects will be systematically excluded by one co-player, and during social inclusion, ball tosses will be balanced between all three players.
Assessing acute stress effects in AUD and HC subjects
  • Sociodemographics
  • ASSIST
  • Quantity Frequency: Alcohol, tobacco/e-cigarette, Cannabis & other illegal drugs
  • SCID: AUD criteria and tabak use disorder life time and last year & acute depressive symptoms & symptoms for Mania and psychotic disorder
  • Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (EHI)
  • Fagerström Test for Nicotine depend (FTND)
  • Barratt Impulsiveness Scale - Kurzversion (BIS-15)
  • Allgemeine Depressionsskala (ADS)
  • State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T)
  • Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT)
  • Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Test (CUDIT)
  • CAS -A (Alkohol)
  • Fragebogen zur Sozialen Unterstützung (F-SozU K-14)
  • Oslo-3-Items-Social-Support Scale
  • Social Skills Rating System (SSRS)
  • Trier Inventory for chronic stress (TICS)
  • Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaires (RSQ-9)
  • Need to belong scale (NTBS)
  • Fragebogen zu Gedanken und Gefühlen (FGG-14)
  • Internationale Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ)
  • Zahlen-Symbol-Test (DST)
  • Wortschatztest (verbal intelligence)
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule(PANAS)
subjective arousal, subjective stress, valence, perceived ostracisms/loneliness
  • Need Threat Scale
  • Manipulation check (VAS scale)
Social inclusion will be assessed using the cyberball paradigm: subjects will play an online game tossing a ball to each other with two more virtual co-players. Using a cover story, we make subjects believe that the co-players really exist and that they play a live online game. During social inclusion, ball tosses will be balanced between all three players.
Experimental: Moderate to sever alcohol users (AUD) - exclusion first
Participants with alcohol use disorder (moderate to severe if no withdrawal symptoms) and no other substance use disorder (SUD) Cyberball: Exclusion Day 1; Cyberball: Inclusion Day 2

The paradigm consists of four parts:

In the first part, an instrumental learning task is completed in which subjects must learn which stimuli require a response and which do not. In the second part, a classical (Pavlovian) conditioning task is then completed in which subjects learn by passive viewing which stimuli are associated with certain amounts of money. The third part measures to which instrumental responses (learned in Part 1) are modulated by the presentation of the classically conditioned stimuli (learned in Part 2). At the same time drug-associated stimuli are presented in the background measuring to which extent they conflict with the learned instrumental behavior. In the last part, query trials are implemented in which the participants have to choose between two pictures to assess the relative cue value.

Social exclusion will be assessed using the cyberball paradigm: subjects will play an online game tossing a ball to each other with two more virtual co-players. Using a cover story, we make subjects believe that the co-players really exist and that they play a live online game. During social exclusion, subjects will be systematically excluded by one co-player, and during social inclusion, ball tosses will be balanced between all three players.
Assessing acute stress effects in AUD and HC subjects
  • Sociodemographics
  • ASSIST
  • Quantity Frequency: Alcohol, tobacco/e-cigarette, Cannabis & other illegal drugs
  • SCID: AUD criteria and tabak use disorder life time and last year & acute depressive symptoms & symptoms for Mania and psychotic disorder
  • Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (EHI)
  • Fagerström Test for Nicotine depend (FTND)
  • Barratt Impulsiveness Scale - Kurzversion (BIS-15)
  • Allgemeine Depressionsskala (ADS)
  • State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T)
  • Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT)
  • Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Test (CUDIT)
  • CAS -A (Alkohol)
  • Fragebogen zur Sozialen Unterstützung (F-SozU K-14)
  • Oslo-3-Items-Social-Support Scale
  • Social Skills Rating System (SSRS)
  • Trier Inventory for chronic stress (TICS)
  • Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaires (RSQ-9)
  • Need to belong scale (NTBS)
  • Fragebogen zu Gedanken und Gefühlen (FGG-14)
  • Internationale Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ)
  • Zahlen-Symbol-Test (DST)
  • Wortschatztest (verbal intelligence)
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule(PANAS)
subjective arousal, subjective stress, valence, perceived ostracisms/loneliness
  • Need Threat Scale
  • Manipulation check (VAS scale)
Social inclusion will be assessed using the cyberball paradigm: subjects will play an online game tossing a ball to each other with two more virtual co-players. Using a cover story, we make subjects believe that the co-players really exist and that they play a live online game. During social inclusion, ball tosses will be balanced between all three players.
Experimental: Moderate to sever alcohol users (AUD) - inclusion first
Participants with alcohol use disorder (moderate to severe if no withdrawal symptoms) and no other substance use disorder (SUD) Cyberball: Inclusion Day 1; Cyberball: Exclusion Day 2

The paradigm consists of four parts:

In the first part, an instrumental learning task is completed in which subjects must learn which stimuli require a response and which do not. In the second part, a classical (Pavlovian) conditioning task is then completed in which subjects learn by passive viewing which stimuli are associated with certain amounts of money. The third part measures to which instrumental responses (learned in Part 1) are modulated by the presentation of the classically conditioned stimuli (learned in Part 2). At the same time drug-associated stimuli are presented in the background measuring to which extent they conflict with the learned instrumental behavior. In the last part, query trials are implemented in which the participants have to choose between two pictures to assess the relative cue value.

