Effect of Structured Training Program in Diabetic Patients

February 8, 2024 updated by: Subhasish Chatterjee, Maharishi Markendeswar University (Deemed to be University)

Effect of Structured Training Program on Functional Abilities in Patients With Diabetic Neuropathy

Diabetic neuropathy, a challenging condition resulting from poorly managed type-1 or type-2 diabetes mellitus, often proves resistant to conventional medications when it comes to alleviating the associated symptoms. In such cases, implementing a well-organized exercise regimen has proven beneficial in mitigating diverse symptoms associated with the condition and enhancing the overall quality of life for affected individuals.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The goal of this type of interventional study is to assess the effect a well-defined exercise program for individuals with DPN, despite the existence of various individualized exercise programs designed for DPN patients. The main questions this study aims to answer is:

What is the effect of a 4-weeks structured training program as an adjunct to general lower limb exercise in patients with DPN on pain, sensory symptoms, balance, vibration sense and Quality of life?

Group 1:

Patients in group 1 will receive a structured exercise program.

Group 2:

Patients in group 2 will receive a non-structured exercise program. This group will allow us to compare the effects of a structured and a non-structured exercise program.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Haryana
      • Ambala, Haryana, India, 133207
        • Recruiting
        • MMIPR
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Subhashish Chatterjee, MPT

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diabetes mellitus with moderate to severe DPN
  • Subjects of both gender
  • Age from 40 to 70 years
  • Independent walking
  • MNSI score more than 2 out of 13

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of an active planter ulcer
  • History of surgery during intervention period
  • Neurological diseases other than DPN

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group-1 (Structured Exercise Program)
Patients undergo structured exercise sessions lasting 30 minutes, encompassing activities such as range of motion, flexibility exercises, strength training, balance exercises, and aerobic exercises, with designated intervals between each session.
30 minutes of structured exercise programs
Other: Group-2 (Non-Structured Exercise Program)
Patients are provided with a simple exercise routine that lacks a structured format.
Non structured exercises

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Michigan neuropathy screening instrument (MNSI)
Time Frame: The measurement will be taken during the baseline assessment and again after the completion of treatment.
The scale consists of two parts: the first part involves a patient history assessment, while the second part focuses on physical examination. This scale is considered both reliable and practical for evaluating the severity of neuropathy. If the patient's score increases, it indicates a higher severity of the disease, whereas if the score decreases, it suggests a lower severity.
The measurement will be taken during the baseline assessment and again after the completion of treatment.
Biothesiometer
Time Frame: The measurement will be taken during the baseline assessment and again after the completion of treatment.
This objective measure is utilized to assess the vibratory pressure threshold in affected areas. It possesses the capability to detect various frequencies for vibratory pressure threshold assessment. It is regarded as a practical tool for evaluating both superficial and vibratory sensations. If there is an increased perception of frequency, it indicates that the vibratory pressure threshold is more severely affected.
The measurement will be taken during the baseline assessment and again after the completion of treatment.
NeuroQoL
Time Frame: The measurement will be taken during the baseline assessment and again after the completion of treatment.
The Neuropathy-and Foot-Ulcer Specific Quality of Life Instrument is designed as a Likert scale and serves as a reliable method for assessing quality of life related to neuropathy. If the scoring indicates a higher value, it suggests that the disease is more severe.
The measurement will be taken during the baseline assessment and again after the completion of treatment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
NPRS
Time Frame: The measurement will be taken during the baseline assessment and again after the completion of treatment.
The Numeric Pain Rating Scale, ranging from 0 to 10, is employed as a subjective assessment tool to measure an individual's pain perception. In general, higher scores on the scale indicate a greater severity of pain linked to the disease.
The measurement will be taken during the baseline assessment and again after the completion of treatment.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Khushboo Kumari, BPT, (MPT), Maharishi Markandeshwar Instirtute of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation, Ambala, Haryana, 133207

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 8, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 8, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 31, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IEC-2418

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

Clinical Trials on Structured Exercise Program

Subscribe