- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06256952
Effect of Social Isolation on the Role of Pavlovian Mechanisms for Control Over Alcohol Use (ReCoDe)
SFB TRR 265: Losing and Regaining Control Over Drug Intake B03: Role of Pavlovian Mechanisms for Control Over Substance Use WP2: Effects of Social Isolation on PIT in AUD
During the first funding period (1st FP) we investigated the impact of acute and chronic stress (Trier Social Stress Test, TSST) on Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT). Moreover, we developed a novel full transfer task that allows assessing both general and specific PIT to investigate whether specific PIT differs between alcohol use disorder (AUD) and control subjects. We found that our online version of TSST induced stress and thereby amplified PIT effects in participants. Preliminary analyses of the full transfer task indicate that AUD participants exhibit a stronger specific PIT effect compared to controls. Based on these findings, we want to assess the following aim for this study:
Investigate the effect of experimentally induced social exclusion on alcohol-specific and general PIT effects in AUD and control participants.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
- Behavioral: PIT paradigm
- Behavioral: social exclusion (Cyberball task)
- Diagnostic test: Saliva samples
- Diagnostic test: basic psychological assessment
- Diagnostic test: pre and post cyberball task
- Diagnostic test: VAS
- Diagnostic test: after cyberball task
- Behavioral: social inclusion (Cyberball task)
Detailed Description
The projects research aim:
The investigators will examine how an experimentally induced social exclusion by the Cyberball task is associated with alcohol specific and general PIT effects by using the newly developed full transfer task from 1st funding period in AUD vs. HCs.
The investigators will use the newly developed full PIT paradigm to examine the modifying effect of experimentally induced social exclusion stress on alcohol-specific and general PIT effects. While using the Trier Social Stress Test in the 1st FP, the investigators now want to go one step further by including social exclusion/ostracism to the stress component, which has not been studied in association with PIT effects yet. The investigators here want to shed light on possible underlying mechanisms which can lead to a promotion of alcohol-seeking by alcohol-stimuli in situations of social exclusion.
Participants (50 AUD and 50 HC) will be assessed at two time points, once after experimentally induced social exclusion and once after social inclusion in a fully balanced, cross-over within-subject design. Subjects will play an online game tossing a ball to each other with two more virtual co-players (Cyberball). Using a cover story, we make subjects believe that the co-players really exist and that they play a live online game. During social exclusion, subjects will be systematically excluded by one co-player (partial exclusion), and during social inclusion, ball tosses will be balanced between all three players. Cyberball usually induces feelings of social isolation and altered behavioral reactions in the subject, which the investigators want to assess by analyzing ball tossing behavior over time, as well as physiological and subjective measures (concentration of cortisol in saliva, heart rate variability and emotions questionnaires, such as the Need to Belong Scale, Rejection Sensitivity Questionnaire, Need threat scale and Positive and Negative Affect Schedule pre and post Cyberball game and after PIT). After the Cyberball experiment, subjects will undergo the transfer part of the full PIT task (using a parallel version at one of the two days in a randomized order).
Hypothesis 1a:
Social exclusion will lead to a stronger stress hormone response (concentration of cortisol in saliva), lower heart rate variability and a stronger general PIT effect compared to social inclusion (main effect social exclusion intervention on PIT).
Hypothesis 1b:
Stronger social exclusion effects in AUD subjects compared to controls will lead to stronger PIT effects compared to social inclusion (interaction effect between group and stress intervention on PIT), especially for alcohol-specific PIT.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Berlin, Germany, 10117
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
-
Contact:
- Andreas Heinz, Prof.,MD,PhD
- Phone Number: +49 30 450 517 001
- Email: andreas.heinz@charite.de
-
Contact:
- Michael N. Smolka, Prof.,MD,PhD
- Phone Number: +49 351 463 42201
- Email: michael.smolka@tu-dresden.de
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Males and females between 18-65 years of age,
- AUD subjects: meet 4 or more criteria for DSM-5 alcohol-use disorder (not requiring withdrawal as assessed by an independent psychiatrist),
- Currently using alcohol without a desire for abstinence,
- Ability to consent to the study and complete the questionnaires.
