- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06371378
Effect of Different Peep Values on Gastric Residual Volume
October 10, 2024 updated by: Süleyman Taygurt, Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
Evaluation of the Effect of Different Peep Values on Gastric Residual Volume and Pulmonary Aspiration Risk in Patients Undergoing Spinal Surgery in Prone Position
The aim of this study was to predict the effect of gastric antrum diameter before extubation on intra-abdominal pressure changes and consequently on the risk of pulmonary aspiration in patients undergoing elective spinal surgery under general anaesthesia in the prone position in the Neurosurgery Operating Theatre of the Ministry of Health Ankara City Hospital and to take precautions accordingly.
Gastric antrum diameter and intraabdominal pressure measurements may contribute to the improvement of anaesthetic practice by reducing the risk of pulmonary aspiration and additional complications.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Prone positioning in spinal surgery is a very important issue for anaesthetists.
Although there are many conditions that are taken into consideration in patient follow-up, it is a position frequently used in the treatment of pulmonary diseases other than surgery.
PEEP application in the prone position is especially used in the treatment of conditions such as acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
This treatment method basically aims to improve oxygenation and ventilation in the lungs.
While providing improvement in the lungs, it may indirectly lead to some changes in the gastrointestinal system.
Depending on PEEP levels, intra-abdominal pressure may increase and subsequently cause reflux of gastric contents or gastroparesis.
The prone position itself also increases the risk of reflux.
Gastric POCUS (Point of Care Ultrasound) is a noninvasive method that gives us information about the stomach contents and can be easily performed at the bedside.
Both patient position and respiratory parameters, such as PEEP, may have an effect on gastric POCUS.
Visualization of gastric content or detection of gastric retention allows us to predict possible pulmonary aspiration complications before extubation, and gastric POCUS may be a valuable marker before extubation in patients who remain in prone positions for a long time.
The aim of this study was to determine the effect of PEEP application on the antrum diameter evaluated by gastric POCUS and the risk of aspiration before extubation in patients undergoing spinal surgery in the prone position.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
111
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Çankaya
-
Ankara, Çankaya, Turkey
- Ankara City Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Study Population
Patients who will operate from their lombar spine.
Description
Inclusion Criteria
- 18-65 years of age
- ASA I-II risk group
Exclusion Criteria:
- Asthma
- COPD
- Gastroesophageal reflux
- Gastric herniation
- Gastric surgery,
- Intracranial tumor
- Epilepsy
- Neuromuscular disease
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: GROUP I: PEEP 0
Patients will receive 0 cmH20 PEEP
|
PEEP 0 CMH20 will be used During Surgery
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: GROUP II: PEEP 4
Patients will receive 4 cmH20 PEEP
|
PEEP 4 CMH20 will be used During Surgery
|
|
Active Comparator: GROUP III: PEEP 8
Patients will receive 8 cmH20 PEEP
|
PEEP 8 CMH20 will be used During Surgery
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Gastric antrum diameter
Time Frame: induction of anaesthesia at 0 minutes,After induction of anaesthesia at 1 minutes,at 10 minutes at the end of the case
|
Cross-sectional area (CSA) (cm2)
|
induction of anaesthesia at 0 minutes,After induction of anaesthesia at 1 minutes,at 10 minutes at the end of the case
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Intraabdominal pressure (IAP) measurement
Time Frame: induction of anaesthesia at 0 minutes,After induction of anaesthesia at 1 minutes,at 10 minutes at the end of the case
|
Comparing IAP between three groups.
|
induction of anaesthesia at 0 minutes,After induction of anaesthesia at 1 minutes,at 10 minutes at the end of the case
|
|
gastric volume measurement
Time Frame: induction of anaesthesia at 0 minutes,After induction of anaesthesia at 1 minutes,at 10 minutes at the end of the case
|
gastric volume (ml)
|
induction of anaesthesia at 0 minutes,After induction of anaesthesia at 1 minutes,at 10 minutes at the end of the case
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Vital parameters Pulse oximetry (%)
Time Frame: induction of anaesthesia at 0 minutes,After induction of anaesthesia at 1 minutes,at 10 minutes at the end of the case
|
Pulse oximetry (%)
|
induction of anaesthesia at 0 minutes,After induction of anaesthesia at 1 minutes,at 10 minutes at the end of the case
|
|
Vital parameters heart rate (beats/minute)
Time Frame: induction of anaesthesia at 0 minutes,After induction of anaesthesia at 1 minutes,at 10 minutes at the end of the case
|
heart rate (beats/minute)
|
induction of anaesthesia at 0 minutes,After induction of anaesthesia at 1 minutes,at 10 minutes at the end of the case
|
|
Vital parameters systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)
Time Frame: induction of anaesthesia at 0 minutes,After induction of anaesthesia at 1 minutes,at 10 minutes at the end of the case
|
systolic and diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)
|
induction of anaesthesia at 0 minutes,After induction of anaesthesia at 1 minutes,at 10 minutes at the end of the case
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Chui J, Craen RA. An update on the prone position: Continuing Professional Development. Can J Anaesth. 2016 Jun;63(6):737-67. doi: 10.1007/s12630-016-0634-x. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
- Fujishima S. Guideline-based management of acute respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Intensive Care. 2023 Mar 10;11(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40560-023-00658-3.
- El-Boghdadly K, Wojcikiewicz T, Perlas A. Perioperative point-of-care gastric ultrasound. BJA Educ. 2019 Jul;19(7):219-226. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2019.03.003. Epub 2019 Apr 24. No abstract available.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
February 5, 2024
Primary Completion (Actual)
July 29, 2024
Study Completion (Actual)
September 1, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 1, 2024
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 14, 2024
First Posted (Actual)
April 17, 2024
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
October 15, 2024
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 10, 2024
Last Verified
October 1, 2024
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Digestive System Diseases
- Pathologic Processes
- Respiratory Tract Diseases
- Respiration Disorders
- Gastrointestinal Diseases
- Esophageal Motility Disorders
- Deglutition Disorders
- Esophageal Diseases
- Gastroesophageal Reflux
- Laryngopharyngeal Reflux
- Respiratory Aspiration
- Respiratory Aspiration of Gastric Contents
Other Study ID Numbers
- gastric residual volume
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Respiratory Aspiration of Gastric Content
-
Hôpital FribourgeoisNot yet recruitingGastric Content | Full Stomach Status | Aspiration RiskSwitzerland
-
Adiyaman University Research HospitalCompletedRespiratory Aspiration of Gastric Content
-
Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai...TerminatedPregnancy | Respiratory Aspiration of Gastric ContentsCanada
-
University of AarhusAarhus University Hospital SkejbyCompletedRespiratory Aspiration of Gastric Content
-
Beni-Suef UniversityRecruitingPulmonary Aspiration | Gastric Content AspirationEgypt
-
University of FloridaActive, not recruitingRespiratory Aspiration of Gastric ContentsUnited States
-
The Chaim Sheba Medical CenterNot yet recruitingPregnancy | Respiratory Aspiration of Gastric Content
-
Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai...CompletedPregnancy | Respiratory Aspiration of Gastric ContentCanada
-
University Hospital, BrestUnknownPositive-Pressure Respiration | Respiratory Aspiration of Gastric ContentFrance
-
Glostrup University Hospital, CopenhagenCompletedRespiratory Aspiration of Gastric Contents | Intubation IntraesophagealDenmark
Clinical Trials on PEEP 0
-
Gachon University Gil Medical CenterCompletedThe Effect of Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (lapaPEEP)Brain IschemiaKorea, Republic of
-
University Hospital, MontpellierTerminatedIntensive Care Unit | Invasive Mechanical Ventilation | Ready to Wean From VentilationFrance
-
University Hospital, Basel, SwitzerlandRecruiting
-
Universitätsklinikum KölnWithdrawnInsufficiency; Cardiac, Complicating SurgeryGermany
-
Umraniye Education and Research HospitalCompletedRespiratory System AbnormalitiesTurkey
-
University Hospital, AntwerpResearch Foundation FlandersCompletedRespiratory Failure | Critical Care | Respiration, Artificial | Ventilator Weaning | Respiratory MusclesBelgium
-
Muehlenkreiskliniken, MKKRecruitingCardiac Arrest (CA) | PEEP, Occult | CPR | Ventilation TherapyGermany
-
Al-Azhar UniversityCompletedPulmonary Atelectasis, PostoperativeEgypt
-
Hongpeng LiCompletedTraumatic Brain Injury | Mechanical Ventilation Complication
-
Ankara City Hospital BilkentNot yet recruitingMechanical Ventilation | Postoperative Pulmonary Complications | Impaired Oxygenation