Telecoaching Intervention for Children With Autism and Their Parents in Palestine

August 20, 2026 updated by: Mohammad Salahat, Arab American University (Palestine)

Acceptability, Feasibility, and Potential Impact of a Telecoaching Intervention for Parents of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder in Palestine: A Mixed-Methods Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

Families of children with autism in Palestine may have difficulty accessing early intervention and rehabilitation services because specialized services are limited and families may face geographical, financial, and other barriers. Providing support to parents remotely may help families access professional guidance without needing to travel for every session.

This pilot study examined whether an eight-week parent telecoaching program called Occupational Performance Coaching (OPC) could be delivered successfully and was acceptable to parents of young children with autism in Palestine. The study also explored changes in children's participation in everyday activities and autism-related characteristics, as well as parents' confidence in supporting their child and their quality of life. Because this was a small pilot study, these outcomes were explored to help plan future research rather than to determine whether the intervention was effective.

Parents were assigned to one of two groups. Parents in the telecoaching group received eight individual online coaching sessions over eight weeks, with each session lasting approximately 40-60 minutes. Coaching helped parents identify activities that were important to their child and family, understand difficulties affecting the child's participation, develop possible strategies, try these strategies during everyday routines, and review progress with the coach.

Parents in the waitlist group had access to general Arabic-language information and videos about autism through the Sanad Alhayaa digital platform during the eight-week comparison period but did not receive individual coaching. After completing the post-intervention assessment, they were offered the telecoaching program.

The study also included interviews with parents who received telecoaching to better understand their experiences, perceived benefits, and barriers to using this form of support.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study used an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design. The quantitative component was a two-arm, parallel-group external pilot randomized controlled trial evaluating an eight-week telehealth-delivered Occupational Performance Coaching (OPC) intervention for parents of children with autism in Palestine. The study primarily evaluated the feasibility of trial procedures and intervention delivery and the acceptability of telecoaching. Child and parent outcomes were examined exploratorily to characterize patterns and variability of change and to inform the design of a future definitive trial.

Parents and their children were recruited from West Bank districts through community-based and online recruitment approaches. Eligible parents or primary caregivers were aged 18 years or older, spent the majority of the intervention period with the child, and had access to an internet-enabled device and reliable internet connection. Eligible children were aged 3-7 years and had a confirmed diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder from a neurologist or psychiatrist. Children receiving other early-intervention or rehabilitation services remained eligible.

Following informed consent and completion of baseline assessments, 26 parent-child dyads were randomized, with 14 allocated to OPC telecoaching and 12 to the waitlist control condition. Allocation was conducted using covariate-adaptive minimization based on the Pocock-Simon approach, with a random component, to reduce imbalance between groups with respect to child sex and baseline CARS-2 autism severity. Randomization was centrally controlled by an independent coordinator who was not involved in recruitment, baseline assessment, intervention delivery, or outcome analysis. Participants and the intervention provider could not be masked because of the nature of the coaching intervention.

Participants allocated to the intervention received eight weekly individualized OPC sessions delivered synchronously through Zoom, with sessions lasting approximately 40-60 minutes. Coaching focused on parent-selected occupational performance goals and supported parents to analyze performance challenges, generate possible solutions, implement strategies within everyday routines, and review progress. The Sanad Alhayaa digital platform supported intervention-related procedures, including appointment booking, questionnaires, individualized resources, and intervention documentation. During the randomized comparison period, participants allocated to the waitlist condition had access to general Arabic-language autism-related resources through Sanad Alhayaa but did not receive individualized OPC. They were offered OPC telecoaching after completing the post-intervention assessment.

Feasibility was evaluated using prespecified progression criteria addressing recruitment, digital platform procedures, randomization, retention, questionnaire completion, intervention attendance, intervention fidelity, and safety. Telecoaching acceptability was assessed using the Saudi Telehealth Acceptance Scale. Exploratory child outcomes included individualized occupational performance and satisfaction measured using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure, autism-related characteristics measured using the Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist and Childhood Autism Rating Scale, Second Edition, and parent outcomes assessing parental competence and quality of life.

Quantitative analyses emphasized descriptive feasibility estimates and exploratory estimation of change rather than confirmatory hypothesis testing. Continuous outcomes were summarized descriptively, and exploratory within-group and between-group changes were accompanied by confidence intervals and standardized effect-size estimates where appropriate. The small pilot sample and exploratory nature of these analyses were considered when interpreting the findings.