- Sufficient language skills: German
- Availability between 3pm-6pm on 2 consecutive days,
- existing health insurance
Exclusion Criteria:
- Lifetime diagnosis according to DMS-5 for a: Bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, schizophrenia spectrum disorder, substance dependence except for alcohol, nicotine, cannabis, and/or methamphetamine
- Currently meeting DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for depressive episode, suicidal ideation,
- History of traumatic brain injury or severe neurological disease (such as dementia, Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis)
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding,
- Ingestion of medications known to interact with the CNS in the 10-day period prior to study participation or less than 4 half-lives after last ingestion (rapid urine test),
- Color vision deficiency
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Control (HC) - exclusion first
Healthy participants without SUD Cyberball: Exclusion Day 1; Cyberball: Inclusion Day 2
|
The paradigm consists of four parts: In the first part, an instrumental learning task is completed in which subjects must learn which stimuli require a response and which do not. In the second part, a classical (Pavlovian) conditioning task is then completed in which subjects learn by passive viewing which stimuli are associated with certain amounts of money. The third part measures to which instrumental responses (learned in Part 1) are modulated by the presentation of the classically conditioned stimuli (learned in Part 2). At the same time drug-associated stimuli are presented in the background measuring to which extent they conflict with the learned instrumental behavior. In the last part, query trials are implemented in which the participants have to choose between two pictures to assess the relative cue value.
Social exclusion will be assessed using the cyberball paradigm: subjects will play an online game tossing a ball to each other with two more virtual co-players.
Using a cover story, we make subjects believe that the co-players really exist and that they play a live online game.
During social exclusion, subjects will be systematically excluded by one co-player, and during social inclusion, ball tosses will be balanced between all three players.
Assessing acute stress effects in AUD and HC subjects
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule(PANAS)
subjective arousal, subjective stress, valence, perceived ostracisms/loneliness
Social inclusion will be assessed using the cyberball paradigm: subjects will play an online game tossing a ball to each other with two more virtual co-players.
Using a cover story, we make subjects believe that the co-players really exist and that they play a live online game.
During social inclusion, ball tosses will be balanced between all three players.
|
|
Experimental: Control (HC) - inclusion first
Healthy participants without SUD Cyberball: Inclusion Day 1; Cyberball: Exclusion Day 2
|
The paradigm consists of four parts: In the first part, an instrumental learning task is completed in which subjects must learn which stimuli require a response and which do not. In the second part, a classical (Pavlovian) conditioning task is then completed in which subjects learn by passive viewing which stimuli are associated with certain amounts of money. The third part measures to which instrumental responses (learned in Part 1) are modulated by the presentation of the classically conditioned stimuli (learned in Part 2). At the same time drug-associated stimuli are presented in the background measuring to which extent they conflict with the learned instrumental behavior. In the last part, query trials are implemented in which the participants have to choose between two pictures to assess the relative cue value.
Social exclusion will be assessed using the cyberball paradigm: subjects will play an online game tossing a ball to each other with two more virtual co-players.
Using a cover story, we make subjects believe that the co-players really exist and that they play a live online game.
During social exclusion, subjects will be systematically excluded by one co-player, and during social inclusion, ball tosses will be balanced between all three players.
Assessing acute stress effects in AUD and HC subjects
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule(PANAS)
subjective arousal, subjective stress, valence, perceived ostracisms/loneliness
Social inclusion will be assessed using the cyberball paradigm: subjects will play an online game tossing a ball to each other with two more virtual co-players.
Using a cover story, we make subjects believe that the co-players really exist and that they play a live online game.
During social inclusion, ball tosses will be balanced between all three players.
|
|
Experimental: Moderate to sever alcohol users (AUD) - exclusion first
Participants with alcohol use disorder (moderate to severe if no withdrawal symptoms) and no other substance use disorder (SUD) Cyberball: Exclusion Day 1; Cyberball: Inclusion Day 2
|
The paradigm consists of four parts: In the first part, an instrumental learning task is completed in which subjects must learn which stimuli require a response and which do not. In the second part, a classical (Pavlovian) conditioning task is then completed in which subjects learn by passive viewing which stimuli are associated with certain amounts of money. The third part measures to which instrumental responses (learned in Part 1) are modulated by the presentation of the classically conditioned stimuli (learned in Part 2). At the same time drug-associated stimuli are presented in the background measuring to which extent they conflict with the learned instrumental behavior. In the last part, query trials are implemented in which the participants have to choose between two pictures to assess the relative cue value.
