MRD Response-adapted Allo-HSCT for Adverse-risk AML

July 8, 2024 updated by: Xiao-Jun Huang, Peking University People's Hospital

Measurable Residual Disease Response-adapted Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Adverse-risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia: an Open-label, Randomized, Controlled Trial(TROPHY-AML01)

This TROPHY-AML01 regimen aims to identify the effectiveness and safety of MRD response-adapted allo-HSCT for adverse-risk acute myeloid leukemia in an open-label, randomized, controlled trial.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

1.1 Relapse is the most important cause of transplant failure Acute myeloid leukemia is one the most important hematologic malignancies for adults. According to the criteria of European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2022, approximately 40%-50% of AML patients were categorized into adverse-risk group. The clinical outcomes of these patients receiving chemotherapy alone is poor and the 4-year probability of leukemia-free survival (LFS) after therapy is nearly 10%. Thus, allogeneic hematologic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is considered as the critical consolidation in adverse-risk AML patients, and many AML patients could achieve long-term LFS after allo-HSCT. However, nearly one third of the adverse-risk AML patients would experience relapse after allo-HSCT, and the outcomes of patients with post-transplant are very poor and relapse is also the most important cause of mortality after allo-HSCT. Thus, how to prevent post-transplant relapse is important to further improve the survival of patients with adverse-risk AML.

1.2 Measurable residual disease (MRD) can predict the relapse of AML after treatment.

The detection of MRD is one of the most important methods for defining the depth of remission. Using current sensitive techniques, the presence of 1 residual leukemia cell in 10 000-1 000 000 cells can be detected in patients with morphological complete remission (CR). The most commonly used method for MRD assessment involves (1) the determination of leukemia-associated immunophenotypic patterns (LAIPs) using multiparameter flow cytometry (MFC) and (2) the quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)-based evaluation of expression levels of leukemia-related genes, such as recurrent genetic abnormalities and other mutation types.

1.3 Pre-transplant MRD can predict the relapse of AML after allo-HSCT. MFC is one of the most common methods for MRD monitoring and is the most important method for MRD monitoring for those without leukemia-specific molecular markers. In the systemic review of Buckley et al., pre-transplant MRD was associated with worse LFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.76 [1.90-4.00]), overall survival (OS, HR = 2.36 [1.73-3.22]), and cumulative incidence of relapse (HR = 3.65 [2.53-5.27]).

1.4 The prognostic value of pre-transplant MRD positivity is controversial in adverse-risk AML.

Pre-transplant MRD positivity could predict relapse after allo-HSCT, however, its prognostic value may be more significantly in patients with favorite- and intermediate-risk group. Some authors suggested that pre-transplant MFC MRD was less important in predicting relapse than variables reflecting the biology of the disease (e.g., cytogenetics, molecular marker, or chemotherapy refractory). Receiving repeated consolidation to achieve pre-transplant MRD negativity may not decrease the risk of relapse and improve survival, and patients may experience relapse during consolidation chemotherapy and may suffer additional therapeutic toxicities which may increase the risk of non-relapse mortality after allo-HSCT.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

178

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China
        • Recruiting
        • Peking University People's Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Newly diagnosed AML;
  2. Categorized into adverse-risk group according to ELN 2022 criteria;
  3. 16-65 years of age at the time of diagnosis;
  4. achieving CR after 1 or 2 courses of induction chemotherapies;

4) ECOG PS score of 0 to 1 5) It needs consent from the patients or/and legal guardian, and signature on the Informed Consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Newly diagnosed AML, but categorized into favorite- or intermediate-risk group according to ELN 2022 criteria;
  2. < 16 years, or older than 65 years at the time of diagnosis;
  3. Achieving CR after 3 or more courses of induction chemotherapies, or could not achieve CR after induction chemotherapies;
  4. ECOG PS score of 2 or more;
  5. Patients with other comorbidities or mental diseases that influence the life safety and compliance of patients as well as affect informed consent, enrollment in the research, follow-up visit or result interpretation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention group
According to the MFC MRD status after the first consolidation (MRDcon1), the MRDcon1 positive patients were categorized into high-risk group (i.e., risk stratification). All the patients in high-risk group who fulfilled all inclusion/exclusion criteria were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a second consolidation therapy (intervention group) or receive allo-HSCT directly (control group).

Patients in interventional group could choose one of the following treatment protocols and then receive allo-HSCT if they were CR after the second consolidation:

  1. . Venetoclax plus azacitidine: azacitidine 75mg/m2/d d1-7; venetoclax 400mg/d, d1-21;
  2. . Venetoclax plus CAG: venetoclax 400mg qd d1-14; aclacinomycin 20mg qd d1-4; cytarabine 10mg/m2 q12h subcutaneous injection d1-14; G-CSF 300μg qd d1-14;
  3. . Venetoclax plus IA: venetoclax 400mg qd d1-4; idarubicin 10mg qd d1-4; cytarabine 500mg qd d1-4;
  4. . Venetoclax plus AA: venetoclax 400mg qd d1-7; aclacinomycin 20mg qd d1-7; cytarabine 100mg/m2 qd d1-7.
Active Comparator: Control group
According to the MFC MRD status after the first consolidation (MRDcon1), the MRDcon1 positive patients were categorized into high-risk group (i.e., risk stratification). All the patients in high-risk group who fulfilled all inclusion/exclusion criteria were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive a second consolidation therapy (intervention group) or receive allo-HSCT directly (control group).
Receive allo-HSCT directly without the second consolidation chemotherapy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Event-free survival (EFS)
Time Frame: 1 year
EFS, defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of MRD positivity, relapse, or death due to any cause.
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relapse
Time Frame: 1 year
Relapse, defined as the time from date of randomization to date of leukemia relapse.
1 year
Leukemia-free survival (LFS)
Time Frame: 1 year
LFS, defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of relapse or death due to any cause.
1 year
Non-relapse mortality (NRM)
Time Frame: 1 year
NRM, defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death not preceded by leukemia relapse.
1 year
Overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: 1 year
OS, defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause.
1 year
Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD)
Time Frame: 1 year
aGvHD, defined as the diagnosis of any aGvHD including grade I to IV.
1 year
Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD)
Time Frame: 1 year
cGvHD, defined as the diagnosis of any cGvHD including mild, moderate, severe.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Xiaodong Mo, Peking University People's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 24, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 2, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 8, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Clinical Trials on Intervention group

Subscribe