Following the intervention, semi-structured interviews were conducted with intervention participants to explore their experiences and perceptions of telecoaching, including acceptability, perceived benefits, facilitators, barriers, and implementation experiences. The qualitative component was intended to provide contextual understanding of the quantitative findings and the implementation of the intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Parent or primary caregiver aged ≥18 years and able to provide informed consent.
  • Parent or caregiver spends the majority of the intervention period with the child.
  • Access to an internet-enabled device capable of videoconferencing and a reliable internet connection.
  • Child aged 3-7 years with a confirmed diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder by a neurologist or psychiatrist.
  • Children receiving other early-intervention or rehabilitation services remained eligible to participate.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Parent or caregiver unable to meet the above participation requirements.
  • Child with a co-occurring medical, neurological, or genetic condition requiring intensive medical or pharmacological management beyond the scope of the intervention, such as uncontrolled epilepsy or a complex genetic syndrome.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: OPC Telecoaching
Participants allocated to this arm received an eight-week individualized Occupational Performance Coaching (OPC) intervention delivered remotely through Zoom and supported by the Sanad Alhayaa digital platform.
Occupational Performance Coaching (OPC) is a collaborative, occupation-focused coaching approach that supports parents to identify meaningful participation goals, analyze occupational performance challenges, generate possible solutions, implement strategies within everyday routines, and review progress. In this study, OPC was delivered individually through eight weekly 40-60 minute Zoom sessions. Sanad Alhayaa supported appointment booking, electronic questionnaires, secure individualized resources, and intervention documentation.
Other: Waitlist Control: General Digital Resources
During the eight-week randomized comparison period, participants allocated to this arm had access to general autism-related resources through the Sanad Alhayaa digital platform but did not receive individualized OPC. After completing the post-intervention assessment, they were offered the OPC telecoaching intervention.
General Arabic-language information and videos addressing autism, sensory needs, social interaction, and activities of daily living were made available through the Sanad Alhayaa resource library. This resource access did not include individualized coaching, individualized resource uploads, private clinical messaging, or coaching-session booking.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Recruitment Target Achieved
Time Frame: During the recruitment period
Recruitment was assessed as the percentage of the prespecified recruitment target achieved during the planned recruitment period. The prespecified progression criterion was recruitment of 30 parent-child dyads within four weeks.
During the recruitment period
Percentage of Participants Successfully Completing Required Digital Platform Procedures
Time Frame: From enrollment through post-intervention assessment (approximately 8 weeks)
Digital platform feasibility was assessed as the percentage of participants who successfully completed the required Sanad Alhayaa platform procedures, including account creation and child-profile registration. The prespecified progression criterion was successful completion of the required platform procedures by at least 80% of participants.
From enrollment through post-intervention assessment (approximately 8 weeks)
Percentage of Participants Successfully Randomized According to the Prespecified Procedure
Time Frame: Immediately after baseline assessment
Randomization feasibility was assessed as the percentage of randomized participants allocated according to the prespecified randomization procedure without allocation errors or major protocol deviations. The prespecified progression criterion was successful allocation of all randomized participants without errors or major deviations.
Immediately after baseline assessment
Percentage of Participants Completing Required Online Study Questionnaires
Time Frame: At baseline and post-intervention (approximately 8 weeks)
Questionnaire completion was assessed as the percentage of participants who completed the required online study questionnaires at baseline and post-intervention. The prespecified progression criterion was questionnaire completion by at least 80% of participants at each assessment point.
At baseline and post-intervention (approximately 8 weeks)
Percentage of Randomized Participants Completing Post-Intervention Assessment
Time Frame: From randomization through post-intervention assessment (approximately 8 weeks)
Participant retention was assessed as the percentage of randomized participants who completed the post-intervention assessment. The prespecified progression criterion was retention of at least 80% of randomized participants.
From randomization through post-intervention assessment (approximately 8 weeks)
Percentage of Intervention Participants Attending at Least 7 of 8 OPC Sessions
Time Frame: During the 8-week OPC intervention period
Intervention attendance was assessed as the percentage of intervention participants who attended at least seven of the eight planned OPC telecoaching sessions. The prespecified progression criterion was attendance at a minimum of seven of eight sessions.
During the 8-week OPC intervention period
OPC Fidelity Measure: Percentage of Prescribed Components Demonstrated
Time Frame: During the 8-week OPC intervention period
