Relevance of Recording an ECG Trace With a Connected Watch (ECG-MC)

March 28, 2025 updated by: University Hospital, Bordeaux

Feasibility and Diagnostic Relevance of Recording an ECG Trace With a Connected Watch

Over the past few years, various systems have been developed to record ECG traces on an ambulatory basis. The latest connected watch models feature 2-electrode ECG recording. This single (1D) or six derivations (6D) can be used to derive a wealth of information about the heart's rhythm. The information that can be derived from an ECG recording with a derivation goes far beyond̀ simple differentiation between atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm. In contrast, in various clinical situations, a tracing restricted to an intracardiac defibrillator (ICD) may prove falsely normal, wrongly reassuring a patient and delaying management. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the sensitivity of ECG-1D or 6D recordings from a connected watch in measuring electrical parameters, compared with a standard ECG-12D, also to obtain a bank of tracings, to create and validate an artificial intelligence algorithm for the automatic analysis of ECG tracings recorded with a connected watch and also to validate the feasibility and sensitivity of recording an ECG tracing with a connected watch in children.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Single-arm prospective study to evaluate the measurement of electrocardiographic parameters obtained using two non-invasive ECG methods, one 12-lead reference method and the second 1 or 6 leads recorded from a connected watch, in a group of patients with healthy hearts (normal ECG) and 19 pathological groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

3000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Pessac, France, 33604
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital Haut-Lévêque
        • Contact:
          • Pierre BORDACHAR

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients hospitalized or seen in consultation in one of the departments of the Haut Lévêque cardiology hospital,
  • Patient of both sexes, minor (from birth to 18 years) or adult,
  • Free, informed and written consent from the patient or, in the case of minors, from the legal parent (at the latest on the day of inclusion and before any examination required for the research),
  • Subject affiliated to or benefiting from a social security regime.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Person incapable of giving consent,
  • Person subject to a legal protection measure (safeguard of justice, tutorship or curatorship),
  • A person deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Smart watch
ECG done with smart watch
ECG 1D/6D

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of electrical parameters measured using the 2 ECG methods: P-wave amplitude
Time Frame: 36 months
Mean of P-wave amplitude
36 months
Comparison of electrical parameters measured using the 2 ECG methods: P-wave duration
Time Frame: 36 months
Mean of P-wave duration
36 months
Comparison of electrical parameters measured using the 2 ECG methods: QRS amplitude
Time Frame: 36 months
Mean of QRS amplitude
36 months
Comparison of electrical parameters measured using the 2 ECG methods: QRS duration
Time Frame: 36 months
Mean of QRS duration
36 months
Comparison of electrical parameters measured using the 2 ECG methods: QT/QTc
Time Frame: 36 months
Mean of QT/QTc (corrected QT) intervals
36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Creation of bank of anormal ECG trace
Time Frame: 36 months
Number of ECG-1D/6D and 12 derivations
36 months
Compare the diagnostic capabilities of an ECG trace recorded with a watch against the reference method, the 12-lead ECG
Time Frame: 36 months
Accuracy of diagnostic
36 months
Validate the feasibility of recording and sending of ECG tracings with a connected watch at the patient's home
Time Frame: 36 months
Number of ECG-1D/6D and 12 derivations
36 months
Validate the feasibility of recording an ECG trace with a connected watch for a child
Time Frame: 36 months
Number of ECG-1D/6D and 12 derivations
36 months
Validate the sensibility of an ECG trace with a connected watch for a child
Time Frame: 36 months
Quality of ECG-1D/6D
36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pierre BORDACHAR, University Hospital, Bordeaux

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 26, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 26, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 26, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 15, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 22, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 2, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Arrhythmias, Cardiac

Clinical Trials on Smart watch

Subscribe