Social exclusion will be assessed using the cyberball paradigm: subjects will play an online game tossing a ball to each other with two more virtual co-players.
Using a cover story, we make subjects believe that the co-players really exist and that they play a live online game.
During social exclusion, subjects will be systematically excluded by one co-player, and during social inclusion, ball tosses will be balanced between all three players.
Assessing acute stress effects in AUD and HC subjects
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule(PANAS)
subjective arousal, subjective stress, valence, perceived ostracisms/loneliness
Social inclusion will be assessed using the cyberball paradigm: subjects will play an online game tossing a ball to each other with two more virtual co-players.
Using a cover story, we make subjects believe that the co-players really exist and that they play a live online game.
During social inclusion, ball tosses will be balanced between all three players.
|
|
Experimental: Moderate to sever alcohol users (AUD) - inclusion first
Participants with alcohol use disorder (moderate to severe if no withdrawal symptoms) and no other substance use disorder (SUD) Cyberball: Inclusion Day 1; Cyberball: Exclusion Day 2
|
The paradigm consists of four parts: In the first part, an instrumental learning task is completed in which subjects must learn which stimuli require a response and which do not. In the second part, a classical (Pavlovian) conditioning task is then completed in which subjects learn by passive viewing which stimuli are associated with certain amounts of money. The third part measures to which instrumental responses (learned in Part 1) are modulated by the presentation of the classically conditioned stimuli (learned in Part 2). At the same time drug-associated stimuli are presented in the background measuring to which extent they conflict with the learned instrumental behavior. In the last part, query trials are implemented in which the participants have to choose between two pictures to assess the relative cue value.
Social exclusion will be assessed using the cyberball paradigm: subjects will play an online game tossing a ball to each other with two more virtual co-players.
Using a cover story, we make subjects believe that the co-players really exist and that they play a live online game.
During social exclusion, subjects will be systematically excluded by one co-player, and during social inclusion, ball tosses will be balanced between all three players.
Assessing acute stress effects in AUD and HC subjects
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule(PANAS)
subjective arousal, subjective stress, valence, perceived ostracisms/loneliness
Social inclusion will be assessed using the cyberball paradigm: subjects will play an online game tossing a ball to each other with two more virtual co-players.
Using a cover story, we make subjects believe that the co-players really exist and that they play a live online game.
During social inclusion, ball tosses will be balanced between all three players.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Behavioral full-lever specific and general PIT (parallel version) effect day one
Time Frame: Day 1
|
Specific: Average percentage of alcohol choice difference during the presentation of alcohol or non-alcohol pavlovian background. General: Differences in number of button presses during the presentation of positive (+10 Euro) and negative (-10 Euro) pavlovian backgrounds. |
Day 1
|
|
Behavioral full-lever specific and general PIT (parallel version) effect day two
Time Frame: Day 2
|
Specific: Average percentage of alcohol choice difference during the presentation of alcohol or non-alcohol pavlovian background. General: Differences in number of button presses during the presentation of positive (+10 Euro) and negative (-10 Euro) pavlovian backgrounds. |
Day 2
|
|
Social exclusion/inclusion induced using Cyberball Game
Time Frame: Day 1
|
experimentally-induced social exclusion stress by using the cyberball paradigm: Subjects will play an online game tossing a ball to each other with two more virtual co-players.
Using a cover story, we make subjects believe that the co-players really exist and that they play a live online game.
During social exclusion, subjects will be systematically excluded by one co-player (partial exclusion), and during social inclusion, ball tosses will be balanced between all three players.
Effects of the Cyberball manipulation (social exclusion/inclusion) will be assessed via ratings in Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) and Need-Threat-Scale (NTS).
|
Day 1
|
|
Social exclusion/inclusion induced using Cyberball Game
Time Frame: Day 2
|
experimentally-induced social exclusion stress by using the cyberball paradigm: Subjects will play an online game tossing a ball to each other with two more virtual co-players.
Using a cover story, we make subjects believe that the co-players really exist and that they play a live online game.
