- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05878145
Study on Rehabilitation Exercise Program for Community-based Spinal Cord Injury Patients
June 2, 2024 updated by: Sungchul Huh, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
Study on the Safety and Effectiveness of a Rehabilitation Exercise Program for Community-based Spinal Cord Injury Patients
In the case of spinal cord injury, patients have shown a passive attitude towards participating in leisure sports or exercise programs, and there is a lack of suitable guidelines or experience in the local community for coaching exercise and sports for spinal cord injury patients, which makes coaches feel burdened when coaching these patients.
Therefore, in this study, a suitable comprehensive exercise program will be designed and prescribed for patients who reside in the local community and want to participate in leisure sports, and the effectiveness and safety of the program will be verified.
Based on the results, the aim of the study is to provide evidence that spinal cord injury patients can exercise safely and confidently in the local community in the future.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Spinal cord injury is classified into complete paralysis and incomplete paralysis depending on the degree of spinal cord damage.
In the case of complete paralysis, functional recovery is almost impossible, but in the case of incomplete paralysis, the level of functional recovery is determined through active rehabilitation exercises.
In the past, most spinal cord injuries were traumatic, but due to the decrease in accidents, traumatic spinal cord injuries have decreased, and the incidence of non-traumatic spinal cord injuries (spinal cord disorders) has increased significantly due to aging.
Most people with spinal cord injuries have difficulty performing appropriate rehabilitation exercises in the local community due to mobility impairments and limitations in daily activities.
Spinal cord injury patients who participate in existing disabled sports are limited to some (relatively young) patients who have received epilepsy diagnosis.
Individualized rehabilitation exercises based on each patient's personalized protocol are necessary, and sufficient functional recovery can be achieved through this approach.
It is predicted that rehabilitation exercises through a protocol will improve cardiac and respiratory function and quality of life.
Rehabilitation exercises for spinal cord injury patients should be applied based on accurate evaluation of function, and assessment of exercise-related risk factors should also be conducted.
Customized exercise programs based on individual exercise function evaluations should be applied, but currently there is a lack of rehabilitation exercise programs that consider this.
Additionally, risk factor evaluations related to exercise are not being conducted.
Therefore, the development and application of patient-tailored community-based rehabilitation exercise programs for spinal cord injury patients that include risk factor evaluations and functional assessments are necessary.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
57
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Gyeongnam
-
Yangsan, Gyeongnam, Korea, Republic of, 50612
- Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Spinal cord injury patients who are 19 years old or above and residing in the local community
- A person who can walk independently for more than 10 meters without assistance from others
Exclusion Criteria:
- Individuals who have difficulty understanding the exercise program or expressing their symptoms
- Individuals who cannot participate in the intervention exercise program due to serious cardiovascular diseases
- Individuals who are deemed unsuitable for this study by a specialist in rehabilitation medicine due to other medical conditions
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention group
A 20-session structured rehabilitation exercise program in those with spinal cord injuries
|
Stretching (10 mins): neck, shoulder, wrist, back; Aerobic exercise (20 mins): cycle ergometer, wheelchair run; Strengthening exercise (15 mins): shoulder press, chest press, front raise, biceps curl, lateral raise, bent over rowing or rowing, bent over lateral raise, triceps extension; Balance training (5 mins); Stretching exercise (10 mins)
|
|
No Intervention: Control group
No exercise intervention in those with spinal cord injuries
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
EuroQol 5 Dimension 5 Level
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 2 months of exercise program
|
Self-report survey that measures quality of life across 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
Converting the patient's response results using quality weights has a value between 0.000 and 1.000.
A higher score means a higher quality of life.
|
Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 2 months of exercise program
|
|
6 minute walk distance
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 2 months of exercise program
|
Sub-maximal exercise test used to assess aerobic capacity and endurance.
Longer distances indicate better athletic ability.
|
Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 2 months of exercise program
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Spinal cord independence measure III
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 2 months of exercise program
|
Tool to evaluate independence of spinal cord injury patients.
The total score ranges from 0 to 100, and the higher the score, the more independent the patient is.
|
Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 2 months of exercise program
|
|
Berg balance scale
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation after average 2 months of exercise program
|
Testing tool with high validity and reliability used to measure balance.
Each item is scored 0-4 points, with a total score of 0-56 points.
A higher score means better balance ability.
|
Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation after average 2 months of exercise program
|
|
Timed up and go test
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 2 months of exercise program
|
Reliable and valid test for quantifying functional mobility.
The time it takes for a patient to get up from a chair, walk 3 meters, and come back to sit down is measured.
The shorter the time, the better the mobility.
|
Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 2 months of exercise program
|
|
Grip strength
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 2 months of exercise program
|
Force applied by the hand to pull on or suspend from objects.
It is widely used to assess sarcopenia and as a surrogate indicator of muscle strength.
Measured in kg, the higher the value, the stronger the grip is considered.
|
Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 2 months of exercise program
|
|
30 second sit to stand test
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 2 months of exercise program
|
Testing leg strength and endurance.
