Effects of Capoeira on the Physical and Psychological Performance of Adults

March 22, 2024 updated by: Sérgio Rodrigues Moreira, Universidade Federal do vale do São Francisco

Effects of Capoeira Training on Physical Performance and Psychological Aspects Performance of Adults: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Regular physical activity (PA) promotes benefits for both physical and mental health. Among the numerous PA's with a collective nature that can add to the existing recommendations, combat sports training interventions are viable alternatives since they integrate benefits in different aspects for health. In this way, capoeira can be a strategy for the prescription of exercise, aiming to serve participants collectively and maintaining the adherence of this practitioner to the intervention. However, little is known about this issue. So, the aim of the present study is to verify the effect of 12 weeks of capoeira training on the physical performance and psychological aspects of previously physically inactive adults.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Detailed Description

The study will be conducted as a controlled, randomized, two-group parallel and superiority clinical trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio. The sample will be divided into two groups: 1) capoeira training group (n = 76; GCAP) and 2) control group (n = 76; GCONT). Participants aged between 18 and 59 years, classified as irregularly active A by the international physical activity questionnaire, who are not engaged in training programs and are not former athletes, will be eligible. Smokers and patients with respiratory or cardiovascular diseases will be excluded from the sample. Anamnesis and anthropometric evaluation will initially be performed. To evaluate the physical aspects, specific tests will be applied to determine aerobic and anaerobic fitness, strength and power of lower limbs, balance, motor coordination and questionnaires will be applied to verify the psychological aspects, such as emotional intelligence, motivation and quality of life. The descriptive analysis of the outcomes will be reported. The normality of the data will be checked by visual inspection of the Q-Q plot and statistically tested by the Shapiro-Wilk test. Two-way ANOVA for repeated measures will be employed to verify the time*group interaction. The effect size (ES) of the intervention on dependent variables will be calculated and the difference between the ES and its respective 95% confidence interval will be calculated to estimate the magnitude of the response in the intervention. The alpha adopted will be 5% and the software used for data analysis will be Statistical Packages for the Social Sciences 25.0.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

42

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pernambuco
      • Petrolina, Pernambuco, Brazil, 56300000
        • UNIVASF

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Classified as "irregularly active A" by the International Physical Activity Questionnaire;
  • Do not be engaged and/or have participated in the last two months of any physical training program;
  • Do not be former athletes;
  • Do not be a smoker or suffering from respiratory or cardiovascular diseases.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Do not have musculoskeletal problems during the program that make it impossible to participate;
  • Do not participating in at least 80% of the training sessions during the intervention.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CAPOEIRA GROUP
The training program will be conducted over 12 weeks with two weekly sessions. Each session will last 60 minutes and will be divided into three parts: 1) initial part: execution of stretches and low-intensity actions with specific movements of capoeira; 2) main part: realization of the training program the schedule present in Table 1 for the learning of attacks, dodges and acrobatic movements or flourishes and; 3) Final part: in a self-selected way in the capoeira roda, the participant will develop the previously learned movements.
The protocol of the capoeira training program and the movements (blows, dodges and flourishes) will be based on the Capoeira Abadá method.
Active Comparator: CONTROL GROUP
The CONTROL GROUP will be conducted over 12 weeks with two weekly sessions. Each session will last 60 minutes and will be divided into three parts: 1) initial part: execution of stretches and low-intensity actions with specific movements of capoeira; 2) main part: continuation with execution of stretches and low-intensity actions with specific movements of capoeira and; 3) Final part: in a self-selected way in the capoeira roda, the participant will develop the previously learned movements.
The protocol of the control group will be based on an intervention with capoeira movements, however, without important cardiovascular, neuromuscular and metabolic demands, being an activity with stretching movements from positions of the capoeira modality itself.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in aerobic fitness (maximal oxygen uptake and anaerobic threshold) at week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and week 12
The maximal oxygen uptake and anaerobic threshold are valid indicators for assessing aerobic fitness
Baseline and week 12
Change from baseline in anaerobic fitness (Peak, average and minimum power in the Wingate test) at week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and week 12
The Peak, average and minimum power in the Wingate test are valid indicators for assessing anaerobic fitness
Baseline and week 12
Change from baseline in muscle strength (Horizontal Leg Press) at week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and week 12
The methods and procedures are valid indicators for assessing muscle strength
Baseline and week 12
Change from baseline in muscle power (Vertical Jump Tests from Squat Jump and Counter Movement Jump) on force platform at week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and week 12
The methods and procedures are valid indicators for assessing muscle power
Baseline and week 12
Change from baseline in balance (Center of Pressure) on force platform at week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and week 12
The methods and procedures are valid indicators for assessing balance
Baseline and week 12
Change from baseline in motor coordination (Test of Gross Motor Development) at week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and week 12
The methods and procedures are valid indicators for assessing motor coordination
Baseline and week 12
Change from baseline in Emotional Intelligence to sport (Likert-type scales with 26 items) at week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and week 12
The methods and procedures are valid indicators for assessing Emotional Intelligence with changes 26 (worst) to 130 (better) points
Baseline and week 12
Change from baseline in Motivation for Sport II (Likert-type scales with 18 items) at week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and week 12
The methods and procedures are valid indicators for assessing Motivation for Sport with changes 1 (worst) to 7 (better) points
Baseline and week 12
Change from baseline in Quality of life measuring by Questionnaire of Word Health Organization (WHOQOL-bref) at week 12
Time Frame: Baseline and week 12
The procedures are valid indicators for assessing Quality of life (26 questions divided into four domains - physical, social, psychological, and environmental) with changes 1 (worst) to 100 (better) points
Baseline and week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 15, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 13, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 15, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2024

Last Verified

March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Ethics Approval: n. 6.683.936

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Training

Clinical Trials on CAPOEIRA TRAINING

Subscribe