During social exclusion, subjects will be systematically excluded by one co-player (partial exclusion), and during social inclusion, ball tosses will be balanced between all three players.
Effects of the Cyberball manipulation (social exclusion/inclusion) will be assessed via ratings in Positive and Negative Affect Scale (PANAS) and Need-Threat-Scale (NTS).
|
Day 2
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Concentration of cortisol in saliva
Time Frame: Day 1 and Day 2
|
[Time Frame: Assessment before, during and after Cyberball game (T1: arrival of subject), T2: right before Cyberball game, T3: right after Cyberball game, T4: after PIT part 3 and T5: at the end of testing day)]
|
Day 1 and Day 2
|
|
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS)
Time Frame: Baseline and after Cyberball Experiment on Day 1 and Day 2
|
Scale 1-5, for PA (positive affect) and NA (negative affect) higher scores indicate higher positive and negative affect
|
Baseline and after Cyberball Experiment on Day 1 and Day 2
|
|
Need Threat Scale (NTS)
Time Frame: After Cyberball Experiment on Day 1 and Day 2
|
Scale from 1 to 5, high scores indicate high needs in Belonging, Control, Meaningful existence and self-esteem
|
After Cyberball Experiment on Day 1 and Day 2
|
|
Heart rate variability
Time Frame: At baseline 5 min AND During experimental part (social inclusion or exclusion) 5 min Day 1 and Day 2
|
At baseline 5 min AND During experimental part (social inclusion or exclusion) 5 min Day 1 and Day 2
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Roayaee M, Rahman RA, Danziger M, Tudge L, Daedelow LS, Heinz A, Wustenberg T. [The others and I: How social interactions change the perception of other persons. The Cyberball paradigm and its indications in the migration context]. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2020 Feb;88(2):109-117. doi: 10.1055/a-1033-7304. Epub 2020 Feb 26. German.
- Staebler K, Helbing E, Rosenbach C, Renneberg B. Rejection sensitivity and borderline personality disorder. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2011 Jul-Aug;18(4):275-83. doi: 10.1002/cpp.705. Epub 2010 May 25.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 40217046122
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Alcoholism
-
Yale UniversityCompletedFamilial Alcoholism VulnerabilityUnited States
-
Yale UniversityNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)RecruitingFamilial Alcoholism VulnerabilityUnited States
-
Yonsei UniversityTerminated
-
University of Southern DenmarkActive, not recruitingGeneral Practice | Alcohol Abuse Alcoholism | Screening and Brief InterventionDenmark
-
University of FloridaNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)CompletedEffects of Family History of Alcoholism and Sex on Alcohol AnalgesiaUnited States
-
Versailles HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Khoo Teck Puat HospitalNot yet recruitingEmergencies | Alcohol Use Disorder | Alcoholism and Alcohol Abuse
-
Brown UniversityNational Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)CompletedAlcoholic Liver Disease | Alcoholism,United States
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityNational Institutes of Health (NIH); Idorsia Pharmaceuticals Ltd.Not yet recruitingAlcohol Use Disorder
-
Zealand University HospitalNot yet recruiting
Clinical Trials on PIT paradigm
-
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenRecruiting
-
Creative Medical Technology Holdings IncWCG IRBNot yet recruitingBiomarkers | Respiratory Symptoms | Immune Dysfunction | Burn Pit Exposure | Airborne Hazard Exposure | Veteran Health | Deployment-Related Toxic Exposure
-
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU LeuvenRecruiting
-
Technische Universität DresdenCharite University, Berlin, Germany; Central Institute of Mental Health, MannheimRecruitingAlcoholism | Substance Use Disorders | Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD)Germany
-
Foundation University IslamabadCompletedPits and Fissures SealantPakistan
-
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam...University Medical Center Groningen; Erasmus Medical Center; ZonMw: The Netherlands... and other collaboratorsRecruitingChildren with Medical ComplexityNetherlands
-
Nordsjaellands HospitalCompletedPilonidal Sinus of Natal CleftDenmark
-
University of Maryland, College ParkNational Institute on Aging (NIA)Recruiting
-
University Hospital, GhentResearch Foundation FlandersCompletedEpilepsyBelgium, United States
-
Turku University HospitalTurku University of Applied SciencesCompletedAdvanced Cardiac Life SupportFinland