Enhancing Respiratory Auscultation Skills Among Medical Students: Digital Stethoscopes in Medical Education

April 5, 2024 updated by: Frank Lin, MD, PhD, Chung Shan Medical University

Enhancing Respiratory Auscultation Skills Among Medical Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Integration of Digital Stethoscopes in Medical Education

Objectives: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of a novel digital stethoscope curriculum integrated into respiratory auscultation training for medical students. It seeks to compare the auscultation proficiency gained through this innovative approach with that from traditional teaching methods, to understand the potential of digital stethoscopes in reinvigorating clinical skills training.

Methods: In a single-center, controlled, longitudinal, randomized experimental design, 84 medical students undergoing clinical clerkship rotations at Chung Shan Medical University Hospital were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to either the intervention group, receiving training with digital stethoscopes and the Eko auscultation software, or the control group, following a traditional curriculum. Pre- and post-intervention assessments measured auscultation skills, and student feedback on teaching quality was collected. The primary outcome was the improvement in auscultation proficiency, while secondary outcomes included student engagement and feedback on the educational approach.

Expected Results: The investigators hypothesize that the integration of digital stethoscopes into the curriculum will significantly improve the auscultation skills of medical students compared to traditional methods. Enhanced engagement and positive feedback from students are anticipated, underscoring the pedagogical value of incorporating digital health technologies in medical education.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Subjects and Procedures Research Methodology The present investigation carried out at a university hospital, was a longitudinal, controlled, single-center, randomized trial with an interventional design. A total of 84 medical students who were completing their clinical clerkship rotations in the Department of Thoracic Surgery were included in the study. The participants were randomized to either the intervention group or the control group.

Intervention The participants in the intervention group were provided with the curriculum titled "Respiratory Auscultation with Digital Stethoscopes," which involved the use of electronic digital stethoscopes and the Eko auscultation software platform developed by Eko Devices in Berkeley, California, USA. The utilization of this methodology enabled the viewing and examination of documented respiratory sounds, which were then shown as phonopneumograms. The participants assigned to the control group were provided with conventional respiratory auscultation training in accordance with the established clerkship curriculum. The curriculum encompassed practical sessions conducted at the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) center, utilizing the SAM II respiratory sound simulator (Cardionics, Webster, Texas, USA). Additionally, instructional videos were provided to facilitate the acquisition of knowledge pertaining to breath sounds. Furthermore, a breathing assignment was assigned to each student, necessitating the recording and description of five distinct breath sounds. The process of gathering data The Zuvio Interactive Response System (Zuvio, Taipei, Taiwan) was used to measure participants' auscultation skills before and after the intervention. This was done by employing a question bank consisting of 50 breath sound audio files. The collection of student feedback regarding the quality of teaching and the helpfulness of the course was conducted by means of surveys employing 5-point Likert scales. Furthermore, the researchers collected data pertaining to OSCE attendance, video viewing, answer-checking behavior, and the time interval between pre-and post-tests. The variables that were assessed included alterations in auscultation test scores and self-reported levels of teaching satisfaction within the two cohorts.

Statistical analysis The data analysis was performed utilizing the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (IBM SPSS Statistics, version 25). A range of statistical tests were employed to comprehensively analyze the distribution of student scores and teaching satisfaction, compare the intervention and control groups, and explore the influence of the course on students' engagement and learning outcomes. The normality of distributions for student scores and teaching satisfaction was initially examined using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. To compare scores and satisfaction levels between the intervention and control groups, either the Student t-test or the Mann-Whitney U test was selected, depending on the distributions. The paired Student's t-test or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used, as appropriate, to assess the changes in scores before and after the course. The study employed the chi-square test to examine the disparity in the proportions of students from both groups who opted to rent electronic stethoscopes subsequent to the completed course. This was conducted as an indirect method to assess the student's level of interest in auscultation and their comprehension of digital stethoscope technology, hence indicating the effectiveness of the course instruction. In addition, the researchers used regression analysis to investigate the relationships between different variables and outcomes, thereby offering valuable insights into the determinants that impact students' learning experiences and preferences. The statistical significance level was set at p<0.05.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

84

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • South
      • Taichung, South, Taiwan, 402
        • Chung Shan Medical University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Medical students who were completing their clinical clerkship rotations in the Department of Thoracic Surgery during the study period.

Exclusion Criteria:

All medical students who did not complete the clinical clerkship rotations, the pre- and post-tests, and the course feedback questionnaire.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Digital stethoscope use
The intervention comprises a comprehensive curriculum titled "Respiratory Auscultation with Digital Stethoscopes," designed to enhance the proficiency of medical students in diagnosing respiratory disorders through auscultation. The curriculum utilizes advanced digital stethoscope technology, specifically electronic digital stethoscopes, and the Eko auscultation software platform, to facilitate the visualization and analysis of recorded breath sounds, thereby augmenting traditional auscultation training methods.
In this interventional study, 84 medical students were randomly allocated to an intervention group utilizing a novel digital stethoscope curriculum or a control group receiving traditional instruction. The intervention leveraged digital stethoscopes, enabling visualization and analysis of recorded breath sounds. Pre- and post-assessments evaluated respiratory
Other Names:
  • video
  • Pre- and Post- test
  • Questionnaire on student feedback
No Intervention: Traditional stethoscope use
The curriculum utilizes a traditional stethoscope.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pre-test and Post-test using the Zuvio Interactive Response System (Zuvio, Taipei, Taiwan)
Time Frame: At the beginning and end of the two-week Thoracic Surgery clinical rotation.
The Zuvio Interactive Response System evaluates participants' auscultation skills through a question bank of 50 breath sound audio files.
At the beginning and end of the two-week Thoracic Surgery clinical rotation.
Student Feedback
Time Frame: End of the two-week Thoracic Surgery clinical rotation.
Helpfulness of the course: Student feedback on teaching quality and course helpfulness was collected through surveys using 5-point Likert scales.
End of the two-week Thoracic Surgery clinical rotation.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Frank CF Lin, MD, PhD, Chung Shan Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

January 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 23, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pneumonia

Clinical Trials on Digital stethoscope use

Subscribe