A Controlled Human Rhinovirus Infection Study of 2-Deoxy-D-Glucose in Healthy Adults

November 15, 2024 updated by: G.ST Antivirals GmbH

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase 2 Study Using the Rhinovirus Challenge Model to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of 2-Deoxy-D-Glucose as Pre-exposure Prophylaxis

2-DG-02 is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind Phase 2 study to investigate the efficacy and safety of 2-Deoxy-D-Glucose as a pre-exposure prophylaxis using the rhinovirus challenge model in healthy study participants.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Detailed Description

2-DG-02 is a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind Phase 2 study using the rhinovirus challenge model in healthy study participants aged 18 to 64 years.

The primary objective is to confirm the efficacy of 2-DG compared to placebo for the prevention of rhinovirus-associated illness.

Secondary objectives are

  • to evaluate the effect of 2-DG on the occurrence and course of rhinovirus infection
  • to evaluate the effect of 2-DG on the severity of symptoms of rhinovirus infection
  • to evaluate safety and tolerability of 2-DG administrated over 1 week in the presence of rhinovirus exposure
  • to evaluate pharmacokinetics of 2-DG

    128 subjects, who have been pre-screened and found to be seronegative to rhinovirus type 39, are randomized 1:1 to either 2-DG (pre-exposure prophylaxis) or placebo the day prior to inoculation. Subjects receive 2-DG or placebo starting from the day prior to inoculation until 5 days post inoculation.

Interim safety and efficacy reviews are performed by a Safety Monitoring Committee.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

64

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Leiden, Netherlands, 2333
        • Centre For Human Drug Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy male or female subjects 18 to 64 (inclusive at screening) years of age.
  • Women of childbearing potential and all males must practice effective contraception during the study and be willing and able to continue contraception until end of study.
  • Signed informed consent form prior to any study-related procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active smoker or history of smoking > 5 pack years.
  • Upper or lower respiratory tract infection or febrile illness
  • Presence (at screening) of serum RV-39 neutralizing antibody titer at greater than one in four (1:4) dilution.
  • Nasopharyngeal swab indicative for Influenza or SARS-CoV2 infection by rapid antigen test at baseline.
  • Prior inoculation with a virus from the same virus family as the challenge virus.
  • Any anatomic or neurologic abnormality impairing the gag reflex, or associated with an increased risk of aspiration, or any abnormality significantly altering the anatomy of the nose or nasopharynx in a substantial way that may interfere with the aims of the study and in particular any of the nasal assessments or viral challenge.
  • Positive Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), Hepatitis C virus antibody (HCV Ab), or human immunodeficiency virus antibody (HIV Ab) at screening.
  • Any confirmed or suspected disease or condition associated with immune system impairment, including auto-immune diseases, asplenia or recurrent severe infections.
  • Active allergic rhinitis or hay fever.
  • Medical history or active asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or any other pulmonary disease deemed by the investigator to increase the risk of participating in the study.
  • Active nasal disease, e.g., nasal polyposis, significant septal deviation, chronic rhinosinusitis, etc.
  • Frequent epistaxis or nasal sinus surgery within 3 months before baseline.
  • Females: Pregnant, breast-feeding or intentions to become pregnant during the study.
  • Evidence or history of drug or alcohol abuse.
  • Positive test for drugs of abuse at screening or prior to study drug administration.
  • Use of any prescribed or non-prescribed medication (except for contraceptives, paracetamol) within 1 week or less than 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to the first administration of investigational product.
  • Use of any over the counter cold prophylaxis products including nasal sprays, C-vitamins, zinc or Echinacea within 2 weeks prior to the first administration of investigational product.
  • Participation in an investigational medical product, vaccine or device study within 3 months or 5 half-lives prior to the study period (whichever is longer), or more than 4 times in the past year.
  • Hypersensitivity/allergy to any of the investigational product ingredients.
  • Individuals with close contact to at risk patient group (infants less than 3 years, the extremely elderly >80 years or infirm, pregnant women, patients with severe lung disease(e.g., asthma/cystic fibrosis (CF)/COPD), patients with primary or secondary immunodeficiencies or ongoing immunosuppressive therapy).
  • Any clinically relevant abnormal history, physical finding, 12-lead safety ECG, vital signs, laboratory value at screening or any known factor that could interfere with the objectives of the trial or the safety of the volunteer. In the case of uncertain or questionable results, tests performed during screening may be repeated before inclusion to confirm eligibility or judged to be clinically irrelevant.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Study Drug
Each subject receives a multiple dose of a 3.5% 2-Deoxyglucose as nasal spray solution. The maximum daily dose is 56 mg/day if applied 4 times/day, over 7 days.
Intranasal administration
Other Names:
  • 2-DG
  • 2-Deoxyglucose
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Each subject receives a multiple dose of placebo as nasal spray solution. The dose is corresponding to the amount of solution needed in the serum group.
Intranasal administration

