Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer After Systemic Therapy: Ablative MR-guided Radiotherapy (LAPSTAR)

February 14, 2024 updated by: Lois Daamen, UMC Utrecht

Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer After Systemic Therapy: Ablative MR-guided Radiotherapy, a Randomized Controlled Trial

A randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of local ablative MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) after systemic therapy with current standard treatment alone, on health-related quality of life in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC).

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Rationale: About 40% of patients with pancreatic cancer are diagnosed with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Recommended treatment consists of chemotherapy to prevent disease dissemination and prolong survival. Nevertheless, local tumor growth often causes severe morbidity, including pain, gastrointestinal obstruction, and malnutrition. This has a substantial negative impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Eventually, one-third of patients die due to local tumor growth rather than from systemic disease spread. For palliation of symptoms and improved local tumor control, potentially prolonging survival, minimally-invasive ablative therapies may be effective. Online adaptive stereotactic Magnetic Resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is an innovative treatment modality that enables high-precision ablative radiotherapy for pancreatic tumors. This potentially improves RT efficacy without increasing the risk of RT-related toxicity. Consequently, MRgRT holds promise for the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Objective: To investigate the efficacy of stereotactic MRgRT on HRQoL deterioration-free survival, including death as an event, in patients with LAPC after systemic chemotherapy.

Study design: Nationwide randomized controlled trial (1:1 randomization).

Study population: Patients with LAPC according to Dutch Pancreatic Cancer Group (DPCG) criteria who are not eligible for tumor resection after at least two months of chemotherapy (sample size 150 patients). Also, patients with LAPC who are eligible but choose to refrain from chemotherapy and/or surgery can participate in this trial.

Intervention: Patients in the intervention arm receive 50Gy MRgRT in five fractions over two weeks in one of the four Consortium Centers, followed by standard care, either consisting of continuation of chemotherapy or best supportive care. Patients in the control arm continue standard care without ablative MRgRT.

Main study endpoints: The primary outcome is HRQoL deterioration-free survival from the time of randomization, defined as the Time Until Definitive Deterioration (TUDD) including death as an event. HRQoL is evaluated using the EORTC QLQ-C30 Summary Score. The TUDD is defined as a 10-point minimal clinically important difference compared to baseline, with no further improvement of ≥10 points afterwards. All patients will be offered home monitoring using the Trial@home platform to decrease the burden of trial participation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Nijmegen, Netherlands, 6525 GA
      • Utrecht, Netherlands, 3584CX
        • University Medical Center Utrecht
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • L. A. Daamen, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • M. P.W. Intven, MD, PhD
    • Noord- Brabant
      • Eindhoven, Noord- Brabant, Netherlands, 5623 EJ
    • Noord-Holland
      • Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands, 1081 HV
        • Amsterdam University Medical Center, VUmc
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • A. M.E. Bruynzeel, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pathology proven pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC);
  • At least two (preferably four) months systemic therapy with (m)FOLFIRINOX and/or gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel; or eligibility for chemotherapy but no initiation of chemotherapy based on patients' wish;
  • No option for surgical resection, either because anatomical irresectability based on the surgeon's judgement (assessed on imaging or during explorative laparotomy) and/or frailty (unfit for surgery or chemotherapy) and/or no surgery based on patient's wish.
  • No evidence of distant metastatic disease progression, evaluated by CT Thorax / Abdomen / Pelvis and/or PET-CT scan;
  • Performance status WHO 0-2.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contra-indications for MRI or CT with an intravenous contrast agent according to the protocol of the local radiology and/or radiotherapy departments

    • Contraindications for MRgRT, as determined by the involved expert radiation oncologists of the Consortium
    • <18 years old
    • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention arm
Patients in the intervention arm will receive locally ablative stereotactic MRgRT in addition to standard of care, consisting of 5 times 10 Gy MR guided radiotherapy.
5 fractions of 10 Gray MRgRT in addition to standard of care
No Intervention: Control arm
Patients randomized to the control arm will continue standard of care as described without additional local treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HRQoL deterioration-free survival
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 18 months
HRQoL deterioration-free survival is defined as the Time Until Definitive Deterioration (TUDD) including death from any cause, calculated from the time of randomization. HRQoL is primarily assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) Summary Score.
Through study completion, an average of 18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: From the date of LAPC diagnosis untill either death from any cause or last follow-up, whichever came first, assessed up to 18 months
The time interval between LAPC diagnosis and either death from any cause or last follow-up
From the date of LAPC diagnosis untill either death from any cause or last follow-up, whichever came first, assessed up to 18 months
Patient reported Quality of Life EORTC QLQ-PAN26
Time Frame: At baseline and at 2,4, weeks and subsequently every 2 months. Assessed through study completion, up to 18 months
Part of the Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) using EORTC QLQ-PAN26
At baseline and at 2,4, weeks and subsequently every 2 months. Assessed through study completion, up to 18 months
Patient reported Quality of Life EORTC QLQ-C30
Time Frame: At baseline and at 2,4, weeks and subsequently every 2 months. Assessed through study completion, up to 18 months
Part of the Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) using EORTC QLQ-C30
At baseline and at 2,4, weeks and subsequently every 2 months. Assessed through study completion, up to 18 months
Patient reported Quality of Life EQ5D-5L
Time Frame: At baseline and at 2,4, weeks and subsequently every 2 months. Assessed through study completion, up to 18 months
Part of the Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) using EQ5D-5L
At baseline and at 2,4, weeks and subsequently every 2 months. Assessed through study completion, up to 18 months
The need of subsequent treatments
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 18 months
To assess continuation of systemic therapy and/or administration of subsequent treatments (e.g., surgery, second-line systemic treatment, experimental treatment in clinical studies etc.), recommendations from multidisciplinary team meetings, reasons for refraining from recommended therapy, and reasons for discontinuation of therapy (i.e., start of best supportive care)
Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Treatment response assessed on CT-imaging (graded according to RECIST guidelines)
Time Frame: with available imaging during 18 months follow-up
To assess tumor response on imaging according to RECIST criteria in patients who received imaging procedures during follow-up (no part of the trial follow-up)
with available imaging during 18 months follow-up
CA 19.9 response
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 18 months
To assess serum CA 19-9 response in patients in whom serum CA 19-9 is measured (no part of the trial follow-up)
Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Trial@home monitoring related outcome: feasibility Withings Steel HR smartwatch
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 18 months

To assess the feasibility of the Trial@home monitoring via the Withings Steel HR smartwatch for home monitoring of pancreatic cancer patients.

Compliance Withings Steel HR smartwatch (wear-time): amount of time (hours) in a day that the participant wears the smartwatch. This is calculated by the amount of time the device registers a heart rate. Patients wearing the device for >50% of the observation period will be considered as feasible.

Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Trial@home monitoring related outcome: feasibility Body+ scale
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 18 months

To assess the feasibility of the Trial@home monitoring via the Body+ scale for home monitoring of pancreatic cancer patients.

Compliance rates Body+ scale: compliance with weekly weight measurements is calculated by the number of completed weight measurements divided by the total amount of weeks in the observation period. A compliance rate of at least 75% will be considered as feasible.

Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Trial@home monitoring related outcome: feasibility Whitings Sleep
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 18 months

To assess the feasibility of the Trial@home monitoring via the Whitings Sleep for home monitoring of pancreatic cancer patients.

Compliance Whitings Sleep: compliance with daily sleep monitoring is calculated by the number of nights sleep is measured. A compliance rate of at least 75% nights per week will be considered as feasible.

Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Trial@home monitoring related outcome: feasibility ePRO application
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 18 months

To assess the feasibility of the Trial@home monitoring via the ePRO application for home monitoring of pancreatic cancer patients.

Compliance questionnaires through the ePROapplication: A compliance rate of at least 75% from the scheduled assessments will be considered as feasible.

Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Trial@home monitoring related outcome: digital biomarkers
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 18 months
To exploratively generate digital biomarkers and quantify the correlation between data obtained from the Trial@home platform (Withings Steel HR smartwatch, a Withings Body+ Scale, a Withings Sleep, ePRO) and clinical endpoints (e.g., unplanned hospitalizations, early signs of adverse events, clinical deterioration, performance status, quality of life)
Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Intervention arm related outcome toxicity
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 18 months
To assess acute (3 months) RT-related toxicity measured from the start of MRgRT, according to CTCAE v527
Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Intervention arm related outcome, completion of therapy
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 18 months
To assess completion of therapy
Through study completion, an average of 18 months
Intervention arm related outcome diffusion weighted images
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 18 months
To assess correlation of diffusion weighted images at each treatment fraction and the possible correlation with outcomes for patients treated on a 1.5T MR-Linac
Through study completion, an average of 18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: L. A. Daamen, MD, PhD, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht (RACU)
  • Principal Investigator: A. M.E. Bruynzeel, MD, PhD, Amsterdam University Medical Center, VUmc
  • Principal Investigator: M P.W. Intven, MD, PhD, Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht (RACU)
  • Principal Investigator: H. D. Heerkens, MD, PhD, Radboud University Medical Center
  • Principal Investigator: H. M.U. Peulen, MD, PhD, Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven
  • Principal Investigator: J. J. Bosch, Centre of Human Drug Research

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 8, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

February 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 22, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NL85622.041.24
  • 15030 (Other Grant/Funding Number: KWF)
  • 23U-0725 (Other Identifier: NedMec)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-dentified data generated during the LAPSTAR trial will be made available to other researchers upon request from L.A. Daamen

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

upon request

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

Clinical Trials on MR guided radiotherapy

Subscribe