Comparison of ARISCAT Score and Post-operative Pulmonary Complication Rate in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Comparison of ARISCAT Score and Post-operative Pulmonary Complication Rate in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Cases: The Effect of Prone Position and Endoscopic Intervention

Postoperative pulmonary complications are relatively common in all age groups and are closely related to increased costs, morbidity and mortality in the postoperative period. In recent years, various risk indices have been developed for preoperative evaluation to predict postoperative pulmonary complications, such as the American Society of Anaesthesiologists Physical Status Classification (ASA), the Assessment of Respiratory Risk in Surgical Patients in Catalonia (ARISCAT). The ARISCAT score has demonstrated promising results in identifying patients at higher risk for pulmonary complications. The ARISCAT risk index is derived from multiple variables, including age, oxygen saturation, previous respiratory tract infections, anaemia, abdominal or thoracic surgery, operative time, and emergency surgery. The ARISCAT risk index is used to predict respiratory failure, bronchospasm, respiratory tract infections, atelectasis, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, and aspiration pneumonia.

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL) is a type of operation performed endoscopically in a prone position in cases of kidney stones that cannot be broken by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) and/or cannot be removed by ureterocystoscopy. The prone position is one of the positions that limits lung capacity and respiratory function. The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between the ARISCAT score in patients undergoing PNL and the occurrence of pulmonary complications in the postoperative period.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Şanlıurfa, Turkey, 63050
        • University of Health Science Turkey Sanliurfa Mehmet Akif Inan Training and Research Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study included 50 ASA I-III patients aged between 18 and 80 years who were about to undergo percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I-III patients
  • Patients who undergone of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with any liver and/or kidney failure
  • Obese patients (body mass index (BMI) 30 and above)
  • Trauma patients
  • Cancer patients
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) IV patients
  • Cardiac arrhythmia, implanted pacemakers
  • A history of chronic pain

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Patients who had undergone Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
rate of pulmonary complication
Time Frame: The postoperative period in the first 24 hours
rate of pulmonary complication such as respiratory failure, bronchospasm, atelectasis, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, or aspiration pneumonia.
The postoperative period in the first 24 hours
rate of lung infection
Time Frame: The postoperative period in the first 72 hours
rate of pneumonia (bacterial or virutic)
The postoperative period in the first 72 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 31, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 10, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 16, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MAIEAH630003

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe