- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT06404827
The Effect of Hippotherapy Simulator in Children with Spastic Cerebral Palsy
Investıgatıon of the Effect of Hıppotherapy Sımulator on Lower Extremıty Selectıve Motor Control, Balance and Trunk Control in Chıldren Wıth Spastıc Cerebral Palsy
The horseback riding simulator (HRS) is a dynamic robotic device that mimics the movement of a horse for hippotherapy purposes. HRS aims to improve the patient's balance, adaptation and provide postural adjustment by mimicking the rhythmic movements of the horse.
This study aims to research the potential benefits of the horseback riding simulator on the lower extremity selective motor control, balance and trunk control in children with Cerebral palsy.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Between the dates of the study, children with Cerebral palsy (CP) who meet the inclusion criteria will be allocated into two groups (intervention group, control group) by randomiZation method.
Intervention group: horseback riding simulator (HRS) will be applied in addition to routine Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation. This group will receive 20 minutes of routine physiotherapy training and 20 minutes of HRS application in addition to 2 sessions per week for 8 weeks.
Control group: Routine physiotherapy training will be applied within a specific programme for 40 minutes in 2 sessions per week for 8 weeks.
All the assessments will be performed before and after the training in the 8-week groups.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Gaziantep, Turkey, 27100
- Gaziantep
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of Spastic Cerebral Palsy
- Voluntary participation
- Age between 5-17 years,
- GMFCS Level I-II-III
- MACS Level I-II-III
- Modified Asworth Scale (MAS) Level 1-2-3
- Have the ability to sit with support
Exclusion Criteria:
- Having severe visual and hearing problems
- Severe distractibility problems and inability to follow task instructions,
- Not voluntary to participate in the research,
- Individuals with CP who have had hip or spine surgery in the last 6 months
- Individuals with CP who have undergone Botox in the last 6 months
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention group (Horseback riding simulator+Routine physiotherapy)
Horseback riding simulator (HRS) will be applied in addition to routine Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation.
This group will receive 20 minutes of routine physiotherapy training and 20 minutes of HRS application in addition to 2 sessions per week for 8 weeks.
|
Horseback riding simulator (HRS) will be applied in addition to routine Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation.
Routine Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation within a spesific programme
|
|
Active Comparator: Control group (Routine physiotherapy)
Routine physiotherapy training will be applied within a specific programme for 40 minutes in 2 sessions per week for 8 weeks.
|
Routine Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation within a spesific programme
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS)
Time Frame: At Baseline
|
Assessing functional level and gross motor function of children with CP.
Level I refers to a child walking independently, while level V refers to mobility with a wheelchair.
|
At Baseline
|
|
Change from Baseline Selective Control Assessment of the Lower Extremity at 8 weeks
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks
|
Evaluates the lower extremity selective motor control of individuals with CP.
The scale assesses five joints separately and bilaterally: hip, knee, ankle, subtalar joint and toe.
The degree of selective motor control is determined for each joint as 'normal' (2 points), 'impaired' (1 point) or 'unable to perform' (0 points), according to the patient's ability to perform the movements.
The total score is obtained by summing the scores from the joint levels for each limb, with a maximum score of 10 points.
Low scores indicate poor selective motor control.
|
Change from Baseline at 8 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline Pediatric balance scale at 8 weeks
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks
|
Assesses the balance of children with CP.
This scale consists of 14 items, each of which is scored from 0 to 4. A score of 0 indicates that he/she cannot carry out the instruction and a score of 4 indicates that he/she can do it without difficulty.
The total score ranges from 0-56.
A low total score indicates a decrease in balance function.
|
Change from Baseline at 8 weeks
|
|
Change from Baseline Trunk Control Measurement Scale at 8 weeks
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks
|
This scale consists of two main parts, dynamic and static sitting balance, and provides an assessment.
The scale consists of 15 items.
Items are scored as 0, 1, 2 or 3.
The minimum score that can be obtained from the scale is 0 and the maximum score is 58.
A higher score indicates better trunk control.
|
Change from Baseline at 8 weeks
|
|
Manuel ability classification system (MACS)
Time Frame: At Baseline
|
Classify how children with CP use their hands when dealing with objects in daily activities.
It is a 5-level classification scale.
The higher the level, the worse the manual ability.
Level 1 means that objects can be handled and used easily and successfully.
Level 5 refers to being unable to handle and use objects and having severely limited ability to perform even simple activities.
|
At Baseline
|
|
Change from Baseline Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) at 8 weeks
Time Frame: Change from Baseline at 8 weeks
|
This scale is the most widely used clinical scale to assess spasticity.
It is a 6-point scale that assesses muscle tone by passively moving the joint through the normal range of possible motion and recording resistance to passive movement.
The scoring ranges from 0-5.
There is no tonus increase at 0. 5 indicates that the affected limb is rigid.
The higher the score, the greater the increase in tonus.
|
Change from Baseline at 8 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Yalçın Karabulut, Hasan Kalyoncu University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- HKU-FTR-YK-1
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy
-
Ankara City Hospital BilkentRecruitingCerebral Palsy (CP) | Cerebral Palsy, Spastic, Diplegic | Diplegic Cerebral Palsy With Spasticity | Transcranial Magnetic StimilationTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Lahore University of Biological and Applied SciencesRecruiting
-
Suleyman Demirel UniversityCompletedCerebral Palsy | Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy | Spastic Diplegia Cerebral PalsyTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation HospitalCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)RecruitingCerebral Palsy (CP) | Hemiplegic Cerebral PalsyCanada
-
Cairo UniversityCompletedCerebral Palsy (CP) | Unilateral Cerebral PalsyEgypt
-
University of California, San FranciscoNot yet recruitingCerebral Palsy | Cerebral Palsy (CP) | Infant | Cerebral Palsy InfantileUnited States
-
Lahore University of Biological and Applied SciencesNot yet recruitingSpastic Diplegia Cerebral PalsyPakistan
-
IRCCS Fondazione Stella MarisNot yet recruitingCerebral Palsy (CP) | EEG | Unilateral Cerebral Palsy | Action ObservationItaly
-
IRCCS Fondazione Stella MarisUniversity of Siena, ItalyRecruitingCerebral Palsy (CP) | Motor Imagery | CP (Cerebral Palsy) | Action ObservationItaly
-
Gazi UniversityCompletedCerebral Palsy | Cerebral Palsy, Spastic | Cerebral Palsy Spastic Diplegia | Cerebral Palsy Quadriplegic | Cerebral Palsy, MonoplegicTurkey
Clinical Trials on Horseback riding simulator
-
Baylor UniversityHorses and Humans Research FoundationCompleted
-
The Catholic University of KoreaSamsung Medical Center; Konkuk UniversityCompletedCerebral Palsy | Motor ActivityKorea, Republic of
-
University of Missouri-ColumbiaHarry S. Truman Memorial Veterans' Hospital; Horses and Humans Research FoundationCompletedTraumatic Brain Injury | Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
-
Riphah International UniversityCompleted
-
University of Missouri, Kansas CityCompleted
-
University of Colorado, DenverNational Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)CompletedAutism Spectrum Disorder | Child Development Disorders, Pervasive
-
University of Colorado, DenverEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompletedMental Disorders | Autism Spectrum DisorderUnited States
-
University of IoanninaCompleted
-
University of PrimorskaCompleted
-
Tianjin Medical University General HospitalRecruitingComputer Simulator and Mannequin SimulatorChina