Social exclusion will be assessed using the cyberball paradigm: subjects will play an online game tossing a ball to each other with two more virtual co-players. Using a cover story, we make subjects believe that the co-players really exist and that they play a live online game. During social exclusion, subjects will be systematically excluded by one co-player, and during social inclusion, ball tosses will be balanced between all three players.
Assessing acute stress effects in AUD and HC subjects
  • Sociodemographics
  • ASSIST
  • Quantity Frequency: Alcohol, tobacco/e-cigarette, Cannabis & other illegal drugs
  • SCID: AUD criteria and tabak use disorder life time and last year & acute depressive symptoms & symptoms for Mania and psychotic disorder
  • Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (EHI)
  • Fagerström Test for Nicotine depend (FTND)
  • Barratt Impulsiveness Scale - Kurzversion (BIS-15)
  • Allgemeine Depressionsskala (ADS)
  • State-Trait-Anxiety Inventory (STAI-T)
  • Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT)
  • Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Test (CUDIT)
  • CAS -A (Alkohol)
  • Fragebogen zur Sozialen Unterstützung (F-SozU K-14)
  • Oslo-3-Items-Social-Support Scale
  • Social Skills Rating System (SSRS)
  • Trier Inventory for chronic stress (TICS)
  • Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaires (RSQ-9)
  • Need to belong scale (NTBS)
  • Fragebogen zu Gedanken und Gefühlen (FGG-14)
  • Internationale Trauma Questionnaire (ITQ)
  • Zahlen-Symbol-Test (DST)
  • Wortschatztest (verbal intelligence)
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule(PANAS)
subjective arousal, subjective stress, valence, perceived ostracisms/loneliness
  • Need Threat Scale
  • Manipulation check (VAS scale)
Social inclusion will be assessed using the cyberball paradigm: subjects will play an online game tossing a ball to each other with two more virtual co-players. Using a cover story, we make subjects believe that the co-players really exist and that they play a live online game. During social inclusion, ball tosses will be balanced between all three players.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Behavioral full-lever specific and general PIT (parallel version) effect day one
Time Frame: Day 1

Specific:

Average percentage of alcohol choice difference during the presentation of alcohol or non-alcohol pavlovian background.

General:

Differences in number of button presses during the presentation of positive (+10 Euro) and negative (-10 Euro) pavlovian backgrounds.

Day 1
Behavioral full-lever specific and general PIT (parallel version) effect day two
Time Frame: Day 2

Specific:

Average percentage of alcohol choice difference during the presentation of alcohol or non-alcohol pavlovian background.

General:

Differences in number of button presses during the presentation of positive (+10 Euro) and negative (-10 Euro) pavlovian backgrounds.

Day 2
Social exclusion/inclusion induced using Cyberball Game
Time Frame: Day 1
experimentally-induced social exclusion stress by using the cyberball paradigm: Subjects will play an online game tossing a ball to each other with two more virtual co-players. Using a cover story, we make subjects believe that the co-players really exist and that they play a live online game. During social exclusion, subjects will be systematically excluded by one co-player (partial exclusion), and during social inclusion, ball tosses will be balanced between all three players. Effects of the Cyberball manipulation (social exclusion/inclusion) will be assessed via ratings in Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) and Need-Threat-Scale (NTS).
Day 1
Social exclusion/inclusion induced using Cyberball Game
Time Frame: Day 2
experimentally-induced social exclusion stress by using the cyberball paradigm: Subjects will play an online game tossing a ball to each other with two more virtual co-players. Using a cover story, we make subjects believe that the co-players really exist and that they play a live online game. During social exclusion, subjects will be systematically excluded by one co-player (partial exclusion), and during social inclusion, ball tosses will be balanced between all three players. Effects of the Cyberball manipulation (social exclusion/inclusion) will be assessed via ratings in Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) and Need-Threat-Scale (NTS).
Day 2

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Concentration of cortisol in saliva
Time Frame: Day 1 and Day 2
[Time Frame: Assessment before, during and after Cyberball game (T1: arrival of subject), T2: right before Cyberball game, T3: right after Cyberball game, T4: after PIT part 3 and T5: at the end of testing day)]
Day 1 and Day 2
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)
Time Frame: Baseline and after Cyberball Experiment on Day 1 and Day 2
Scale 1-5, for PA (positive affect) and NA (negative affect) higher scores indicate higher positive and negative affect
Baseline and after Cyberball Experiment on Day 1 and Day 2
Need Threat Scale (NTS)
Time Frame: After Cyberball Experiment on Day 1 and Day 2
Scale from 1 to 5, high scores indicate high needs in Belonging, Control, Meaningful existence and self-esteem
After Cyberball Experiment on Day 1 and Day 2
Heart rate variability
Time Frame: At baseline 5 min AND During experimental part (social inclusion or exclusion) 5 min Day 1 and Day 2
At baseline 5 min AND During experimental part (social inclusion or exclusion) 5 min Day 1 and Day 2

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 11, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alcoholism

Clinical Trials on PIT paradigm

Subscribe