Intervention fidelity was assessed using the OPC Fidelity Measure in independently audited OPC sessions. Fidelity was calculated as the percentage of prescribed OPC components demonstrated during each audited session. The prespecified progression criterion was fidelity of at least 80%.
During the 8-week OPC intervention period
Number of Serious Adverse Events Attributable to Study Participation
Time Frame: From enrollment through post-intervention assessment (approximately 8 weeks)
Safety was assessed as the number of serious adverse events considered attributable to study participation. The prespecified progression criterion was no serious adverse events attributable to study participation.
From enrollment through post-intervention assessment (approximately 8 weeks)
Mean Saudi Telehealth Acceptance Scale (STAS) Score
Time Frame: Baseline and post-intervention (8 weeks)
The STAS is a 24-item Arabic-language measure of telehealth acceptance covering Performance Expectancy, Effort Expectancy, Social Influence, Facilitating Conditions, and Behavioral Intention. Items are rated from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree), with higher scores indicating greater acceptance of telehealth. Domain and overall scores were assessed at baseline and post-intervention.
Baseline and post-intervention (8 weeks)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Canadian Occupational Performance Measure
Time Frame: Baseline and post-intervention (8 weeks)
The COPM is an individualized, occupation-focused measure in which parents identify and prioritize occupational performance goals for their child. For prioritized goals, parents rate perceived performance and satisfaction with performance separately on 10-point scales ranging from 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating better perceived performance or greater satisfaction. Mean Performance and Satisfaction scores were calculated separately and change was assessed from baseline to post-intervention. The COPM was administered only to participants allocated to OPC because it formed part of individualized goal identification and intervention planning.
Baseline and post-intervention (8 weeks)
Autism Treatment Evaluation Checklist (ATEC)
Time Frame: Baseline and post-intervention (8 weeks)
The ATEC is a 77-item parent-report measure comprising four domains: Speech/Language/Communication, Sociability, Sensory/Cognitive Awareness, and Health/Physical/Behavior. Domain scores and the total score were calculated separately. Total scores range from 0 to 179, with lower scores indicating fewer autism-related difficulties. Change in domain and total scores was assessed from baseline to post-intervention.
Baseline and post-intervention (8 weeks)
Childhood Autism Rating Scale, Second Edition (CARS-2)
Time Frame: Baseline and post-intervention (8 weeks)
The CARS-2 is a clinician-rated measure of autism-related characteristics comprising 15 items rated from 1 to 4. Item ratings are summed to produce a total score ranging from 15 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater severity of autism-related characteristics. Change in total score was assessed from baseline to post-intervention.
Baseline and post-intervention (8 weeks)
Parental Competence Scale for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
Time Frame: Baseline and post-intervention (8 weeks)
The PCS-ASD is a 29-item Arabic-language measure of parental competence. Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale, with negatively worded items reverse scored. Total scores range from 29 to 145, with higher scores indicating greater perceived parental competence. Change in total score was assessed from baseline to post-intervention.
Baseline and post-intervention (8 weeks)
World Health Organization Quality of Life, Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF)
Time Frame: Baseline and post-intervention (8 weeks)
The WHOQOL-BREF is a 26-item measure of quality of life covering four domains: Physical Health, Psychological, Social Relationships, and Environment, together with two global items. Items are rated on 5-point response scales. Domain scores are calculated according to WHO scoring guidance, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Change in domain scores was assessed from baseline to post-intervention.
Baseline and post-intervention (8 weeks)
Arabic Quality of Life in Autism (A-QoLA)
Time Frame: Baseline and post-intervention (8 weeks)
The A-QoLA is an autism-specific parent-reported quality-of-life measure comprising two separately scored parts. Part A assesses parents' general quality of life, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Part B assesses the perceived impact of the child's autism-related difficulties on the parent, with higher scores indicating that parents are less affected by those difficulties. Part A and Part B were scored and interpreted separately. Change in each part was assessed from baseline to post-intervention.
Baseline and post-intervention (8 weeks)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mohammad Salahat, PhD, Arab American University (Palestine)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 21, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

June 21, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 18, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

May 24, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 24, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 20, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data will not be made publicly available because the study involved a small sample of parent-child dyads from a defined population and the consent process did not include public sharing of individual-level participant data. De-identified aggregate study findings will be reported in scientific publications.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe