The Effect of Clinical Experience on the Quality of Obturation and Periapical Changes of Teeth Treated With Matched Cones in Combination With Bioceramic Sealer

February 14, 2024 updated by: Mohamed Ahmed Taha Badr, Al-Azhar University
Evaluation of the impact of clinical experience on the quality of obturation and periapical changes of clinical cases using lateral compaction with bioceramic sealers and matched cone obturation with bioceramic sealers both clinically and radiographically.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The idea of using single cone obturation is not novel historically, silver points were used in conjunction with various sealers. It has the advantages of being simple, is easy to learn, quick and does not require any complicated armamentarium or devices. Furthermore, unlike lateral or vertical compaction no force is used, therefore minimizing the risks of dentinal cracks. Recently single cone obturation in combination with bioceramic sealers has been advocated as an alternative obturation technique and is rapidly gaining popularity among dentists. Some studies have demonstrated that the amount of the overall porosity of the single cone fillings is comparable to other techniques.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

54

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 11651
        • Recruiting
        • Al-Azhar University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

patients with symptoms of irreversible pulpitis without apical periodontitis related to the maxillary first premolar ranging from 20 to 40 years old and with separate roots were selected from patients referred to the diagnosis clinic, Faculty of dental medicine Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Boys branch.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with any systemic disorders.
  2. Pregnancy.
  3. teeth with positive response to palpation test
  4. Non vital teeth.
  5. Teeth with positive response to percussion test.
  6. Teeth with mobility of grade II or III.
  7. teeth with probing depth more than 3 mm.
  8. Teeth with abnormal morphology.
  9. Teeth with root curvatures more than 20 degree (according to Schneider's method).
  10. Teeth with internal or external root resorption.
  11. Teeth with vertical root fracture.
  12. Teeth with open apices.
  13. Teeth with any root canal type other than type I.
  14. Patients with (VDS) test with score 4 or less. 15- teeth with fused roots or single root.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experienced dentist using lateral compaction with bioceramic sealer group.
The canals in this group obturation were obturated by an Experienced dentist using lateral compaction with bioceramic sealer.
Root canal treatment using bioceramic sealers.
Experimental: Unexperienced dentist using lateral compaction with bioceramic sealer group.
The canals in this group obturation were obturated by an Unexperienced dentist using lateral compaction with bioceramic sealer.
Root canal treatment using bioceramic sealers.
Experimental: Experienced dentist using Single cone with bioceramic sealer group.
The canals in this group obturation were obturated by an Experienced dentist using Single cone with bioceramic sealer.
Root canal treatment using bioceramic sealers.
Experimental: Unexperienced dentist using Single cone with bioceramic sealer group.
The canals in this group obturation were obturated by an Unexperienced dentist using Single cone with bioceramic sealer.
Root canal treatment using bioceramic sealers.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative pain assessment
Time Frame: 24 hours

The postoperative pain assessment was done using the modified verbal descriptor scale as follows:

None (Score0), Mild(Score1), Moderate (Score2), and severe (Score3).

24 hours
Postoperative pain assessment
Time Frame: 48 hours

The postoperative pain assessment was done using the modified verbal descriptor scale as follows:

None (Score0), Mild(Score1), Moderate (Score2), and severe (Score3).

48 hours
Postoperative pain assessment
Time Frame: 72 hours

The postoperative pain assessment was done using the modified verbal descriptor scale as follows:

None (Score0), Mild(Score1), Moderate (Score2), and severe (Score3).

72 hours
Postoperative pain assessment
Time Frame: 96 hours

The postoperative pain assessment was done using the modified verbal descriptor scale as follows:

None (Score0), Mild(Score1), Moderate (Score2), and severe (Score3).

96 hours
Postoperative pain assessment
Time Frame: 120 hours

The postoperative pain assessment was done using the modified verbal descriptor scale as follows:

None (Score0), Mild(Score1), Moderate (Score2), and severe (Score3).

120 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The quality of obturation and the voids within the root canal filling
Time Frame: 24 hours
the quality of obturation and the voids within the root canal filling were evaluated using Modified Coll and Sadrian criteria.
24 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 18/1/2024

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obturation

Clinical Trials on Experienced dentist using lateral compaction with bioceramic sealer.

Subscribe