Investigation of the Relationship Between Central Sensitization and Neuropathic Pain in Lumbar Disc Herniation

February 13, 2024 updated by: Marmara University

Does Central Sensitization Mediate Neuropathic Complaints in Lumbar Disc Herniation? A Cross-sectional Observational Study

Central sensitization (CS) is as increased response to normal or sub-threshold stimuli of central nervous system and its close relationship with in many musculoskeletal diseases with chronic pain has been demonstrated in several studies. CS is also one of the main mechanisms proposed in the generation of neuropathic pain, and the relationship between pain sensitization and neuropathic complaints has been shown in different diseases.In this study, it was aimed to investigate the effect of central sensitization on the distribution pattern and neuropathic character of pain in patients with lumbar disc herniation who applied to the physical medicine and rehabilitation outpatient clinic.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is one of the leading causes of musculoskeletal pain and its lifetime prevalence is around 80%. Different types of pain can be seen in patients with LDH, which are classified by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) as nociceptive low back pain, somatic referred pain, radicular pain, and radiculopathy. While nociceptive low back pain originates from the structures in the lumbar spine, this pain is characterized as somatic referred pain when it spreads to the lower extremities. Radicular pain is different from these two pains in mechanism and character, and neuropathic complaints accompany axial pain. LDH is also the most common cause of lumbar radicular pain and causes neuropathic pain by irritation of the spinal nerve or dorsal root ganglion. In recent studies, it has been shown that nociceptor hyperexcitability and continuous stimulus discharge into the central nervous system play an important role in the formation of neuropathic pain. This mechanism is also encountered in central sensitization (CS), which is well-known to be associated with chronic pain and characterized by increased response to painful stimuli. Although there are many definitions of CS in the literature, one of the most comprehensive definitions was made as "Changes in the membrane excitability of the central pain pathways and changes in the synaptic transmission of the dorsal anterior horn cells and a decrease in the inhibition of the descending pathways". In animal models, inflammation-mediated spinal microglia activation has been shown to play a role in chronic radicular pain secondary to disc herniation, which has been associated with the development of central sensitization. A study showed that the frequency of CS is increased in patients with chronic low back pain, and this rate is variable in patients with LDH. In addition, data on the role of CS in LDH-related pain, especially radicular pain, are increasing.Considering all these data, CS is likely to affect pain in various ways in patients with LDH, particularly in its severity, extent, and neuropathic component. Therefore, in this study, it was aimed to investigate the relationship between CS accompanying LDH patients with pain characteristics and neuropathic pain development.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

180

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Fevzi Çakmak Mah, Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Cd, Pendik
      • Istanbul, Fevzi Çakmak Mah, Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Cd, Pendik, Turkey, 34899
        • Recruiting
        • Marmara University School of Medicine
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The patients aged 18-65 years diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation will be recruited from a PMR outpatient clinic of a state hospital

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Having a diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation Accepting to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

Concomitant active systemic inflammatory disease, infection and malignancy Having disease that will cause neuropathic pain in the other lower extremity, such as polyneuropathy, multiple sclerosis etc Refusing to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients
Patients with lumbar disc herniation
Standardized questionnaire to determine the level of central sensitization. Patients with a score of 40 and above are considered to have central sensitization.
Other Names:
  • CSI
Standardized questionnaire to investigate the quality of life in patients. The score of the scale is between 0-100. The higher scores are associated with greater deterioration in quality of life.
Other Names:
  • SF-36
global pain score on a 0 to 10
Other Names:
  • VAS
With this scale, it is questioned to what extent the patient is affected by low back pain in selected daily living activities under certain ten headings. In total scoring, disability is expressed as a percentage, and high scores are interpreted in favor of an increase in disability.
Other Names:
  • ODI
The questionnaire consists of 10 items; while the nature of pain is questioned in 7 items, the other 3 items include brief sensory examination. Patients with a score of 4 or more out of 10 are considered to have neuropathic pain.
Other Names:
  • DN4

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI)
Time Frame: 6 months
25 somatic and psychosocial symptoms, which are frequently found in patients with central sensitization in part A, are questioned. In part B, the presence of diseases whose relationship with central sensitization is well defined is questioned in the patient without participating in scoring. Central sensitization is assumed in patients who score 40 or more over 100 points.
6 months
DN4
Time Frame: 6 months
The DN4 scale was developed in 2005 to detect the neuropathic component of pain.This questionnaire consists of 10 items; While the nature of pain is questioned in 7 items, the other 3 items include brief sensory examination. Patients with a score of 4 or more out of 10 are considered to have neuropathic pain.
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VAS pain
Time Frame: 6 months
The patients pain severity will be evaluated with a 10-cm horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from "0 cm" (no discomfort) to "10 cm" (worst imaginable)
6 months
SF-36
Time Frame: 6 months
The 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) is an oft-used, well-researched, self-reported measure of health.The scale was developed by Ware in 1987 and consists of 36 questions questioning 8 sub-parameters regarding the health status of the person.These parameters are physical function, pain, limitation due to physical and emotional problems, emotional well-being, social function, fatigue and general health perception.
6 months
ODI
Time Frame: 6 months
This scale was developed for assessing the severity of disability in chronic low back pain patients. This scale consists of 10 items that evaluates the limitation of daily life activities of patients in the last month.It is accepted that the higher the score, the higher disability.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Canan Şanal Toprak, Asst.Prof, Marmara University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 16, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 10, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

February 21, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 13, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Central Sensitisation

Clinical Trials on Central sensitization inventory

Subscribe