Artificial Intelligence-based Video Analysis to Detect Infantile Spasms

May 6, 2026 updated by: Johns Hopkins University

A Machine Learning Approach to Infantile Spasms Recognition in Video Recordings

Infantile spasms are a type of seizure linked to developmental issues. Unfortunately, they are often misdiagnosed, causing delays in treatment. The purpose of this study is to develop a computer program that can reliably differentiate infantile spasms from similar, yet benign movements in videos. This computer program will learn from videos taken by parents of study participants. Quickly recognizing and treating infantile spasms is crucial for ensuring the best developmental outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

61

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Johns Hopkins Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants will be recruited from the outpatient and inpatient settings of Johns Hopkins Hospital, an academic medical center located in Baltimore, Maryland offering tertiary and quaternary care.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant age less than 24 months
  • Participant evaluated in the Johns Hopkins Outpatient Center, Johns Hopkins Pediatric Emergency Department or Johns Hopkins Inpatient Units due to spells of abnormal movement or seizure
  • Participant evaluated by a pediatric neurologist during the outpatient or inpatient visit at Johns Hopkins Hospital
  • At least one video recording of the spell of abnormal movement produced by the parent/guardian available for provider review

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Poor video recording quality
  • Entire patient is not in frame

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Confirmed Epileptic Spasms (Positive Class)
Participants diagnosed with infantile spasms based upon historical data and supportive electroencephalography data (i.e. hypsarrhythmia or modified hypsarrhythmia background).
Machine learning software developed to analyze videos and accurately distinguish infantile spasms from visually similar movements.
Epileptic Spasm Mimics (Negative Class)
Participants diagnosed with non-epileptic movements (e.g. Sandifer syndrome, shuddering attacks, stretching, stereotypy, startle reflex, writhing movements, jitteriness, sleep myoclonus) based upon historical data and supportive electroencephalography data (when available).
Machine learning software developed to analyze videos and accurately distinguish infantile spasms from visually similar movements.
Awake and Alert (Negative Class)
Participants exhibiting spontaneous, subtle movements in the awake and alert state.
Machine learning software developed to analyze videos and accurately distinguish infantile spasms from visually similar movements.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Model Sensitivity (Recall)
Time Frame: 2 years
Proportion of true positives which the model classified correctly in the test dataset.
2 years
Model Specificity
Time Frame: 2 years
Proportion of true negatives which the model classified correctly in the test dataset.
2 years
Model Positive Predictive Value (Precision)
Time Frame: 2 years
Proportion of positive classifications which were correct in the test dataset.
2 years
Model Negative Predictive Value
Time Frame: 2 years
Proportion of negative classifications which were correct in the test dataset.
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eric Kossoff, MD, Johns Hopkins Neurology
  • Principal Investigator: Rama Chellappa, PhD, Johns Hopkins Biomedical Engineering

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 26, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 6, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

May 6, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 11, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 18, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Infantile Spasms

Clinical Trials on Spasm Vision

Subscribe