The Effectiveness of High-intensity Laser Therapy on Plantar Flexor Muscle Spasticity in Stroke Patients

The Effectiveness of High-intensity Laser Therapy on Plantar Flexor Muscle Spasticity in Stroke

The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of high-intensity laser therapy for treating plantar flexor muscle spasticity in subacute and chronic stroke patients, focusing on its impact on spasticity, joint range of motion, pain, muscle thickness, functional ambulation, and quality of life.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Post-stroke lower limb spasticity disrupts balance and walking, often resulting in decreased walking speed, increased wheelchair use, and the need for caregiver assistance. Various approaches are utilized in spasticity management, including physical therapy, splinting, oral medications, chemical neurolysis, and surgical interventions. Laser therapy is a non-invasive, painless modality used in physiotherapy units, with a low incidence of side effects. Laser therapy has been shown to reduce muscle fatigue and increase peak torque (muscle strength) when applied before exercise. The use of high-intensity laser therapy in physiotherapy protocols has become increasingly common in recent years. Studies suggest that it enhances healing in tendons and ligaments, prevents fibrosis development, increases local blood flow and tissue regeneration, and reduces edema and pain. The aim of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of high-intensity laser therapy for treating plantar flexor muscle spasticity in subacute and chronic stroke patients, focusing on its impact on spasticity, joint range of motion, pain, muscle thickness, functional ambulation, and quality of life.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Ankara, Turkey
        • Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged ≥ 18 and ≤ 75 years
  • Patients experiencing their first stroke (onset > 3 months)
  • Patients with ankle plantar flexor muscle spasticity with a Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score ≥ 1 and < 4
  • Lower extremity Brunnstrom staging ≥ 3
  • Patients describing pain complaints in the affected leg as VAS > 3.
  • Patients who can stand independently or with supervision for at least 2 minutes for measurements taken while standing
  • Patients who can walk independently or with/without assistive devices for at least 10 meters for measurements taken while walking
  • Patients with cognitive abilities sufficient to understand the study instructions (Mini-Mental State Examination score > 23)
  • Patients with stable medical and psychological conditions
  • Patients willing to participate in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with severe cardiovascular or musculoskeletal problems that impair walking (e.g., fixed ankle contracture)
  • Patients who have been treated for spasticity with botulinum toxin, phenol, or alcohol injections in the past 6 months
  • Patients who have undergone antispastic surgery in the treatment area in the past 6 months
  • Patients with recent changes in oral antispastic medication use in the past 6 months
  • Patients with acute inflammation or active infection in the treatment area
  • Patients with a history of ankle joint contracture, fracture, neoplasm, vascular disease, etc.
  • Patients with other neurological (Parkinson's disease, epilepsy, meningitis, cerebellar disease, vertigo, dizziness, polyneuropathy, etc.) or musculoskeletal (severe back pain, knee problems) diseases that could affect balance performance other than stroke
  • Patients with severe vision, hearing, and language problems
  • Patients who do not consent to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Sham group
The same procedure will be followed, but sham laser will be applied at 0 j/cm2 for 10 minutes.
The same procedure will be followed, but sham laser will be applied at 0 j/cm2 for 10 minutes.
Active Comparator: High-intensity laser therapy group
High-intensity laser will be applied continuously to the gastrocnemius muscle for a total of 10 minutes with an energy density of 100 j/cm2, totaling 2500 j.

All patients will receive a rehabilitation program consisting of stretching, strengthening, balance, and walking exercises targeting the lower extremities for 45 minutes, 5 days a week, for 6 weeks. Walking training will initially begin on level ground and gradually progress to different levels and surfaces.

High-intensity laser will be applied continuously in biostimulation mode 3 days a week, once a day, for a total of 9 sessions over 3 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
10-Meter Walk Test
Time Frame: Baseline- 3 - 6 weeks(follow up)
Test to measure patients&#39; functional ambulation skills.
Baseline- 3 - 6 weeks(follow up)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Modified Ashworth Scale
Time Frame: Baseline- 3 - 6 weeks(follow up)
Evaluation of plantar flexor muscle spasticity using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). The original Ashworth scale was a 5 point numerical scale that graded spasticity from 0 to 4, with 0 being no resistance and 4 being a limb rigid in flexion or extension.
Baseline- 3 - 6 weeks(follow up)
Joint Range of Motion (ROM) Measurement
Time Frame: Baseline- 3 - 6 weeks(follow up)
Passive measurement of ankle joint range of motion (ROM) with a goniometer
Baseline- 3 - 6 weeks(follow up)
Ultrasonography
Time Frame: Baseline- 3 - 6 weeks(follow up)
Sonographic measurement of medial gastrocnemius muscle thickness
Baseline- 3 - 6 weeks(follow up)
Timed Up and Go test
Time Frame: Baseline- 3 - 6 weeks(follow up)
To determine fall risk and measure the progress of balance, sit to stand and walking
Baseline- 3 - 6 weeks(follow up)
Stroke Specific Quality of Life Scale
Time Frame: Baseline- 3 - 6 weeks(follow up)

It is a patient-centered outcome measure intended to provide an assessment of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) specific to patients with stroke. Scores range from 49-245.

Higher scores indicate better functioning.

Baseline- 3 - 6 weeks(follow up)
Visual analogue scale for pain (VAS- pain)
Time Frame: Baseline- 3 - 6 weeks(follow up)
Pain intensity was measured with visual analogue scale for pain (0-10 mm; 0 means no pain, 10 means severe pain) which is used to measure musculoskeletal pain with very good reliability and validity.
Baseline- 3 - 6 weeks(follow up)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tugba Atan, Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital
  • Study Director: Yunus Emre Bildik, Gaziler Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 5, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

September 25, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 2, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 27, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Sham laser

Subscribe