Cardiac Denervation Ablation Strategy for Severe Sinus Bradycardia

This is a prospective clinical observation and registration study. The investigator aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cardiac denervation ablation as a treatment strategy for severe sinus bradycardia.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Severe sinus bradycardia (SSB) is a common clinical condition that can lead to symptoms such as dizziness, fainting, and even cardiac arrest, posing a serious threat to patients' health and life. The causes of SSB vary: in elderly patients, SSB is often caused by ischemia and degenerative changes in the sinoatrial node, while in younger patients, it is often due to abnormal elevation of vagal nerve tone resulting in slowed heart rate and weakened myocardial contractility. Although implanting a pacemaker can effectively alleviate SSB bradycardia, the incidence of pacemaker electrode-related complications (such as electrode displacement, insulation layer rupture, lead infection, and fracture) is not low. Moreover, the impact of pacemaker implantation on patients' quality of life and the economic burden of regular pacemaker battery replacement impose significant psychological and financial burdens on patients, especially young patients. Clearly, for young SSB patients, if the abnormally elevated vagal nerve tone can be continuously reduced, it would be more effective in treating bradycardia and avoiding pacemaker implantation, which has significant social and economic value.

The investigators has pioneered the technique of cardiac denervation ablation, which can modulate the autonomic nervous tone of the heart and is used to treat autonomic nervous system-related diseases. In a preliminary exploratory study involving 6 SSB patients, investigators found that cardiac denervation ablation for SSB can reduce vagal nerve tone, increase sinus heart rate, and effectively alleviate bradycardia symptoms, thus avoiding the need for pacemaker implantation.

Therefore, based on the preliminary work, this project aims to conduct a prospective observational study and establish a registry. SSB patients who meet the indications for pacemaker implantation will be selected to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cardiac denervation ablation for SSB, its impact on quality of life, and the effectiveness of avoiding pacemaker implantation. The project will establish standardized surgical strategies and protocols for cardiac denervation ablation for SSB, summarize experiences, and lay the foundation for the clinical promotion and guideline revision of catheter ablation for SSB.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

88

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China
        • Recruiting
        • 1Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

SSB patients undergoing cardiac denervation ablation

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Sinus bradycardia and pacemaker implantation indication: long interval with mean heart rate <45 bpm or 3s recorded within 6 months before inclusion;
  2. Negative atropine test: sinus heart rate> 90bpm after atropine injection
  3. SSB related symptoms: dizziness, palpitations, fatigue, amaurosis, syncope, etc.
  4. Age ≥18 and <60 years old;
  5. The patient has agreed to participate in this trial and has signed the informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Previous history of atrial arrhythmia ablation or surgical procedure;
  2. Structural heart disease, chronic liver and kidney dysfunction, diabetes mellitus, neurological diseases.;
  3. Drug-related SSB;
  4. presence of left atrial thrombus;
  5. Pregnant women.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of patients with postoperative recurrence of bradycardia symptoms
Time Frame: 12 months after ablation procedure
Symptoms such as chest tightness, suffocation, amaurosis, syncope with cardiac arrest with mean heart rate <45bpm or ≥3s on 12-lead ECG or Holter
12 months after ablation procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The result of the atropine test
Time Frame: 12 months after ablation procedure
A negative response was defined as a 25% increase in sinus heart rate or an increase in sinus rhythm to 90 bpm after atropine injection.
12 months after ablation procedure
Changes in quality of life measured by Medical Outcomes Study 36- Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36)
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12 months after ablation procedure
Patients' quality of life was assessed by Medical Outcomes Study 36- Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). The scale contains 36 items in 9 categories of physical functioning, role-physica, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, mental health and reported health transition. Subjects' scores ranged from 0 to 900, with higher scores representing better quality of life.
3, 6, 12 months after ablation procedure
Changes in quality of life measured by EuroQol Five Dimensions Questionnaire Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS)
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12 months after ablation procedure
Patients' quality of life was assessed by EuroQol Five Dimensions Questionnaire Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS). Subjects' scores ranged from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing better quality of life.
3, 6, 12 months after ablation procedure
Changes in minmum heart rate
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12 months after ablation procedure
Comparison of postoperative versus baseline minimum heart rate using a 24-hour holter. The device provided to patients prior to discharge or at outpatient visits will be used for this assessment.
3, 6, 12 months after ablation procedure
Changes in mean heart rate
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12 months after ablation procedure
Comparison of postoperative versus baseline mean heart rate using a 24-hour holter. The device provided to patients prior to discharge or at outpatient visits will be used for this assessment.
3, 6, 12 months after ablation procedure
Changes in deceleration capacity
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12 months after ablation procedure
Comparison of postoperative versus baseline deceleration capacity (DC) using a 24-hour holter. Higher DC suggest higher vagal activity. The device provided to patients prior to discharge or at outpatient visits will be used for this assessment.
3, 6, 12 months after ablation procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: yan Yao, PhD, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 13, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 2, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

February 26, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sinus Bradycardia

Subscribe