It measures the number of times a person can stand up from a chair and sit down again in 30 seconds, and the higher the number, the better function and strength.
|
Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 2 months of exercise program
|
|
Sit and reach test
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 2 months of exercise program
|
Test to measure hamstring and low back flexibility.
It is expressed in centimeters (cm), and if the fingertips touch in front of the toes, it is recorded as a positive number (+), and if the fingertips touch behind the toes, it is recorded as a negative number (-).
|
Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 2 months of exercise program
|
|
Beck anxiety inventory
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 2 months of exercise program
|
Anxiety measuring tool.
Each item is scored 0-3 points, with a total score of 0-63 points.
A score of 0-7 indicates minimal anxiety, a score of 8-15 indicates mild anxiety, a score of 16-25 indicates moderate anxiety, and a score of 26-63 indicates severe anxiety.
|
Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 2 months of exercise program
|
|
Beck depression inventory
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 2 months of exercise program
|
Depression measuring tool.
Each item is scored 0-3 points, with a total score of 0-63 points.
A score of 0-13 indicates minimal depression, a score of 14-19 indicates mild depression, a score of 20-28 indicates moderate depression, and a score of 29-63 indicates severe depression.
|
Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 2 months of exercise program
|
|
Fat-free mass from bioelectrical impedance analysis
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 2 months of exercise program
|
A method used to measure the components of the body.
It is the total amount (kg) of body components excluding body fat, and the higher it is, the better the body composition is interpreted.
|
Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 2 months of exercise program
|
|
Fat-free mass index from bioelectrical impedance analysis
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation after average 2 months of exercise program
|
A method used to measure components of the body.
This is an indicator that standardizes fat-free mass according to body size.
The higher it is, the more muscle mass and the better health.
|
Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation after average 2 months of exercise program
|
|
Percent body fat from bioelectrical impedance analysis
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 2 months of exercise program
|
A method used to measure the components of the body.
The normal range varies depending on age and gender.
The lower the score within the general normal range, the better the health.
The higher it is, the higher the risk of obesity-related diseases.
|
Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 2 months of exercise program
|
|
skeletal muscle mass from bioelectrical impedance analysis
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 2 months of exercise program
|
A method used to measure the components of the body.
Normal range varies depending on age and gender.
The higher it is within the general normal range, the better the health.
The lower it is, the higher the risk of lack of strength and sarcopenia.
|
Baseline evaluation and follow-up evaluation immediately after average 2 months of exercise program
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sung-Hwa Ko, PhD, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
May 27, 2023
Primary Completion (Actual)
March 31, 2024
Study Completion (Actual)
March 31, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 27, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 17, 2023
First Posted (Actual)
May 26, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
June 4, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 2, 2024
Last Verified
June 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- SCI REHAB EXERCISE RCT
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Rehabilitation
-
Mississippi State UniversityUniversity of Mississippi Medical CenterNot yet recruitingPostoperative Rehabilitation | Hand Injury RehabilitationUnited States
-
Ankara Etlik City HospitalRecruitingStroke Rehabilitation | Stroke Rehabilitation and CaregiversTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Asan Medical CenterRecruitingPulmonary Rehabilitation | Cardiac RehabilitationKorea, Republic of
-
Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität MünsterNational Paralympic Committee Germany (NPCG)CompletedCardiac Rehabilitation | Feasibility Studies | Organization and Administration | Rehabilitation ExerciseGermany
-
University Hospital, ToursCompletedPulmonary Rehabilitation | Respiratory RehabilitationFrance
-
Suleyman Demirel UniversityCompleted
-
Orton Orthopaedic HospitalCompleted
-
Stanford UniversityRecruitingRehabilitationUnited States
-
Cairo UniversityRecruiting
-
Bruyere Research InstituteBruyere Academic Medical OrganizationRecruiting
Clinical Trials on Structured rehabilitation exercise program
-
Istanbul University - CerrahpasaNot yet recruitingExercise Training | Pediatric-Onset Multiple Sclerosis (POMS)
-
Maharishi Markendeswar University (Deemed to be...Recruiting
-
University Hospital of North NorwayHelse NordWithdrawnQuality of Life | Urinary Incontinence | Anal Incontinence | Sexual FunctionNorway
-
Hospital General de México Dr. Eduardo LiceagaNational Council of Science and Technology, Mexico; Universidad Nacional Autonoma... and other collaboratorsUnknownLiver Diseases | Obesity | Metabolic Syndrome | Exercise | Childhood Obesity | Cardiovascular Risk FactorMexico
-
Miray BudakCompletedBilateral Vestibular HypofunctionTurkey
-
Munzur UniversityRecruiting
-
Hamad Medical CorporationSeth Gordhandas Sunderdas Medical CollegeNot yet recruitingSubacromial Impingement Syndrome
-
University of Modena and Reggio EmiliaUnknown
-
Uludag UniversityRecruitingExercise | Falls Prevention | PARKINSON DISEASE (Disorder)Turkey (Türkiye)
-
Fenerbahce UniversityRecruitingSleep Wake Disorders | Autonomic Nervous System Diseases | Menopausal Symptoms | PostmenopausalTurkey (Türkiye)