Focused Ultrasound Cavitation Augmented With Aerobic Exercise

March 17, 2024 updated by: Riphah International University

Effect of Focused Ultrasound Cavitation Augmented With Aerobic Exercise in Patients With Central Obesity

This study will determine the combine effects of focused ultrasound cavitation augmented with aerobic exercises. This research could be helpful for the patients who prefer such treatments to make a wise decision that either aerobic exercises in combination with cavitation is the better and much safer treatment option to maintain healthy life.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Abdominal obesity can be treated through invasive and non-invasive procedures. The most common invasive protocol is surgical liposuction, this is mostly useful for removing large volume of fat. Nonsurgical approaches included exercises and selective focus energy which target the subcutaneous adipose tissue including focused ultrasound. Focus ultrasound produce cavitation which results in fat cell lysis through mechanical energy without causing any harmful effect on surrounding nerves and connective tissue.

There is an increasing demand for noninvasive fat reduction methods; there is variety of physical treatments in practice for localized fat reduction such as electrical stimulation, mechanical massage, light based therapies and cold low level laser irradiation but clinically most of them failed to meet expectations. Literature reported that clinically High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) is most effective for noninvasive fat reduction therapy. Ultrasound causes cavitation phenomena on fat droplet watery cytoplasm interface and eventually rupture of adipocytes and triglycerides release, this whole phenomena is caused through generation of compression and decompression cycle at specific frequency. Ultrasound Fat cavitation is the technique of handling obesity, specially by destroying fat and shaping a body part. There is a limited literature available on effects of aerobic exercises and focused ultrasound cavitation on obesity but there was no literature available on combine effects of both treatments. This study will determine the combine effects of focused ultrasound cavitation augmented with aerobic exercises. This research could be helpful for the patients who prefer such treatments to make a wise decision that either aerobic exercises in combination with cavitation is the better and much safer treatment option to maintain healthy life.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • KPK
      • Peshawar, KPK, Pakistan
        • Bioflex Aesthetic Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Females
  • Overweight (Asian BMI scoring)
  • 25 to 40 years of age
  • Central obesity

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Morbidly obesity
  • Hypertension
  • Arthritis
  • Musculoskeletal disorders
  • Cardiovascular disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: focused ultrasound cavitation augmented with aerobic exercise
Ultrasound cavitation single session per week along with the Aerobic exercises. Aerobic Exercise was Treadmill walk for 30 min with moderate intensity
Ultrasound cavitation single session per week along with the Aerobic exercises. Aerobic Exercise was Treadmill walk for 30 min with moderate intensity
Active Comparator: focused ultrasound cavitation
Ultrasound cavitation single session per week along with 6min walk test.
Ultrasound cavitation single session per week along with the Aerobic exercises. Aerobic Exercise was Treadmill walk for 30 min with moderate intensity

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Borg rating of perceived exertion scale
Time Frame: 4 weeks
The Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) scale, developed by Swedish researcher Gunnar Borg, is a tool for measuring an individual's effort and exertion, breathlessness and fatigue during physical work and so is highly relevant for occupational health and safety practice. In its simplest terms, it provides a measure of how hard it feels that the body is working based on the physical sensations that the subject experiences, including increased heart rate, increased respiration or breathing rate, increased sweating and muscle fatigue.
4 weeks
girth
Time Frame: 4weeks
Anthropometry is the measurement of human body dimension such as girths by using surface landmarks for reference. Like other areas of science the procedures and processes depend upon adherence to the particular rules of measurement as determined by national and international standards bodies. The definitions and instructions in this chapter are consistent with the international anthropometric standards body called the International Society for the Advancement of Kinanthropometry (ISAK).
4weeks
6min walk test
Time Frame: 4weeks
The 6 Minute Walk Test is a sub-maximal exercise test used to assess aerobic capacity and endurance. The distance covered over a time of 6 minutes is used as the outcome by which to compare changes in performance capacity
4weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maria Razzaq, MSCPPT, Riphah International university Gulberg Greens D block Islamabad

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 15, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

July 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 18, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Sana Bshir

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Central Obesity

Clinical Trials on focused ultrasound cavitation augmented with aerobic exercises

Subscribe