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The difference in the rate of rhinovirus-associated illness between 2-DG and placebo
Time Frame: baseline until day 22
Difference in the rate of symptomatic illness and laboratory-confirmed infection
baseline until day 22

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of infected subjects
Time Frame: baseline, days 2-22 after start of dosing
Difference in the number of subjects with laboratory-confirmed infections. A laboratory-confirmed infection is identified either by isolating rhinovirus on at least one day after the virus challenge using qPCR or by a 4-fold increase in neutralizing antibody titer to RV-39 from acute (day -1) to convalescent sera (day 22) using the neutralizing assay.
baseline, days 2-22 after start of dosing
Difference in percent of infected subjects
Time Frame: baseline, days 2-22 after start of dosing
Difference in percentage of subjects with laboratory-confirmed infections. A laboratory-confirmed infection is identified either by isolating rhinovirus on at least one day after the virus challenge using qPCR or by a 4-fold increase in neutralizing antibody titer to RV-39 from acute (day -1) to convalescent sera (day 22) using the neutralizing assay.
baseline, days 2-22 after start of dosing
Difference in percent of days virus positive
Time Frame: days 2-6
Difference in the percentage of days with a positive virus load. A positive virus load is determined by isolating rhinovirus on at least one day following the virus challenge, either using qPCR or a TCID50 assay.
days 2-6
Difference in peak nasal virus load
Time Frame: days 2-6
Virus load is confirmed by isolating rhinovirus on at least one day after the virus challenge, using either qPCR or a TCID50 assay.
days 2-6
Difference in AUC nasal virus load
Time Frame: days 2-6
Difference in AUC log 10 nasal virus load. Virus load is confirmed by isolating rhinovirus on at least one day after the virus challenge, using either qPCR or a TCID50 assay.
days 2-6
Difference in Total Jackson Symptom Score
Time Frame: days 2-6 after start of dosing
The difference of total Jackson Symptom Score (4 point-liters scales from 0 to 3) where a lower score means a better outcome.
days 2-6 after start of dosing
Duration of illness
Time Frame: days 2-15 after start of dosing
In study participants with RAI duration of illness is the time to the first day of the two consecutive days with a total symptom score ≤ 1 that occurs after the subject has met the symptom criteria for a RAI. A lower duration means a better outcome.
days 2-15 after start of dosing
Difference in percent of days Jackson Symptom Score positive
Time Frame: days 2-6 after start of dosing
Percentage of days with positive Jackson Symptom Score ( score >2), where a lower percentage means a better outcome compared to placebo.
days 2-6 after start of dosing
Difference in Peak Jackson Symptom Score
Time Frame: days 2-6 after start of dosing
The highest daily total of all patient-reported symptoms on the Jackson Cold Scale (4 point-liters scales from 0 to 3 where a lower score means a better outcome compared to placebo).
days 2-6 after start of dosing
Difference in peak total WURSS-21
Time Frame: days 2-6 after start of dosing
The highest daily total of all patient-reported symptoms on the WURSS-21 questionnaire (8-point Likert scales from 0 to 7) where a lower score means a better outcome compared to placebo.
days 2-6 after start of dosing
Difference in AUC total WURSS-21
Time Frame: days 2-6 after start of dosing
Difference in AUC total WURSS-21 based a score recorded through the WURSS-21 questionnaire (8-point Likert scales from 0 to 7) where lower score means a better outcome compared to placebo.
days 2-6 after start of dosing
Occurrence of adverse events (AEs) and adverse drug-reactions (ADRs)
Time Frame: from screening (day -56) until end of study (day 22± 2) after start of dosing
Number of AEs and ADRs assessed by type, frequency and severity graded as per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE).
from screening (day -56) until end of study (day 22± 2) after start of dosing
Biodistribution of multiple doses of 2-DG in plasma samples
Time Frame: baseline, days 6 and 22± 2 after start of dosing
Analysis of 2-DG concentrations in plasma samples measured by LCMS (μg/ml).
baseline, days 6 and 22± 2 after start of dosing
Biodistribution of multiple doses of 2-DG in nasal wash samples
Time Frame: baseline, days 2-6 and day 22± 2 after start of dosing
Analysis of 2-DG concentrations in nasal wash samples measured by LCMS (μg/ml).
baseline, days 2-6 and day 22± 2 after start of dosing

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ingrid de Visser-Kamerling, PhD, Centre For Human Drug Research

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 2, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 13, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

August 13, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 16, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

April 19, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2024

Last Verified

November 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Nasopharyngitis

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe