A COMPARISON OF LEFT VENTRICULAR FUNCTION IN THE APICAL 4 CHAMBER AND SUBCOSTAL 4 CHAMBER TTE VIEWS IN THE PERIOPERATIVE SETTING

April 9, 2024 updated by: Eckhard Mauermann

A COMPARISON OF LEFT VENTRICULAR FUNCTION IN THE APICAL 4 CHAMBER AND SUBCOSTAL 4 CHAMBER TTE VIEWS IN THE PERIOPERATIVE SETTING: A PROSPECTIVE, CLINICAL TRIAL

This study aims to examine the correlation and agreement of regional and global measurements of ventricular function in the apical 4 chamber and subcostal 4 chamber view. Additionally, we will explore limitations of the technology and explore the effect of left lateral positioning.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

In transthoracic echocardiography, a number of measures are endorsed by current guidelines for quantifying ventricular function. These include conventional (mitral annular plane velocities, ejection fraction) and novel, speckle-tracking (STE) technologies. However, these measurements are standardized to be measured in the left lateral decubitus position in the apical (4-chamber) view of awake spontaneously breathing patients.

In the perioperative period, however, attaining these measurements in the endorsed circumstances may be challenging for a number of reasons. First, obtaining usable AP4C images may be difficult in ventilated or post-surgical patients. While the SC4C is generally obtainable visualized structures are not identical to those of the AP4C and measurement technologies such as Doppler are misaligned Secondly, patient conditions (e.g. in distress, or during surgery) may preclude positioning the patient in the left lateral decubitus position. Finally, patients may be ventilated and under anesthesia.

Newer technologies - such as speckle-tracking- may partially overcome these difficulties as these technologies are considered to be relatively angle independent. For quantification, it would be important to know whether or not speckle-tracking based measurements in the SC4C are sufficiently close to those measured under the endorsed conditions.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Basel Stadt
      • Basel, Basel Stadt, Switzerland, 4000
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital Basel
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Consenting adult patients undergoing elective non-cardiac surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to follow the procedures of the study, e.g. due to language problems, psychological disorders, dementia, etc. of the participant,
  • Previous enrolment into the current study,
  • Emergency procedures mandating expeditive patient care,
  • Nonregular heart rhythm
  • Valvular heart disease in the LV at least midgrade

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Randomization
A randomization will be done for the order of the different TTE measurments, but all patients are going the same TTE measurements after all

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
S'Tissue Doppler Index (TDI) AP4C supine vs. S'STE SC4C supine
Time Frame: This is going to be assessed after the trans thoracic echocardiography, through study completion (an average of 1 year)
- Comparison of two velocities measured by two different methods.
This is going to be assessed after the trans thoracic echocardiography, through study completion (an average of 1 year)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Global longitudinal strain (GLS), AP4C supine vs. GLS, SC4C supine, i.e. clinical questions: can we use the SC4C for global markers of ventricular function?
Time Frame: This is going to be assessed after the trans thoracic echocardiography, through study completion (an average of 1 year)
  • Correlation: GLS, AP4C, supine vs. GLS, SC4C supine
  • Bland Altman (BA) Plot: GLS, AP4C, supine vs. GLS, SC4C supine
This is going to be assessed after the trans thoracic echocardiography, through study completion (an average of 1 year)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of high Frame Rate (FR) vs. low FR of the following measures: [ i) S'STE AP4C supine, ii) GLS AP4C supine, iii) SR AP4C supine]
Time Frame: This is going to be assessed after the trans thoracic echocardiography, through study completion (an average of 1 year)
With high Frame Rate (FR) the measures will be more exact than with low FR
This is going to be assessed after the trans thoracic echocardiography, through study completion (an average of 1 year)
Comparison of the measured values in the cardiological gold standard (Left lateral decubitus (LLD)) vs. supine, for the following values [ i) S'TDI AP4C, ii) S'STE AP4C, iii) GLS]
Time Frame: This is going to be assessed after the trans thoracic echocardiography, through study completion (an average of 1 year)
Comparison of values in different patient position for TTE
This is going to be assessed after the trans thoracic echocardiography, through study completion (an average of 1 year)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 14, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 13, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2024

First Posted (Estimated)

April 15, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

April 15, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2020-02868

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiac Functional Disturbances During Surgery

Subscribe